(http://www.nytimes.com/)  


 
____________________________________
October 22, 2010

Democrats Back Third Parties to Siphon  Votes
By _JIM RUTENBERG_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/jim_rutenberg/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 
 
ORLANDO, Fla. — Seeking any advantage in their effort to retain control of  
Congress, Democrats are working behind the scenes in a number of tight 
races to  bolster long-shot third-party candidates who have platforms at odds 
with the  Democratic agenda but hold the promise of siphoning Republican 
votes.  
The efforts are taking place across the country with varying degrees of  
stealth. And in many cases, they seem to hold as much risk as potential reward 
 for Democrats, prompting accusations of hypocrisy and dirty tricks from  
Republicans and the third-party movements that are on the receiving end of 
the  unlikely, and sometimes unwelcome, support.  
In California, Republicans have received recorded phone calls from a  
professed but unidentified “registered Republican” who says she is voting for  
the American Independent Party’s candidate for a House seat, Bill 
Lussenheide,  not for the incumbent Republican, _Mary Bono_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/mary_bono/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
  
Mack.  
The caller says she is voting that way because “it’s time we show 
Washington  what a true conservative looks like.”  
The recording was openly paid for by the Democratic candidate for the seat, 
 Mayor Steve Pougnet of Palm Springs.  
In Pennsylvania, the Democratic candidate for a suburban Philadelphia House 
 seat, Bryan Lentz, admitted this week that his volunteers helped Jim 
Schneller —  a prominent skeptic of _President Obama_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 ’
s citizenship — collect petitions to  run against Mr. Lentz and his 
Republican opponent, Pat Meehan.  
In Nevada, conservative radio listeners have heard an advertisement 
_promoting the Senate campaign of a “Tea Party of Nevada”  candidate, Scott 
Ashjian_ (
http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/damon-political-report/2010/oct/11/pro-harry-reid-group-out-radio-ad-touting-scott-as/)
 . The ads criticize 
_Sharron Angle_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/a/sharron_angle/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 , the Republican nominee and favored  
candidate of the actual _Tea Party movement_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/t/tea_party_movement/index.html?inline=nyt-class
ifier)  in the race against Senator _Harry Reid_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/harry_reid/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 , 
the Democratic majority leader.  
The ad was sponsored by a group backed by unions and casino and mining  
companies supporting Mr. Reid.  
Nevada is one of several states, including Florida, where “Tea Party”  
political committees have appeared on ballot lines without the knowledge or  
support of leading Tea Party activists, who have generally chosen not to 
support  third-party candidacies. In most of those cases, local bloggers, 
reporters and  lawyers have traced connections to local Democrats, drawing 
lawsuits, complaints  and, in a couple of cases, admissions of involvement.  
“It is one of the dirtiest moves,” said Representative Kevin McCarthy of  
California, a vice chairman of the National Republican Congressional 
Committee.  “It’s not as though the Democrats are playing to compete against 
the 
third party  — they’re helping to build the third party up to make those 
votes not count.”  
Calling it “a concerted effort,” Mr. McCarthy added, “In Congressional 
races,  it could steer the tide for the majority.”  
In response to questions about whether the efforts were being coordinated 
on  a national level, the _Democratic National Committee_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/d/democratic_national_committ
ee/index.html?inline=nyt-org)  said in a statement,  “Republicans have no 
one to blame but their own ideological intolerance for the  bloody civil war 
on their side.”  
Stealth support for third-party candidates who have the potential to cut 
into  the other side’s votes is a time-tested political tradition _for both 
parties_ 
(http://articles.sfgate.com/2004-07-09/news/17435056_1_nader-voters-nader-s-campaign-presidential-candidate-ralph-nader)
 .  
But this year’s efforts are striking for the potency of the grass-roots  
movement that Democrats are trying to use to their advantage — that is, the 
Tea  Party — and for the sometimes brazen nature of the attempts.  
Mr. Pougnet, the Democrat running for Ms. Bono Mack’s House seat in Palm  
Springs, openly discloses his sponsorship of the telephone calls and mailings 
he  is directing to conservative voters labeling Mr. Lussenheide as “the 
Tea Party  candidate” and Ms. Bono Mack as a “raging liberal” by comparison.  
“It’s the strangest thing I’ve ever seen,” Ms. Bono Mack said. “It’s  
desperate, and I think the voters see right through it.”  
Mr. Pougnet’s campaign manager, Jordan Marks, said, “There’s nothing wrong 
 with pointing out to voters who are more conservative that there’s a more  
conservative alternative on the ballot.”  
In other efforts, Democrats have tried to keep a lower profile, though they 
 have not always succeeded.  
In Michigan, local Republicans and Tea Party activists were immediately  
suspicious when a “Tea Party” ballot line appeared with candidates running 
for  two competitive House seats and several state offices. The ballot line 
was  thrown out on a technicality last month, but only after a series of blog 
and  newspaper reports uncovered the hidden hand of two Oakland County 
Democratic  officials. Both men resigned.  
Mr. Lentz’s admission this week that his supporters had a role in placing 
Mr.  Schneller on the ballot in the Pennsylvania House race followed months 
of  suspicion that Mr. Lentz was somehow involved. He had avoided questions 
until  this week, when he _told the editorial board of The Delaware County 
Daily  Times_ 
(http://www.delcotimes.com/articles/2010/10/20/opinion/doc4cbed51454b21107926960.txt)
 , “If somebody’s already made the decision to run, I 
didn’t  think that ‘helping’ with the process of signature petitions was 
improper.”  
Here in Florida, local Republicans and grass-roots Tea Party activists  
continue to press the case that “Tea Party” candidates on the ballot are  
stalking horses for Democrats, an assertion denied by Democrats.  
Polls and independent analysts suggest that the incumbent Democrat in  
Orlando, Representative _Alan Grayson_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/alan_grayson/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 , a firebrand 
liberal whose defeat is  eagerly sought by conservatives, faces an uphill 
fight to keep his seat in what  has been a bitterly fought campaign against his 
Republican rival, Daniel  Webster. But the candidate running on the “Tea 
Party” ballot line in Orlando,  Peg Dunmire, could prove pivotal if Mr. 
Grayson is to pull off a squeaker.  
_The “Tea Party” in Florida_ (http://www.floridateaparty.us/)  was formed 
and registered  with the state in 2009 by an Orlando-area lawyer, Frederic 
B. O’Neal, with help  from a longtime client, Doug Guetzloe, an activist, 
radio host and Republican  operative in a running feud with his party, who has 
earned a reputation as a  political trickster. (On Friday, Mr. Guetzloe was 
sentenced to 60 days in prison  for a misdemeanor campaign violation 
relating to an anonymous political flier he  sent four years ago, but his 
sentence 
does not start until after the election.)  
Tea Party activists in the state said they were flabbergasted to learn of 
the  existence of a “Tea Party” ballot line and Mr. Guetzloe’s involvement 
with it.  
“I didn’t know who the heck these people were,” said Everett Wilkinson, a  
grass-roots activist who has tangled with Mr. Guetzloe and Mr. O’Neal in  
separate lawsuits.  
The grass-roots Tea Party activists and state Republicans, have homed in on 
a  number of connections between Mr. Grayson and Mr. Guetzloe that have 
become  fodder in the local news media, especially in reports on the CBS 
affiliate,  WKMG-TV.  
Mr. Guetzloe serves on two business advisory boards set up by Mr. Grayson. 
A  son of Mr. Guetzloe worked as an intern in Mr. Grayson’s Congressional 
office  last year. _Federal Election Commission_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/federal_election_commission/index.htm
l?inline=nyt-org)  filings show that Mr.  Grayson has paid nearly $50,000 
to a polling firm that was incorporated in late  2008 by an on-and-off 
employee of Mr. Guetzloe, Victoria Torres, who is now  herself running as a 
state 
candidate on the “Tea Party” ballot line that Mr.  Guetzloe helped create.  
In his most recent campaigns, Mr. Grayson advertised on Mr. Guetzloe’s 
local  radio program before it was canceled this year, with some proceeds going 
 
