Title: If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed
I have a problem with his book "American Theocracy." We haven't gotten anywhere close to that. It belongs in the fiction section.

David

If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed.--Mark Twain 

 


On 7/29/2010 3:56 PM, [email protected] wrote:
"E"
For my money, the best brains for the task are those of Kevin Phillips.
And in ways he is a  Radical Centrist.
 
Phillips was a GOP strategist in the Nixon era, author of the very prescient
"Emerging Republican Majority" of 1968, which was all about presidential politics,
and basically called the next 25 years quite well
 
But the mess of the Nixon years and general drift of the party disillusioned him
He was an Anderson supporter in 76 and has remained an Indie ever since.
 
His books, I have read several, take the approach you favor  / that I think you favor.
Very careful and a mix of hard criticism of both business and gvt, and obvious
thankfulness for both at the same time.
 
What appeals to me the most are  his VERY well researched criticisms of
the financial industry, which he says is the problem that matters most, far and away,
since if that was under control we would not have the serious problems
that always seem to burst on the scene just like hurricanes.
 
He also puts most of the blame on the hollowing out of American industry
on the world of finance, and was one of the few who ( in his case  "approximately " )
saw the events of 2008 a couple of years ahead of time.
 
Worth looking into ^2
 
Billy
 
=======================================================
 
In a message dated 7/29/2010 1:09:24 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
It is actually an interesting fight, where I have some sympathy (and scorn) for both sides.  As you note, wild west capitalism isn't any prettier than regulatory uncertainty, and both sides love having the other to paint as "the real villain."

What's truly tragic is there seem to be very few centrist voices willing to parcel out blame even-handedly...

E

On Jul 29, 2010, at 12:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:

Democrats countercharge that the complaints from business leaders are overblown and misplaced. They argue Obama and his party made painful decisions to avert an economic catastrophe: bailing out the automakers, saving the banks without nationalizing them, and passing a massive stimulus package that they say wrenched the nation out of a tailspin. And they point as proof of their success to the performance of the private sector: second-quarter profits so far show big businesses are humming again, far outpacing analysts' estimates.

That said, Democrats have made an attack on major industries an explicit part of their campaign message. The majority wants to make the election a choice between the two parties as opposed to what the GOP is pushing for -- a referendum on the party in power. To do that, since spring, party leaders have hammered on a contrast they hope will stick: Democrats stand up for Main Street, while the GOP champions Wall Street; Democrats are for patients and doctors, while the GOP is for insurance industry profits; Democrats want to protect small businesses in the Gulf, while the GOP protects the oil companies. Et cetera.



--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
 
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to