Ayn Rand and Paul Ryan About most of this article I must agree --despite the author's pot shots at the Tea Party. I am at least maginally a Tea Party supporter it should be said by way of self discloure. Which is also to say that I reject the popular media characterization of the Tea Party as a collection of "libertarian zealots," since many are not libertarians at all but are social conservatives, political Independents, or average people simply fed up with corrupt government which effects them personally and in the pocketbbook. This said, I also did some serious thinking about libertarianism this past two months especially after reading Jonah Goldberg. Not so much because he is a shill for libertarianism, but because of issues he raised in "Liberal Fascism." Two factors of consequence, against a background of reinforced respect for libertarian insistence on the value of free speech --no small thing in a world where the mass media regularly distorts the truth, buries the truth, conceals the truth, and trivializes the truth beneath a feel good exterior of pabulum as news, fluff presented as news, and "human interest" stories that are not remotely news stories at all. ( 1 ) Libertarian values contribute to amorality on Wall Street. Yes, Wall Street does not require libertarianism to be unethical --it has been a moral cesspool since at least the mid 19th century-- but libertarianism helps foster a strain of nihilism that has badly eroded common ( Christian derived ) morality. Not exactly a problem to see results of this in 2008 and continuing to today. Blame Freddie and Fanny all you want, blame Bernie Madoff and Ichann and other unsavory individuals, blame corporate greed, blame gluttonous banks, etc, but the bottom line is that all we now have in the financial markets is shadow morality in part because libertarianism regards traditional morality as antiquated and unnecessary since self interest is the only standard we supposedly need. Libertarians may place Ayn Rand in her own category, but I do NOT even if, compared with other libtars, she is sorta like a Mormon compared to other Christians. Still, regardless of idiosyncrasies, Mormons are Christians, not Buddhists or Hindus, and Rand is a libertarian and hardly a Socialist or Mercantilist. ( 2 ) Libertarianism promotes Atheism and undermines Christianity and any other moral religion you can think of. Which is not exactly a mystery given the origins of libertarianism as an offshoot of 60s Left radicalism. That is, it can and often does act as a bridge between belief and so-called secular humanism, something palatable to people who have serious doubts about traditional religion and want to integrate their lives into the modern and socially "liberal" world, for which they see traditional faith as an impediment. Not even to count objections one may make about the questionable economic and political premises of libertarianism. Sorry if these comments offend anyone but this is how things seem as of mid April, 2011. Anyway, while Rand may be extreme by standards of other libertarians, you can see in Randist values and beliefs the excesses those beliefs can be taken to in the Paul Ryan budget plan. I don't buy into the narrative, whole cloth anyway, about how his ideas are "rob the poor to help the rich," but I gotta say that when I first heard the plan described my reaction was that the GOP had just thrown away a really good chance to win in 2012. Basically Ryan, while sound in some particulars, is crazy on balance. And why ? I think the article is right : Because he is a Randist, a doctrinaire whack job who seems to really think that tax cuts for the wealthy are the way to go. There are a number of other objections to his plan that could be discussed but for starters this will do. Billy ===================================================== W Post The Gospel according to Ayn Rand “Then Jesus looked up at his disciples and said:‘Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.’” (Luke 6:20) According to Ayn Rand, the novelist and atheist philosopher so beloved of influential American conservatives today, that’s where Jesus got off track. “There is a great, basic contradiction in the teachings of Jesus,” Rand writes. She argues that when Jesus teaches about “the salvation of one’s soul,” that’s individualism and therefore good. But when it comes to ethics, Jesus goes off the rails. Jesus’ mistake, per Rand, is the idea that, “in order to save one’s soul, one must love or help or live for others.” And that, _Rand concludes_ (http://www.noblesoul.com/orc/texts/jesus.html) , leads to Christianity’s “failure.” Rand, of course, “is _noteworthy for her atheism _ (http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Parille/Ayn_Rand,_Objectivism,_and_Religion_(Part_1_of_4).shtml) and uncompromising opposition to religion.” Ever since Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) put out his draconian budget proposal that slashes essential programs for the poor and gives big_ tax breaks to the rich_ (http://www.newsweek.com/2011/04/10/war-on-the-weak.html) , Ryan’s attachment to the works of Ayn Rand has been in the spotlight. Jonathan Chait, in the pages of Newsweek, calls out Ryan for launching a “_War on the Weak_ (http://www.newsweek.com/2011/04/10/war-on-the-weak.html) ” and explains “How the GOP came to view the poor as parasites –and the rich as our rightful rulers.” The success of this idea that the rich have the right to rule and the poor don’t have any right to their help, is due to the popularity of the philosophy of Ayn Rand on the far right. According to Chait, Ryan is “a Rand nut…Ryan once appeared at a gathering to honor her philosophy, where he announced, ‘The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand.’ He continues to view Rand as a lodestar, requiring his staffers to digest her creepy tracts.” Rev. Jim Wallis takes up the contrast between reading Rand and reading the Bible. He compares her work (and Ryan’s budget) to the biblical prophet Isaiah, and Wallis calls down biblically based wrath on those who make a virtue of crushing the poor. His column, “_Woe to You, Legislators_ (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-wallis/woe-to-you-legislators_b_849300.html) ,” cites Isaiah 10: 1-3. It’s an inspired choice. “Doom to you who legislate evil, who make laws that make victims -- laws that make misery for the poor, that rob my destitute people of dignity, exploiting defenseless widows, taking advantage of homeless children. What will you have to say on Judgment Day, when Doomsday arrives out of the blue? Who will you get to help you? What good will your money do you?” I used to be a big Ayn Rand fan. I admit it. I read all her works and avidly discussed them with friends. I was in high school at the time. It became very clear to me as I experienced a call to the ministry in college that I’ d I have to grow up, give up Rand’s selfish ideas, and begin to recognize that following the Gospel of Jesus Christ meant living for others. Conservative Christians who support the Ryan version of radical conservatism based on the atheist individualist philosophy of Ayn Rand have some serious questions to ask themselves and these questions are long overdue. The political alliance between Christian evangelicals and the tea party has already been analyzed by pollster Robert Jones as a “_shotgun marriage_ (http://onfaith.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/Robert_P_Jones/2010/11/the_shotg un_marriage_of_tea_party_and_evangelicals.html) .” It’s worse than that. Today’s radical conservatism is an unholy and unstable hodgepodge of ideas that are fundamentally alien to each other. This marriage is doomed. Ayn Rand’s atheist hyper-individualism opposed religion in all its forms. The reason is that despite their failure at times to live up to their principles, the world’s religions all have an ethical core that teaches the moral duty human beings have to care for one another. Principled atheism and humanism, it should be noted, share this basic moral value. Rewarding the rich and denying the duty to care for the poor is incompatible with the core teachings of the world’s religions, and with many humanist values, as Greg Epstein describes them in_ Good Without God _ (http://www.amazon.com/Good-Without-God-Billion-Nonreligious/dp/0061670111) , and it is certainly a philosophy opposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ. While I do not agree on certain theological doctrines with many evangelicals, I respect many of them for their on-the-ground commitment to the poor and the vulnerable. Evangelical Christians have read Isaiah, they have read Jesus’_ Sermon on the Mount _ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sermon_on_the_Mount) and they know that Jesus was not mistaken about the ethics of loving one’s neighbor. It is the whole law and the whole gospel. Christian evangelicals who support the Ryan budget that hurts the poor and rewards the rich as the ‘Gospel according to Ayn Rand’ have some soul searching to do and Holy Week is a good time to do that. “For what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly with God?” (Micah 6:8) ======================================================= Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite | Apr 18, 2011
-- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
