Hi All, PostAuthHook to replace the default Tunnel-Private-Group-ID in the reply-packet with the generated ID now runs OK.
I placed the PostAuthHook after the AuthBy clause in the handler for the outer tunnel. A first glance learns that it works. But we assume that a re-authentication - for whatever reason - will possible place the wireless client in a different VLAN. Is there a way to preserve this behaviour, or to keep the session intact with a re-authentication? Kind regards, Patrick Renkens Centre for Information Services (UCI) Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands Op 12-11-2010 17:31, Patrick Renkens schreef: > > Hi All, > > We would like to dynamically assign VLAN's to wireless clients. > All of the authentication process (inner and outer tunnel etc.) runs OK, > but the last step should be assigning a dynamic VLAN ID > (Tunnel-Private-Group-ID) to the client in a short range of ID's. > > Can this be done, and if so, how? > > I already wrote a small PostAuthHook that can generate a random VLAN-ID > within this short range of ID's. It replaces the default > Tunnel-Private-Group-ID in the reply-packet with the generated ID, but > it doesn't do the trick. It does replace the Tunnel-Private-Group-ID but > is has no affect on the process (so it seems). > > The reason for this feature is that the current VLAN is too small and we > prefer to have several VLAN's for the wireless clients instead of a much > larger single VLAN. > > Any other ideas or workarounds are also appreciated. > > Kind regards, > Patrick Renkens > Centre for Information Services (UCI) > Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands > > > _______________________________________________ > radiator mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator > _______________________________________________ radiator mailing list [email protected] http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
