Muslim Woman  Seeks to Revive Institution of Sex-Slavery
by Raymond Ibrahim
_FrontPageMagazine.com_ 
(http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/06/muslim-woman-seeks-to-revitalize-the-institution-of-sex-slavery/)
 
June 6, 2011 
_http://www.meforum.org/2930/muslim-woman-seeks-to-revive-institution-of-sex
_ (http://www.meforum.org/2930/muslim-woman-seeks-to-revive-institution
-of-sex)  
Last week witnessed popular Muslim preacher _Abu  Ishaq al-Huwaini_ 
(http://www.raymondibrahim.com/9685/raped-and-ransacked-in-the-muslim-world)  
boast 
about how Islam allows Muslims to buy and sell  conquered infidel women, so 
that "When I want a sex-slave, I go to the market  and pick whichever 
female I desire and buy her." 
This week's depraved anachronism comes from a  Muslim woman—Salwa 
al-Mutairi, a political activist and former parliamentary  candidate for 
Kuwait's 
government, no less: She, too, seeks to "revive the  institution of 
sex-slavery." 
A brief English report appeared over the weekend  in the _Kuwait  Times_ 
(http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=NzQ3NzY0MzE=)  (nothing, of 
course, in the MSM): 

Muslim men who fear being seduced or tempted  into immoral behavior by the 
beauty of their female servants, or even of those  servants "casting spells" 
on them, would be better to purchase women from an  "enslaved maid" agency 
for sexual purposes. She [Mutairi] suggested that  special offices could be 
set up to provide concubines in the same way as  domestic staff recruitment 
agencies currently provide housemaids. "We want our  youth to be protected 
from adultery," said al-Mutairi, suggesting that these  maids could be 
brought as prisoners of war in war-stricken nations like  Chechnya to be sold 
on 
later to devout merchants.
The Arabic news website, _Al Arabiya_ 
(http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/04/151770.html) ,  has the sordid 
details, including a video of 
Mutairi addressing this topic. I  summarize and translate various excerpts 
below 
(note: I am not making any  of this up): 
The Kuwaiti female activist begins by insisting  that "it's of course true" 
that "the prophet of Islam legitimized sex-slavery."  She recounts how when 
she was in Mecca, Islam's holiest city, she asked various  sheikhs and 
muftis (learned, authoritative Muslims) about the legality of  sex-slavery 
according to Sharia: they all confirmed it to be perfectly legal;  Kuwaiti 
ulema 
further pointed out that extra "virile" men—Western synonymous  include 
"sex-crazed," "lecherous," "perverted"—would do well to purchase  sex-slaves to 
sate their appetites without sinning. 
Here's a particularly interesting excerpt from her  taped speech on the 
rules governing sex-slaves: 
A Muslim state must [first] attack a Christian  state—sorry, I mean any 
non-Muslim state—and they [the women, the future  sex-slaves] must be captives 
of the raid. Is this forbidden? Not at all;  according to Islam, sex slaves 
are not at all forbidden. Quite the contrary,  the rules regulating 
sex-slaves differ from those for free women [i.e., Muslim  women]: the latter's 
body 
must be covered entirely, except for her face and  hands, whereas the 
sex-slave is kept naked from the bellybutton on up—she is  different from the 
free woman; the free woman has to be married properly to  her husband, but the 
sex-slave—he just buys her and that's  that.
She went on to offer concrete suggestions: "For  example, in the Chechnyan 
war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go  and buy those and sell 
them here in Kuwait; better that than have our men engage  in forbidden 
sexual relations. I don't see any problem in this, no problem at  all." 
Mutairi suggests the enslaved girls be at least 15  years-old. 
She further justified the institution of  sex-slavery by evoking 8th 
century caliph, Harun Rashid—a name some  may recall from Arabian Nights 
bedtime 
stories; a name some may be  surprised to discover politically active Muslims 
modeling their lives after: 
"And the greatest example we have is Harun  al-Rashid: when he died, he had 
2,000 sex slaves—so it's okay, nothing wrong  with it." 
Mutairi's rationale is ultimately guided by a  sense of efficiency, a 
desire for the good of society: legalizing sex-slaves  helps prevent Muslim men 
from transgressing Allah's laws (as we have seen,  extramarital relations 
with fellow Muslim women is strictly forbidden, but not  with infidel 
sex-slaves, since they are _scarcely  considered human_ 
(http://www.raymondibrahim.com/7425/islam-slave-girls-animals) ). Thus, the 
institution of sex-slavery 
provides a  convenient, Sharia-compliant way of satiating the libidinous urges 
of Muslim  men. 
The Kuwaiti activist's blunt approach has  universal parallels. For 
example, in the West, some seek to legalize marijuana,  arguing that, since 
people 
use it anyway, let it be made compliant with the law.  In the Muslim world, 
some seek to legalize sex-slavery, arguing that, since  Muslim men will use 
women anyway, let it be made compliant with Sharia law. 
Such are the inevitable differences between the  Western mindset (based on 
reason and universal rights) and the Sharia mindset  (based on the life of a 
7th century _Arabian  caravan-raider and slave-trader_ 
(http://www.raymondibrahim.com/7361/respecting-faithful-respecting-faith) ). 
Mutairi concluded by piously supplicating Allah:  "Oh I truly wish this for 
Kuwait, Allah willing—Oh Lord, Lord, you are  bountiful…" 
While she waits, Mutairi can take solace in the  fact that, if sex-slavery 
is not institutionalized in Kuwait, it thrives  underground throughout the 
Muslim world, where non-Muslim girls—mostly  Christians—are routinely 
abducted, enslaved, and forced into lives of  unspeakable degradation. 
After all, just because a practice is not formally  institutionalized does 
not mean that those who deem it their divine right are  not practicing it. 
_Raymond  Ibrahim_ (http://www.meforum.org/staff/Raymond+Ibrahim)  is 
associate director of the Middle East  Forum

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to