another one -- still not sure if this is spam or not, but it sure seems on-topic...
On Jul 17, 2010, at 7:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > DYSLEXIC POSTS: REBUTTAL BEFORE ARTICLE PROPER...We are only now learning > about true cost of socialized medicine-to-be. We could have truly reduced the > cost of health care for Americans and we could have insured more Americans > then under Obama Plan if we: A) Allowed small- and medium-sized businesses > to form health associations and B) Allowed health-care provider's compete in > more then one state and C) Reigned in trial lawyers (but lib dems are in > their pocket). Instead cost of health care will rise and we will loose > our number one position in medical technology and med R & D. Over three > hundred new federal bureaucracies will be created with fed gov lawyers and > accountants making medical decisions for you instead of you and your > doctor. Medicare and Medicaid are hundreds of billions of dollars in > debt and are fraught with tens of billions in fraud. Fed gov will > control 'private' health insurance companies in four years, thereby, > creating the illusion that we don't have socialized medicine. They will > serve as mere fronts while fed gov will control all of health care. And, > rightly so, after all, they've done an outstanding job with just M & M! > > ON > SELLING OUT...Stupak and other so-called pro-life dems negated their > principals at the alter of Obama, Polusi and President George Soros. > Hyde Amendment passed in '70's allowed modest funding/narrowly- > defined (rape, incest, mother's life in jeopardy) fed involvement with > abortion. Loophole in law could enable a state to receive moderate > to large-scale funding broadly defined (abortion on demand). Obama gave > Stupak and others his word - if you believe that we have a no longer-used > Constitution for sale! Plus: he signed an executive order banning it but > not covering high-risk pool health plans. Further, as members of > Congress aren't they cognizant of two facts: 1) Congress can pass a law which > trumps an E.O. and 2) A junior-president can rescind his E.O.s at > any time and his successor can undo E.O.s of predecessor. U.S. > continues to fade to black.- Richard DePersio > (groups.google.com/group/rickcosmos-eclectic; /goup/radical > centralism, /group/yoingconservativesofamerica, /group/mewfederalism). > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, Jul 16, 2010 7:12 pm > Subject: Heretics or Converts: Democrats Better Decide by Mark Shields on > Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent > > http://www.creators.com/opinion/mark-shields/heretics-or-converts-democrats-better-decide-2010-04-17.html > > -- > Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community > <[email protected]> > Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism > Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
