_Informed  Comment_ (http://www.juancole.com/)  
 
(http://fusion.google.com/add?source=atgs&feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.com/juancole/ymbn)
 
 
____________________________________
_Is an Iranian Drug Cartel Behind the Assassination Plot against the  Saudi 
Ambassador?_ 
(http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/juancole/ymbn/~3/kfu3cfAD1AI/is-an-iranian-drug-cartel-behind-the-assassination-plot-against-the-saudi-amba
ssador.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email)   
Posted:  12 Oct 2011 12:38 AM PDT 
 
As many observers have pointed out, the story given us by Attorney  General 
Eric Holder about the alleged Iranian plot to assassinate the  Saudi 
ambassador in Washington, D.C., makes no sense. _Veteran  CIA operative Bob 
Baer, 
now retired, notes that Iranian intelligence_ 
(http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-12/ex-cia-warns-us-dangerously-wrong-on-iran/3553704?section=world)
   
is highly professional and works independently or through trusted proxies,  
and this sloppy operation simply is not their modus operandi. 
The US is alleging that Gholam Shakuri, a known member of the Quds  
Brigade, the special operations force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards  
Corps, 
was involved and that he was running an Iranian-American agent,  Manssor 
Arbabsiar, a _used  car dealer with a conviction on check fraud_ 
(http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/suspect-saudi-ambassador-plot-texas-ties-14717301)
 . 
Arbabsiar wired $100,000  to a bank account he thought belonged to a member of 
the Zeta Mexican drug  cartel, as a down payment on the $1.5 million 
demanded by the cartel  member for carrying out the assassination.  
If Arbabsiar really had been an Iranian intelligence asset, he would  have 
been informed if there’s one thing the US typically monitors, it is  money 
transfers of more than $10,000 (as a measure against drug money  laundering). 
The only safe way to undertake this transaction would have  been cash, and 
no one in the Quds Brigade is so stupid as not to know this  simple reality. 
Moreover, would the Quds Brigade really depend so heavily  on someone with 
a fraud conviction, who was therefore known to US  authorities? Expert 
terrorism deploys “newskins” people who can fly under  the radar of police and 
security forces. 
One possibility as to what is really going on here is _signaled  by the 
Bloomberg_ 
(http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/10/11/bloomberg_articlesLSXPP00D9L38.DTL)
  report in the San Francisco Chronicle: 
” Arbabsiar also told the informant that the same Iranian sponsors  behind 
the assassination plot also controlled drug smuggling and could  provide 
tons of opium, the federal law enforcement official  said.”
In other words, Arbabsiar’s patron, Shakuri, may have had a side  business, 
besides the Revolutionary Guards day job, as an element in _an  opium- and 
heroin-running gang bringing the stuff from Afghanistan_ 
(http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2007/February/Opium110/index.html)   through 
Iran and to points 
west. About half of Afghanistan’s opium and  heroin is exported via Iran. 
If a rogue Iranian drug cartel with an IRGC cover wanted to hit the  Saudi 
ambassador, then it would be natural for them to reach out to their  
counterparts, the Zetas in Mexico. Whereas if the Iranian state wanted to  
assassinate someone, it would be crazy for them to reveal themselves to a  
Mexican 
gangster. 
So why hit the Saudis? If it was an Iranian cartel, they might be  annoyed 
with the Saudi version of the _war on drugs_ 
(http://arabnews.com/saudiarabia/article363828.ece) .  After all, some of their 
colleagues may have gotten 
caught in the dragnet.  Or they might be angered that Saudi-backed Sunni 
militant gangs in Iraq  and Syria have grabbed smuggling routes, cutting out 
the Iranians. _ 
Of course, we cannot rule out the possibility_ 
(http://www.tni.org/archives/pin-docs_220976-1)  of a direct Iranian  
government plot. After all, 
Chilean dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet  assassinated dissident (and former 
ambassador) Orlando Letelier in  Washington, DC in 1976. 
Iranian and Saudi relations have been roiled by the turmoil in Syria,  with 
with the Saudis supporting the opposition. In Bahrain the Saudis  helped 
crush the movement toward greater openness, angering Iranians. And,  the 
wikileaks cables demonstrate that the Saudis behind the scenes  repeatedly 
urged 
the US to hit Iran. There is something like a cold war  between the two 
regional powers, and this plot could be part of it. But I  agree with Baer that 
it looks too much like amateur hour to likely be the  doings of the Iranian 
government per  se.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to