I have got to remember to include ;-)
 
 
 
message dated 6/7/2011 5:51:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

A curious lack of tolerance for any other religion.  

I believe that you have yourself spoken of many problems with the  Koran. 
Do you want me to recycle some of your old posts? :-) 

David

  _   
 
"There  is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in  advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and 
"sensitive"  because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is 
merely  saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's 
money. Well,  who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting such 
programs 
is telling  us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a gun is held to 
his  head."--P. J.  O'Rourke


On 6/7/2011 12:48 AM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
 
Besides that, what other problems do you have with the Perfect Word of  
Allah ?
 
Curious in Oregon
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
 
 
message dated 6/6/2011 10:10:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   writes:

To answer the  subject line question: Almost everything. 

David

  _   
 
"There  is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in  advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and  
"sensitive" because he wants to expand the government's charitable  programs is 
merely saying that he's willing to try to do good with other  people's 
money. Well, who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting  such 
programs 
is telling us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a  gun is held to 
his head."--P. J.  O'Rourke


On 6/6/2011 11:37 PM,  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   wrote:  

 
Muslim  Woman Seeks to Revive Institution of Sex-Slavery
by Raymond Ibrahim
_FrontPageMagazine.com_ 
(http://frontpagemag.com/2011/06/06/muslim-woman-seeks-to-revitalize-the-institution-of-sex-slavery/)
 
June 6,  2011 
_http://www.meforum.org/2930/muslim-woman-seeks-to-revive-institution-of-sex
_ 
(http://www.meforum.org/2930/muslim-woman-seeks-to-revive-institution-of-sex)  
Last week witnessed popular Muslim  preacher _Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini_ 
(http://www.raymondibrahim.com/9685/raped-and-ransacked-in-the-muslim-world)  
boast 
about how Islam  allows Muslims to buy and sell conquered infidel women, so 
that "When I  want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever 
female I desire  and buy her." 
This week's depraved anachronism comes  from a Muslim woman—Salwa 
al-Mutairi, a political activist and former  parliamentary candidate for 
Kuwait's 
government, no less: She, too,  seeks to "revive the institution of 
sex-slavery." 
A brief English report appeared over the  weekend in the _Kuwait Times_ 
(http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=NzQ3NzY0MzE=)  (nothing, of 
course, in the  MSM): 


Muslim men who fear being seduced or  tempted into immoral behavior by the 
beauty of their female servants,  or even of those servants "casting spells" 
on them, would be better to  purchase women from an "enslaved maid" agency 
for sexual purposes. She  [Mutairi] suggested that special offices could be 
set up to provide  concubines in the same way as domestic staff recruitment 
agencies  currently provide housemaids. "We want our youth to be protected 
from  adultery," said al-Mutairi, suggesting that these maids could be  
brought as prisoners of war in war-stricken nations like Chechnya to  be sold 
on 
later to devout merchants.
The Arabic news website, _Al Arabiya_ 
(http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/06/04/151770.html) , has the sordid 
details, including  a video of 
Mutairi addressing this topic. I summarize and translate  various excerpts 
below 
(note: I am not making any of this  up): 
The Kuwaiti female activist begins by  insisting that "it's of course true" 
that "the prophet of Islam  legitimized sex-slavery." She recounts how when 
she was in Mecca,  Islam's holiest city, she asked various sheikhs and 
muftis (learned,  authoritative Muslims) about the legality of sex-slavery 
according to  Sharia: they all confirmed it to be perfectly legal; Kuwaiti 
ulema  
further pointed out that extra "virile" men—Western synonymous include  
"sex-crazed," "lecherous," "perverted"—would do well to purchase  sex-slaves to 
sate their appetites without sinning. 
Here's a particularly interesting excerpt  from her taped speech on the 
rules governing sex-slaves: 
A Muslim state must [first] attack a  Christian state—sorry, I mean any 
non-Muslim state—and they [the  women, the future sex-slaves] must be captives 
of the raid. Is this  forbidden? Not at all; according to Islam, sex slaves 
are not at all  forbidden. Quite the contrary, the rules regulating 
sex-slaves differ  from those for free women [i.e., Muslim women]: the latter's 
body 
must  be covered entirely, except for her face and hands, whereas the  
sex-slave is kept naked from the bellybutton on up—she is different  from the 
free woman; the free woman has to be married properly to her  husband, but the 
sex-slave—he just buys her and that's  that.
She went on to offer concrete suggestions:  "For example, in the Chechnyan 
war, surely there are female Russian  captives. So go and buy those and sell 
them here in Kuwait; better that  than have our men engage in forbidden 
sexual relations. I don't see any  problem in this, no problem at all." 
Mutairi suggests the enslaved girls be at  least 15 years-old. 
She further justified the institution of  sex-slavery by evoking 8th 
century caliph, Harun Rashid—a  name some may recall from Arabian Nights 
bedtime 
stories; a name  some may be surprised to discover politically active Muslims 
modeling  their lives after: 
"And the greatest example we have is Harun  al-Rashid: when he died, he had 
2,000 sex slaves—so it's okay, nothing  wrong with it." 
Mutairi's rationale is ultimately guided  by a sense of efficiency, a 
desire for the good of society: legalizing  sex-slaves helps prevent Muslim men 
from transgressing Allah's laws (as  we have seen, extramarital relations 
with fellow Muslim women is  strictly forbidden, but not with infidel 
sex-slaves, since they are _scarcely considered human_ 
(http://www.raymondibrahim.com/7425/islam-slave-girls-animals) ). Thus, the  
institution of sex-slavery 
provides a convenient, Sharia-compliant way  of satiating the libidinous urges 
of Muslim men. 
The Kuwaiti activist's blunt approach has  universal parallels. For 
example, in the West, some seek to legalize  marijuana, arguing that, since 
people 
use it anyway, let it be made  compliant with the law. In the Muslim world, 
some seek to legalize  sex-slavery, arguing that, since Muslim men will use 
women anyway, let  it be made compliant with Sharia law. 
Such are the inevitable differences  between the Western mindset (based on 
reason and universal rights) and  the Sharia mindset (based on the life of a 
7th century _Arabian caravan-raider and slave-trader_ 
(http://www.raymondibrahim.com/7361/respecting-faithful-respecting-faith) ). 
Mutairi concluded by piously supplicating  Allah: "Oh I truly wish this for 
Kuwait, Allah willing—Oh Lord, Lord,  you are bountiful…" 
While she waits, Mutairi can take solace  in the fact that, if sex-slavery 
is not institutionalized in Kuwait, it  thrives underground throughout the 
Muslim world, where non-Muslim  girls—mostly Christians—are routinely 
abducted, enslaved, and forced  into lives of unspeakable degradation. 
After all, just because a practice is not  formally institutionalized does 
not mean that those who deem it their  divine right are not practicing it. 
_Raymond Ibrahim_ (http://www.meforum.org/staff/Raymond+Ibrahim)  is 
associate  director of the Middle East Forum

--  
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

--  
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to