Philosophy News Service
 
30. August 2011 
 
_The Value of Philosophy_ 
(http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2011/08/30/The-Value-of-Philosophy.aspx) 
By : Paul Pardi

 
To many, philosophy* is an obscure and largely outdated discipline that has 
 little relevance in the real world. I’ve taught an introductory philosophy 
 course for many years and many of my students come into the course with 
the idea  that philosophy is little more than opinions wrapped in big words 
and focuses on  topics that have no bearing on practical matters like paying 
for school or  landing a job. So what’s the point? Why do people study 
philosophy and what, if  any, value does it have?  
I’ve found the study of philosophy to be life changing. This isn’t a 
slogan  for me. Philosophy has proven to be immensely satisfying and valuable. 
Here are  seven reasons why. 
It broadens my world
Like the freed prisoner in Plato’s _allegory_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4XXItJYFKA&feature=player_embedded#!)   of the 
_cave_ 
(http://public.wsu.edu/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_1/plato.html) 
,  studying 
philosophy forced me to think differently about the world around me.  Prior to 
studying philosophy, the world was simple, dogmatism came cheap, and  
frankly, the world was pretty bland. Don’t get me wrong, simplicity is great  
when 
things are simple. Few of us seek to make life needlessly more complicated. 
 But complexity can actually be quite wonderful when it opens up new 
vistas. As  I’ve aged, I’ve learned to appreciate fine cooking and all the 
adornments that  go along with it (like a good wine and an enveloping 
atmosphere). 
As many an  epicurean will tell you, the best cooking is generally not 
simple cooking.  Tasting excellent food that has layers of perfectly balanced 
flavors that were  prepared over hours or days and that come alive with the 
right wine or a  hand-crafted bread is among the most enriching experiences 
one can have.  Philosophy does the same for me with ideas. Getting past the 
boxed  mac-and-cheese simple answers to a feast of nuanced philosophy is, 
simply,  wonderful. 
It trains my mind
The mind is in many ways like a muscle. It needs to be exercised, 
stretched,  and pushed to the limit to be at its best. Philosophy can be very 
tough. 
As  Alvin Plantinga has said, “Philosophy is just thinking hard.” 
Philosophy as a  discipline has forced me to think more precisely and 
carefully. It 
is teaching  me how to frame problems and where to go to make better sense of 
those problems.  It always pushes me to be a better thinker. For me, there 
was an unexpected  outcome to stretching my mind to my intellectual limits. 
It makes many of the  more mundane, daily challenges I face much easier to 
handle. Training your body  to bench press two hundred pounds makes opening 
the pickle jar quite a bit  easier. 
It continually challenges me
This probably goes without saying and is closely related to the point 
above.  Philosophy is challenging not only because it tackles hard problems, 
but 
because  it unrelenting in its demand for clarity. A friend of mine who was 
struggling  with the question of God’s existence once expressed exasperation 
with the  unsettled nature of the philosophical literature on the question. 
“If you read a  good argument for one position one month, the next month 
there will be three  journal articles with counterarguments that show why the 
first argument was  wrong.” This constant dialogue with no clear end can be 
very frustrating. But it  also forces us to learn how to evaluate what we’re 
thinking about and synthesize  it. This challenge is something I find 
invigorating. I expect it to last a  lifetime. 
It makes me careful
One of the greatest lessons I’m learning from studying philosophy is that  
there are very few easy answers to life’s intractable problems. Philosophy 
has  pushed me to labor over the nuance of a word or phrase. It encourages me 
to  constantly challenge my assumptions and to slow down and be patient 
while  looking for something that might resemble an answer. Finishing a great 
book in  philosophy most of the time means concluding with more questions 
than I started  with. While this can sound frustrating to some, it has brought 
a great deal of  peace to me. I’m learning that when it comes to ideas, the 
journey is quite a  bit more enjoyable than the destination. 
It changes my point of view
There’s a popular bumper sticker that reads, “Hire a teenager while he 
still  knows everything.” It’s funny--at least to everyone but 
teenagers--because with  age we come to learn that life is nuanced and requires 
changing 
our minds about  a great many things. Philosophy provides the means by which I 
can consider view  points I would not otherwise consider and to look in a 
different way at problems  I once thought were solved. Think of where’d you’
d be if you still believed all  the things you were certain of when you were 
twelve. Healthy change generally  means growth and that’s a good thing. 
It tempers dogmatism
I’m learning that dogmatism may partly be rooted in a desire to be secure.  
While security generally is something to be prized, when it comes to the 
life of  the mind, too much security can actually be a detriment. Because 
logic is so  central to philosophy, it’s natural to think that intellectual 
problems all have  hard-and-fast logical outcomes and the goal is to find those 
irrefutable  conclusions. If this were the case, dogmatism would be hard to 
avoid. But  philosophy, taken holistically, has led me in the opposite 
direction. The  ambiguity of words, the fuzzy nature of our knowledge of the 
truth of many  facts, the influence of the passions and desires, the 
imprecision 
of experience,  and the obvious limitations of our mind should introduce a 
great deal of  intellectual humility and tentativeness to our worldview. 
Philosophy as a  discipline (and, in my opinion, when done properly) exposes 
both the power and  the limitations of logic. As G.K. Chesterton rightly 
observed, “The madman is  not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is 
the 
man who has lost  everything except his reason.” 
It puts things in perspective
As I alluded to above, philosophy is teaching me how to understand the  
relative importance of ideas. It’s all too easy to view every idea as equally  
important and to want to “go to the mat” for every idea we find 
disagreeable.  But by having to go deep on concepts, I’ve learned that some 
ideas are 
worth  wrestling with and others are not. There are a lot of very interesting 
ideas to  labor over, argue about, and spend time on. There are a lot of 
others that  aren’t. Philosophy is helping me figure out which are which.  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
Paul Pardi's Experience 

 
 
 
 (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-pardi/9/8a4/b92#name)  
 
Senior Content Publishing  Lead 
_Microsoft Corporation_ 
(http://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft?trk=ppro_cprof)  

Public Company; MSFT;  Computer Software industry  
March 2009 – Present (2 years 8 months)  
I manage a high-performing team of  content authors who work on web and 
in-box content for Windows, Windows Live,and  Internet Explorer content. I am 
responsible for the content development for  Microsoft's web browser 
including the online help content and site pages. This  content reaches over 10 
million visitors a month and has had consistently strong  customer 
satisfaction. 
My content development team are innovators who reach  millions of customers 
with their content and ideas. 

 
 (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-pardi/9/8a4/b92#name)  
 
Owner 
Edenic Software 

Computer Software  industry  
January 2007 – March 2009 (2 years 3 months)  
I built custom, line of business  applications for small and medium 
businesses. I developed in Silverlight, WPF,  C#, ASP.net, and javascript. In 
addition to software developement I worked with  a partner company to develop 
certified content for Microsoft that was delivered  across the globe. 

 
 (http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-pardi/9/8a4/b92#name)  
 
Development Manager 
_Microsoft_ (http://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft?trk=ppro_cprof)  

Public Company; MSFT;  Computer Software industry  
June 1997 – January 2007 (9 years 8 months)  
I managed a team of software development  engineers. We were responsible 
for building the software engine that powered the  Microsoft e-Learning 
Library which also shipped as the help system for Windows  XP Starter Edition. 
Over 800 titles (including localized versions) were  delivered to customers in 
this software. 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to