directly to Mr. Guetzloe’s company, including, at least in June, a modest  
commission, station records show.  
Mr. Guetzloe played down his connections to Mr. Grayson, saying that he is  
one of scores of people on Mr. Grayson’s advisory panels and that his son  
secured his internship at Mr. Grayson’s office through his school.  
“This has nothing to do with the _Democratic Party_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/d/democratic_party/index.html?inl
ine=nyt-org) ; it has nothing to do with Alan  Grayson,” said Mr. Guetzloe 
in an interview.  
In an interview outside his house, Mr. Grayson dismissed as “conspiracy  
theories” suggestions that he had any contact with Mr. Guetzloe regarding the  
“Tea Party” ballot line. “The _Republican Party_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/republican_party/index.html?inlin
e=nyt-org)  of Florida wants people to think that  there’s something here,”
 he said. “The old saying where there’s smoke there’s  fire? Here there’s 
not even any smoke.”  
Late last month, in a legal battle between Mr. Guetzloe and grass-roots Tea 
 Party activists who accuse him of hijacking their movement, Wade C. Vose, 
a  local election lawyer representing them, issued a subpoena for Mr. 
Grayson to  sit for a deposition. Mr. Grayson was also ordered to share all 
written or  electronic communications he had had with Mr. Guetzloe, members of 
the 
 registered “Tea Party” and others. That deposition was to take place on  
Thursday.  
Last week, however, Mr. Guetzloe dropped his defamation suit, filed in May, 
 citing procedural wrangling with Mr. Vose — scuttling the order for Mr. 
Grayson  to answer questions.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to