American Spectator
 
_Tea Party vs. United Methodist Church_ 
(http://spectator.org/archives/2011/01/07/tea-party-vs-united-methodist) 
By _Mark Tooley_ (http://spectator.org/people/mark-tooley)  on 1.7.11 @ 
6:07AM 
A prominent Tea Party activist recently called for shutting down the 7.8  
million United Methodist Church, _exciting_ 
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/20/judson-phillips-tea-party-methodist_n_799351.html)
  the Huffington 
Post and various liberal  bloggers. Tea Party Nation President Judson 
Phillips last month saw and disliked  a banner at the Methodist Building on 
Capitol Hill demanding: "Pass the DREAM  Act." The sign referred, of course, to 
now failed legislation seeking to  legalize some illegal aliens brought to the 
U.S. as minors. 
"I have a DREAM," Phillips responded. "That is, no more United  Methodist 
Church." He recalled having left Methodism as a teenager because the  
denomination is "little more than the first Church of Karl Marx" and the  
"'religious arm' of socialism."  
Phillips notes, not inaccurately, that the Methodist denomination,  
officially, is "pro-illegal immigration" and "in the bag for socialist health  
care," opposed U.S. force after 9/11, is big on Global Warming, and is  
anti-Israel.  
"In short, if you hate America, you have a great future in the  Methodist 
church," Phillips concluded, while admitting "some good people" and a  "few 
decent ministers" persist at the "local level." The "few remaining  patriots" 
in Methodism should quit their denomination, he urged. And the Tea  Partier 
observed that his dream of Methodism's death could happen "sooner,  rather 
than later," given the denomination's imploding  demographics.  
One United Methodist bishop responded to Phillips' "visceral attacks,"  
which she said reflected neither "American values nor the Christian faith." But 
 she did pledge to pray for him even while he was dreaming of Methodism's 
demise.  This particular bishop, from Arizona, is especially outspoken for 
Methodism's  virtual open borders advocacy. Ironically, Methodism in Arizona, 
whose state  population is over one third Hispanic, has almost no Hispanic 
congregations.  United Methodism across the U.S. is less than 2 percent 
Hispanic and is  overwhelmingly white Anglo and aging. Once America's largest 
Protestant church,  the denomination has lost over 3 million members, with 
almost no end in sight  for its U.S. section. In contrast, African United 
Methodism is growing rapidly  and will eventually be a majority of the church. 
My own experience growing up Methodist is not dissimilar to Phillips'.  As 
a boy in a 1970s Sunday school class, I never forgot an official United  
Methodist Sunday school lesson focused on the injustice of interning Japanese  
Americans during World War II. Although historically interesting, it did not 
 seem like a Bible lesson. And it did evince that the Religious Left has 
long  commonly portrayed the U.S as a uniquely malevolent force in the world. 
We  didn't have any Sunday school lessons about imperial Japanese 
atrocities, or the  Nazi Holocaust against the Jews. 
If Phillips had visited the Methodist Building 25 years ago, he would  have 
found much more to justify his critique. The nearly 90-year-old prominent  
lobby presence right across from the U.S. Capitol and U.S. Supreme Court 
during  the 1980s was busily advocating on behalf of the Sandinistas, El 
Salvador's  Marxist guerrillas, and numerous other dubious, oppressive causes. 
These  outrageous stances by Methodist and other Mainline Protestant elites,  
effectively siding with totalitarianism during the Cold War, motivated me as 
a  college student to start working for reform in my denomination, 
eventually  leading to my current employment with the Institute on Religion and 
 
Democracy.  
Unlike Phillips seemingly, I did not equate the far left politics of  
denominational elites with the church as a whole. My own local congregation was 
 
conservative leaning and completely unaware of the Methodist lobby office,  
though it stood less than 10 miles away from my Arlington, Virginia church.  
Today, as then, Methodists and most Mainline Protestants are largely 
oblivious  to the official church lobbyists who claim to represent them. One 
poll 
shows  that 14 percent of Tea Partiers are Mainline Protestant. But the 
United  Methodist Church's official support for "single-payer" health care 
prompted U.S.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi publicly to thank the denomination by 
name for  helping to pass Obamacare, shocking many previously oblivious 
church  members. 
The vast array of political stances by United Methodism and many  Mainline 
Protestant groups (Methodism's "Book of Resolutions" has over 1,000  pages) 
are approved mostly without substantive debate at church conventions.  
Non-liberal delegates usually conserve their energy for theological debates.  
Although uninformed, and mostly unsupportive when informed, local church 
members  still fund and are ultimately responsible for the political lobbying 
waged by  their denominations. 
Wishing death for Methodism or other Mainline denominations seems  harsh. 
Wracked by decades of decline, these churches are reaping the whirlwind  of 
nearly 100 years of Social Gospel liberalism. But there remain large pockets  
of orthodoxy and vibrancy. With its large and growing overseas membership,  
United Methodism is especially prone for a comeback, even as its most 
liberal  U.S. regions fade or die. 
A recent survey showed Methodism on the West Coast, where it is most  
liberal, lost almost 8 percent of membership in just four recent years. The 
more  
moderate Southeast U.S. lost only about 1 percent. Overseas African 
churches,  focused on evangelism and not on politics, gained nearly 30 percent 
in 
the same  four-year period. 
Phillips may be correct that demographics ultimately address Methodist  
liberalism. But I pray it's the church's renewal through its growing  
international membership, rather than its demise. And hopefully, a decade from  
now, 
the banners on the Capitol Hill Methodist Building will be less offensive,  
not just to Tea Partiers, but also to most  Methodists.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to