Effort to  sanitize 'Huck Finn' is pure insanity
Friday, January 07, 2011
By _Tony Norman_ (http://www.post-gazette.com/search/archive.asp?cCat=153) 
,  Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
 
As a society, we've decided that there's nothing more  offensive when it 
comes to educating our young than an unexpurgated look at what  it means to be 
an American. 
In 1884, Samuel Clemens, a cultural DJ who went by the  pen name "Mark 
Twain," dropped some terrifying science about American life  called "The 
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (Tom Sawyer's Comrade)." 
It is a thematically ambitious novel with a problematic  narrative 
structure, but no one has ever written a better satire or a more  truthful 
account 
of race and class in America. It is a magnificent picaresque,  featuring 
bountiful dollops of grace and grotesquery, that continues to resonate  with 
those brave enough to actually read it. 
The novel also features 219 appearances of the word  "nigger," resulting in 
its forced exile to the margins of the high school  curriculum in recent 
years. 
Next month, a new edition of "Huckleberry Finn" that  substitutes the word 
"slave" for the racist epithet _will be published_ 
(http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/45645-upcoming-newso
uth-huck-finn-eliminates-the-n-word.html)  by NewSouth Books "Injun" has 
also been  removed, in keeping with the mission of shielding young minds from 
any knowledge  of America's racist past and self-deceptive present. 
In a misguided attempt to rescue the novel from those  who stupidly accuse 
it of racism, its editor, Auburn University professor Alan  Gribben, has 
rendered it linguistically and morally incoherent. 
Huck, the novel's adolescent narrator, is the illiterate  son of a violent 
backwoods drunk. Fleeing exploitation by his shiftless father,  Huck and his 
newfound companion, Jim, a runaway slave, escape down the  Mississippi 
River on a raft. The story takes place in the 1840s, decades before  the Civil 
War. 
Like most 19th-century Americans, Huck believes whites  are superior to 
blacks, so he initially feels guilty helping Miss Watson's  "property" escape 
to freedom. He lives in a world where racism is the basis for  American 
exceptionalism. 
Once free, Jim's plan is to return to Missouri to rescue  his wife and 
children. His growth from runaway property to full human in Huck's  eyes 
provides the novel with its moral center. 
The novel is famous both for its use of negro dialect  and the unrefined 
tongue of Missouri's white working class. Every character  sounds like Stepin 
Fetchit, which continually mystifies readers who assume  blacks and whites 
are culturally distinct. 
Despite its resemblance to a child's adventure story,  "Huckleberry Finn" 
is a dagger to the heart of white privilege and its  all-pervasive cultural 
assumptions. That's why the racists of Twain's time  despised the book. They 
knew it was a veiled attack. We're too culturally  self-absorbed to see what 
was obvious to them. We're so hung up on a word we  miss the liberating 
speeches. 
In many ways, the sanitized "Huckleberry Finn" is the  flip side of the 
recent controversy over Virginia's school textbooks that  reported two 
battalions of black soldiers fought for the Confederacy. That was a  lie 
concocted 
to protect white Southern self-esteem by making secession look  less like an 
attempt to preserve slavery. 
Who is the intended audience for a sanitized version of  "Huckleberry 
Finn"? Is it the 30 percent to 70 percent of black students who'll  drop out of 
inner city public schools this year? I doubt it. If they're reading  
anything, it's garish urban fiction featuring the epithet in every conceivable  
iteration. 
Is it to spare the delicate sensibilities of the black  kids who remain? 
Unless those kids are also shielded from corporate-owned black  popular 
culture, the epithet will be impossible to dodge outside the  classroom. 
Removing "nigger" from the pages of one of our most  prophetic and 
subversive novels creates a space for even more glibness and  self-deception by 
preserving the conceit that we're a society that doesn't "see"  color. 
Twain once described "Huckleberry Finn" as "a book of  mine where a sound 
heart and a deformed conscience come into collision and  conscience suffers 
defeat." 
It holds a mirror to our times just as it did Twain's.  Like the novel's 
original audience, we're a society that has subconsciously  internalized 
racist assumptions and values, whether we acknowledge it or  not. 
"Huckleberry Finn" is a book about a racist who tried to  grow up in the 
American wilderness. The best many of us can ever hope to be is  as good as 
Huck. What's the point of trying to blunt such a two-edged  sword?


Read more: 
_http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11007/1116193-153.stm#ixzz1ANgIr4FQ_ 
(http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11007/1116193-153.stm#ixzz1ANgIr4FQ) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to