|
From the Carrollton, TX Tea Party group. David To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the
propagation of
ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and
tyrannical.--Thomas -------- Original Message --------
Your friend, Wayne Anderson, has recommended
this article
entitled 'Washington Post Blockbuster Confirms
Worst Fears About
Holder Justice Dept. Race Policies' to you. Here is his/her remark: Washington Post Blockbuster Confirms Worst Fears
About Holder
Justice Dept. Race Policies Congratulations to the editors at the Washington Post.
Seventeen
months after the Eric Holder Justice Department dismissed a
slam-dunk case
against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation, the
Post gets around to printing a thorough vetting of
the dismissal.
The story is slated for Saturday?s print edition. While other
media like
Breitbart/The Bigs, Fox News, the Washington Times, the
Weekly Standard,
Pittsburgh Tribune Review, Investors Business Daily,
Pajamas Media, and
Drudge have had dozens of stories on the corrupt New Black
Panther dismissal,
the Washington Post at last is in the game. The story is a shocker too. The shock comes from the middle
of the road and
factual nature of the story. There are small problems with the story. For one, the Washington
Post
is the only outlet that calls King Samir Shabazz by his old
?slave name?
(Shabazz?s own words) of Maruse Heath. Even Heath doesn?t call
himself Heath.
Of course this takes some of the sting off Shabazz?s rants
against Jews and
calls to kill ?cracker babies in their crib.? The Post?s decision to change a man?s name for him
is
controversial. It has no place. But overall, the story is very bad news for Eric Holder. It
debunks many of
the myths spun by the administration. Inside DOJ sources
describe deep hostility
to protecting whites at Justice. DOJ sources say panther
prosecutor Christian
Adams never allowed his conservative views to influence his
work, contradicting
administration spin. And perhaps most damning of all to
Holder, sources
defending the administration defend the idea that whites
aren?t protected by
the Civil Rights laws. The latter is the blockbuster news in
the Post
piece. The Post also shatters the false administration
spin that only low
level career lawyers had a fight among themselves: ?After the
Obama
administration took over, high-level political appointees
relayed their
thoughts on the case in a stream of internal e-mails in the
days leading to the
dismissal.? The administration told Congress and the public a
lie for over a
year, and now the Washington Post even knows. The Post?s Jerry Markon and Krissah Thompson
write, ?But neighbors
said they view Jackson and Heath ? who declined to comment ?
as annoyances
rather than threats.? What did you expect the neighbors to
say? The Post has a major revelation, the first on the
record
confirmation of the attitude inside the Civil Rights Division
that whites
should not necessarily be protected by the civil rights laws:
This is a startling admission. It is part and parcel of a
wide hostility to
protecting whites who are victims of racial discrimination, as
Christopher
Coates and Adams alleged all along. That admission is a major
mistake for the
administration and should be made well known before the
upcoming election. The Post gathers more gold:
For the first time in any media, the Washington Post
has cracked
sources inside the DOJ familiar with what is going on. Kudos
to the Post
for flushing out more corroboration of the Adams and Coates
testimony. There is this money quote:
So the Post does what nobody has been able to do ?
obtain deep
sourcing inside the Department confirming what Adams and
Coates have been
saying for months. This is a devastating piece of work by the
Washington
Post. This is a rare moment where the old print media
has returned to the
higher standards of years past, and reported facts. A week
from an election, it
couldn?t have come at a worse time for Eric Holder.
Article taken from Big Government - http://biggovernment.com -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org |
Title: To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation
of ideas
which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical
