(http://www.washingtonpost.com/)  
 


 
 
 




New Post-Kaiser-Harvard  poll highlights Democrats' problem with senior 
voters
By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff  Writers
Wednesday, October 13, 2010; 8:19 PM 
_President  Obama_ (http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Barack_Obama)  and 
his party have been _lavishing attention on young voters_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/05/AR2010100501792.html)
 , 
investing millions in an  effort to reenergize a group that helped elect him 
two 
years ago. Obama talked  recently to Rolling Stone, and he met Tuesday with 
students at _George Washington University_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/12/AR2010101206873.html)
 . On Thursday, he plans 
to appear at a  "youth town hall" on MTV.  
But a similar investment in older voters - especially those not 
particularly  motivated to go to the polls - might have been just as valuable.  
Among seniors who say that they are very interested in the upcoming 
election,  51 percent prefer to see Republicans in control of the next Congress 
while 40  percent say they want Democrats in charge. Among all other seniors, 
it's about  the reverse: 51 percent say they want Democrats to control 
Congress and 37  percent say Republicans.  
The findings come from a _major survey_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/fedrole.html)  conducted 
by The Washington Post, the 
Henry J. Kaiser  Family Foundation and Harvard University. The survey measured 
attitudes about  the federal government and included some questions about 
the upcoming elections.  
The findings show a generational divide working  against the Democrats this 
fall. If the _midterms_ 
(http://projects.washingtonpost.com/politicsglossary/election/midterm-election/)
  are in part a _referendum_ 
(http://projects.washingtonpost.com/politicsglossary/legislative/referendum/)  
on the size, 
scope and effectiveness of the federal  government, older voters appear poised 
to deliver a rebuke to the Obama  administration.  
Older voters - Democrats, Republicans or independents - are more 
pessimistic  in their assessments of Washington's performance than are younger 
voters. 
Based  on historical voting patterns, they are also more likely to turn out 
in November  - a potentially toxic combination for the Democrats.  
Older voters say the federal government is not focused on the right  
priorities. They think Washington is working less well these days that it did 
in  
the past.  
Three in 10 older voters give the government a failing grade, compared with 
8  percent of voters younger than 30. Older voters also are much harsher in 
their  judgments than they were a decade ago, when just more than one in 10 
gave  Washington an F.  
On the economy, the issue that dominates the election, Obama also needs to  
make a more persuasive case than he has with some older voters. Majorities 
of  Democrats of all ages give Obama credit for helping to improve the 
economy. But  older Republicans and, crucially, older independents are more 
likely than their  younger counterparts to say the administration has made 
things 
worse.  
Those are some of the differences between older and younger voters. But  
equally important are the views of those older voters who are paying close  
attention to this election compared to older voters who are not.  
Fully 40 percent of seniors who are most interested in the campaign say the 
 federal government has a big and negative effect on their lives. That's 
about  double the proportion of the older voters who are not so tuned in. More 
than  half of these interested older voters say the federal government 
threatens their  personal rights and freedom, twice the percentage of those who 
aren't so  interested.  
Finally, older voters who say they're very interested in the election are  
significantly more focused on the deficit than are other seniors. Just more 
than  three in five say avoiding a big deficit is more important than 
spending more  money to create jobs.  
The reason this matters so much is the significant role that older voters  
play in midterm elections. Four years ago, seniors made up 19 percent of the 
 midterm electorate. That fell to 15 percent of the electorate in 2008 as 
more  younger and middle-aged voters came out.  
That difference, however, was typical, according to  _exit polls_ 
(http://projects.washingtonpost.com/politicsglossary/election/exit-polls/) . 
Since 
1980, the share of the electorate 65 and older  was an average of five 
percentage points higher at each midterm than at the  presidential election 
preceding it.  
A separate analysis issued Tuesday by AARP, which lobbies on behalf of  
seniors, concluded that the share of the electorate older than 45 has been  
growing as the population ages. The study says the gap between the share of  
voters older and younger than 45 has been growing and estimates that almost 
two  in three voters next month will be older than 45.  
Shaping the electorate is an important part of midterm election strategy,  
which is why the president's team is so focused on those 2008 first-time or  
newer voters younger than 30. Team members know that by boosting turnout 
among  these voters somewhat higher than normal in a midterm, they could save 
House and  Senate seats. But they may be pushing a rock uphill, given the 
normal  generational swings in midterms.  
Where this could have its biggest impact is in states with competitive 
races  that also have a higher share of older voters.  
One of those is Florida, where Republicans are  looking to hold onto a 
Senate seat, avoid a Democratic pickup of the governor's  mansion and have 
targeted four Democratic-held House seats. Another is  Pennsylvania, where 
Republicans could pick up a Senate seat, the governor's  mansion and where 
eight 
Democratic House seats are in play compared with just  one _GOP_ 
(http://projects.washingtonpost.com/politicsglossary/party-affiliated/GOP/) 
-held seat.  
For the past two elections, older voters split their  votes almost evenly 
between Republicans and Democrats in House contests, and  they voted for 
_Sen. John McCain_ (http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/John_McCain)  (R-Ariz.) 
by an eight-point margin in 2008.  Unless Obama can alter the direction of 
this election, older voters appear  likely to tip toward the Republicans this 
year. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to