Houston Chronicle
 
 
Get ready for infighting in wake of GOP landslide

By JONAH GOLDBERG 
Nov. 4,  2010

 
 
Here's some good  news for Democrats who've been blue lately: The coming 
GOP congressional surge  will inevitably lead to a lot of disarray on the 
right. There will be  infighting, bickering and charges of betrayal aplenty. 
The 
tea-infused populists  will bark at — and sometimes bite - the so-called 
elitists. Many in the  Republican establishment will, in turn, show no small 
amount of ingratitude to  the populists who breathed new life into it. 
Now, this might seem like cold  comfort to those liberals who actually 
believed their own hype about President  Obama ushering in what Time magazine 
called a "new liberal order" that was  supposed to last a generation but began 
petering out when Scott Brown won Ted  Kennedy's Senate seat. 
So if liberals will take no  solace from this prediction, perhaps 
conservatives will. You wouldn't know it  from much of the mainstream news 
media 
coverage, which has focused almost  entirely on the tea parties and the GOP, 
but 
the 2010 midterms were never about  the Republicans. Think about how much 
coverage you've seen of Delaware Senate  candidate Christine O'Donnell or New 
York gubernatorial contender Carl Paladino,  two candidates who were always 
long shots at best. Now think how little you've  seen of say, Ron Johnson, 
the Wisconsin rookie politician who defeated Russ  Feingold, the progressive 
lion of the Senate now that Teddy Kennedy is gone.  Johnson is a solid, 
serious, candidate and hence bad copy for a press corps at  least in part eager 
to keep the attention off the Democrats. 
In short, as John Podhoretz  recently wrote in the New York Post, this 
election isn't so much a coronation  for the Republicans as it is a vote of no 
confidence in the Democrats. The  political turmoil on the right, most 
commonly understood as the tea parties  versus the establishment, that we've 
witnessed over the last year was in many  respects a sideshow compared with the 
fact that support of Obama and the  Democrats among independents, moderate 
Republicans, the elderly and, most  recently, among women and low-income 
families, has cratered. Last week's New  York Times/CBS News poll found that 
for 
the first time since 1982, when polling  began, the GOP has the edge among 
women. For the most part, the bulk of these  voters aren't moving to the GOP 
so much as they are fleeing the Democrats. 
And that is why the  Republicans are going to start turning on each other. 
It's the nature of  politics that when you're out of power, everyone can 
agree on what the top  priority should be: Get back in power. But, the only way 
to get back in power is  to attract people who might not share all of your 
goals. Majority coalitions by  definition have diverse groups within them. 
FDR's coalition had everybody from  Klansmen to blacks, socialists to 
industrialists. The new GOP coalition isn't  nearly so exotic, but it does have 
its 
internal contradictions. 
We've had a preview of them in  the Delaware primary fight between 
O'Donnell and Michael Castle. O'Donnell  partisans hold that inside-the-Beltway 
Republicans refused to rally to a  right-wing stalwart. O'Donnell's 
conservative 
critics insist that they are no  less sincere in their principles; they 
simply thought O'Donnell was a risky  choice compared with the comparative sure 
bet the GOP had in Castle to take Joe  Biden's seat. 
The populist vs. establishment  storyline is going to come back with a 
vengeance, particularly given the crowded  field of potential GOP presidential 
contenders. Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee  won't be the only ones writing off 
criticism from Karl Rove or George Will as  "inside the Beltway elitism." 
More important than the  intraconservative fights is the fact that the 
moderates, independents, women and  young people fleeing the Obama coalition to 
make up a new Republican majority  aren't much interested in lending their 
weight to Senate Minority Leader Mitch  McConnell's agenda to make Obama a 
"one-term president." Much like the tea  partiers, they would like to see the 
GOP accomplish something substantive over  the next two years. The arguing 
begins the second the GOP starts acting on that  substance.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to