Sounds to me like the UMC should merge with the UCC or even the  Unitarians.
In this town the Disciples are split, one wing still "normal," the other  is
Unitarian in  everything but name. Half, or a third anyway, of  American
Christianity  is in the midst of dissolving  Yet the  "Christians" in that 
third
are clueless about it. What makes people so corrupt ?
 
It would be nice to have an answer that makes good sense.
 
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
 
message dated 1/8/2011 11:16:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:
 
In many places, there is nothing more left that a  United Methodist Church. 

One of the UNC congregations here actually  made joining a "Peace Group" a 
requirement for membership during the  Presidency of George W. Bush. Now 
that we have Obumbles, somehow that is no  longer required. Even though we are 
still fighting in Afghanistan.  

David

 
"I  don't understand why the same newspaper commentators who bemoan the 
terrible  education given to poor people are always so eager to have those poor 
people  get out and  vote."--P.  J. O'Rourke


On 1/7/2011 2:05 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  

American Spectator
 
_Tea Party vs. United Methodist  Church_ 
(http://spectator.org/archives/2011/01/07/tea-party-vs-united-methodist) 
By _Mark Tooley_ (http://spectator.org/people/mark-tooley)  on 1.7.11 @ 
6:07AM 
A prominent Tea Party activist recently called for shutting down the 7.8  
million United Methodist Church, _exciting_ 
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/20/judson-phillips-tea-party-methodist_n_799351.html)
  the Huffington  
Post and various liberal bloggers. Tea Party Nation President Judson  
Phillips last month saw and disliked a banner at the Methodist Building on  
Capitol Hill demanding: "Pass the DREAM Act." The sign referred, of course,  to 
now failed legislation seeking to legalize some illegal aliens brought to  
the U.S. as minors. 
"I have a DREAM," Phillips responded. "That is, no more United  Methodist 
Church." He recalled having left Methodism as a teenager because  the 
denomination is "little more than the first Church of Karl Marx" and the  
"'religious arm' of socialism."  
Phillips notes, not inaccurately, that the Methodist denomination,  
officially, is "pro-illegal immigration" and "in the bag for socialist  health 
care," opposed U.S. force after 9/11, is big on Global Warming, and  is 
anti-Israel.  
"In short, if you hate America, you have a great future in the  Methodist 
church," Phillips concluded, while admitting "some good people"  and a "few 
decent ministers" persist at the "local level." The "few  remaining patriots" 
in Methodism should quit their denomination, he urged.  And the Tea Partier 
observed that his dream of Methodism's death could  happen "sooner, rather 
than later," given the denomination's imploding  demographics.  
One United Methodist bishop responded to Phillips' "visceral  attacks," 
which she said reflected neither "American values nor the  Christian faith." 
But she did pledge to pray for him even while he was  dreaming of Methodism's 
demise. This particular bishop, from Arizona, is  especially outspoken for 
Methodism's virtual open borders advocacy.  Ironically, Methodism in Arizona, 
whose state population is over one third  Hispanic, has almost no Hispanic 
congregations. United Methodism across the  U.S. is less than 2 percent 
Hispanic and is overwhelmingly white Anglo and  aging. Once America's largest 
Protestant church, the denomination has lost  over 3 million members, with 
almost no end in sight for its U.S. section. In  contrast, African United 
Methodism is growing rapidly and will eventually be  a majority of the church. 
My own experience growing up Methodist is not dissimilar to  Phillips'. As 
a boy in a 1970s Sunday school class, I never forgot an  official United 
Methodist Sunday school lesson focused on the injustice of  interning Japanese 
Americans during World War II. Although historically  interesting, it did 
not seem like a Bible lesson. And it did evince that the  Religious Left has 
long commonly portrayed the U.S as a uniquely malevolent  force in the world. 
We didn't have any Sunday school lessons about imperial  Japanese 
atrocities, or the Nazi Holocaust against the Jews. 
If Phillips had visited the Methodist Building 25 years ago, he  would have 
found much more to justify his critique. The nearly 90-year-old  prominent 
lobby presence right across from the U.S. Capitol and U.S. Supreme  Court 
during the 1980s was busily advocating on behalf of the Sandinistas,  El 
Salvador's Marxist guerrillas, and numerous other dubious, oppressive  causes. 
These outrageous stances by Methodist and other Mainline Protestant  elites, 
effectively siding with totalitarianism during the Cold War,  motivated me as 
a college student to start working for reform in my  denomination, 
eventually leading to my current employment with the Institute  on Religion and 
Democracy.  
Unlike Phillips seemingly, I did not equate the far left politics  of 
denominational elites with the church as a whole. My own local  congregation 
was 
conservative leaning and completely unaware of the  Methodist lobby office, 
though it stood less than 10 miles away from my  Arlington, Virginia church. 
Today, as then, Methodists and most Mainline  Protestants are largely 
oblivious to the official church lobbyists who claim  to represent them. One 
poll 
shows that 14 percent of Tea Partiers are  Mainline Protestant. But the 
United Methodist Church's official support for  "single-payer" health care 
prompted U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi publicly  to thank the denomination by 
name for helping to pass Obamacare, shocking  many previously oblivious 
church members. 
The vast array of political stances by United Methodism and many  Mainline 
Protestant groups (Methodism's "Book of Resolutions" has over 1,000  pages) 
are approved mostly without substantive debate at church conventions.  
Non-liberal delegates usually conserve their energy for theological debates.  
Although uninformed, and mostly unsupportive when informed, local church  
members still fund and are ultimately responsible for the political lobbying  
waged by their denominations. 
Wishing death for Methodism or other Mainline denominations seems  harsh. 
Wracked by decades of decline, these churches are reaping the  whirlwind of 
nearly 100 years of Social Gospel liberalism. But there remain  large pockets 
of orthodoxy and vibrancy. With its large and growing overseas  membership, 
United Methodism is especially prone for a comeback, even as its  most 
liberal U.S. regions fade or die. 
A recent survey showed Methodism on the West Coast, where it is  most 
liberal, lost almost 8 percent of membership in just four recent years.  The 
more 
moderate Southeast U.S. lost only about 1 percent. Overseas African  
churches, focused on evangelism and not on politics, gained nearly 30  percent 
in 
the same four-year period. 
Phillips may be correct that demographics ultimately address  Methodist 
liberalism. But I pray it's the church's renewal through its  growing 
international membership, rather than its demise. And hopefully, a  decade from 
now, 
the banners on the Capitol Hill Methodist Building will be  less offensive, 
not just to Tea Partiers, but also to most  Methodists.
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the  Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to