DYSLEXIC POSTS: REBUTTAL BEFORE ARTICLE PROPER...We are only now learning about 
true cost of socialized medicine-to-be. We could have truly reduced the cost of 
health care for Americans and we could   have insured more Americans then under 
Obama Plan if we: A) Allowed small- and medium-sized businesses   to form 
health associations and B) Allowed health-care provider's compete in more then 
one state and C) Reigned in trial lawyers (but  lib dems are in their pocket).  
Instead cost of health care will rise and we will    loose our number one 
position in medical technology and med R & D. Over three hundred new federal 
bureaucracies will be created with  fed gov lawyers and accountants making 
medical decisions for       you instead of you and your doctor.     Medicare 
and Medicaid are   hundreds of  billions of dollars in debt       and are 
fraught with tens of billions in fraud.   Fed gov will control 'private'   
health insurance companies in four   years, thereby, creating the illusion that 
we  don't have socialized medicine. They will serve as mere fronts   while fed 
gov will control all of health care. And, rightly so, after all, they've done 
an outstanding job with just      M & M!                                        
                                                                                
                             ON SELLING OUT...Stupak and other so-called 
pro-life dems negated their principals at the alter of Obama,      Polusi and 
President George Soros. Hyde Amendment passed in '70's allowed modest 
funding/narrowly-         defined (rape, incest, mother's life in jeopardy) fed 
involvement with abortion. Loophole in law could enable           a state to 
receive moderate to large-scale funding broadly defined (abortion on demand). 
Obama gave          Stupak and others his word - if you believe that we have a 
no longer-used Constitution for sale! Plus: he     signed an executive order 
banning it but not covering high-risk pool health plans. Further, as members of 
       Congress aren't they cognizant of two facts: 1) Congress can pass a law 
which trumps an E.O. and 2) A            junior-president can rescind his E.O.s 
at any time and his successor can undo E.O.s of predecessor. U.S.
continues to fade to black.- Richard DePersio 
(groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic; /goup/radical
centralism, /group/yoingconservativesofamerica, /group/mewfederalism).








-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, Jul 16, 2010 7:12 pm
Subject: Heretics or Converts: Democrats Better Decide by Mark Shields on 
Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent


http://www.creators.com/opinion/mark-shields/heretics-or-converts-democrats-better-decide-2010-04-17.html
 


 
 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to