Do people still use Perl? I figured that Perl programming is another discipline, like philosophy, that had seen its better days. But I have been out of the programming world so long that I really don't know.
Chris From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dr. Ernie Prabhakar Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 3:17 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RC] Philosophy and Computers Hi Billy, My only disagreement is that this covers the value of *studying* Philosophy. To me, Philosophy is like Perl -- something you want to study to understand how smart people solve the wrong problems the right way, and the wrong problems the right way, but not something you'd actually use directly. -- Ernie P. On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:02 PM, [email protected] wrote: Philosophy News Service 30. August 2011 <http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2011/08/30/The-Value-of-Philosophy.aspx> The Value of Philosophy By : Paul Pardi To many, philosophy* is an obscure and largely outdated discipline that has little relevance in the real world. I've taught an introductory philosophy course for many years and many of my students come into the course with the idea that philosophy is little more than opinions wrapped in big words and focuses on topics that have no bearing on practical matters like paying for school or landing a job. So what's the point? Why do people study philosophy and what, if any, value does it have? I've found the study of philosophy to be life changing. This isn't a slogan for me. Philosophy has proven to be immensely satisfying and valuable. Here are seven reasons why. It broadens my world Like the freed prisoner in Plato's allegory <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4XXItJYFKA&feature=player_embedded#!> of the cave <http://public.wsu.edu/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_1/plato.htm l> , studying philosophy forced me to think differently about the world around me. Prior to studying philosophy, the world was simple, dogmatism came cheap, and frankly, the world was pretty bland. Don't get me wrong, simplicity is great when things are simple. Few of us seek to make life needlessly more complicated. But complexity can actually be quite wonderful when it opens up new vistas. As I've aged, I've learned to appreciate fine cooking and all the adornments that go along with it (like a good wine and an enveloping atmosphere). As many an epicurean will tell you, the best cooking is generally not simple cooking. Tasting excellent food that has layers of perfectly balanced flavors that were prepared over hours or days and that come alive with the right wine or a hand-crafted bread is among the most enriching experiences one can have. Philosophy does the same for me with ideas. Getting past the boxed mac-and-cheese simple answers to a feast of nuanced philosophy is, simply, wonderful. It trains my mind The mind is in many ways like a muscle. It needs to be exercised, stretched, and pushed to the limit to be at its best. Philosophy can be very tough. As Alvin Plantinga has said, "Philosophy is just thinking hard." Philosophy as a discipline has forced me to think more precisely and carefully. It is teaching me how to frame problems and where to go to make better sense of those problems. It always pushes me to be a better thinker. For me, there was an unexpected outcome to stretching my mind to my intellectual limits. It makes many of the more mundane, daily challenges I face much easier to handle. Training your body to bench press two hundred pounds makes opening the pickle jar quite a bit easier. It continually challenges me This probably goes without saying and is closely related to the point above. Philosophy is challenging not only because it tackles hard problems, but because it unrelenting in its demand for clarity. A friend of mine who was struggling with the question of God's existence once expressed exasperation with the unsettled nature of the philosophical literature on the question. "If you read a good argument for one position one month, the next month there will be three journal articles with counterarguments that show why the first argument was wrong." This constant dialogue with no clear end can be very frustrating. But it also forces us to learn how to evaluate what we're thinking about and synthesize it. This challenge is something I find invigorating. I expect it to last a lifetime. It makes me careful One of the greatest lessons I'm learning from studying philosophy is that there are very few easy answers to life's intractable problems. Philosophy has pushed me to labor over the nuance of a word or phrase. It encourages me to constantly challenge my assumptions and to slow down and be patient while looking for something that might resemble an answer. Finishing a great book in philosophy most of the time means concluding with more questions than I started with. While this can sound frustrating to some, it has brought a great deal of peace to me. I'm learning that when it comes to ideas, the journey is quite a bit more enjoyable than the destination. It changes my point of view There's a popular bumper sticker that reads, "Hire a teenager while he still knows everything." It's funny--at least to everyone but teenagers--because with age we come to learn that life is nuanced and requires changing our minds about a great many things. Philosophy provides the means by which I can consider view points I would not otherwise consider and to look in a different way at problems I once thought were solved. Think of where'd you'd be if you still believed all the things you were certain of when you were twelve. Healthy change generally means growth and that's a good thing. It tempers dogmatism I'm learning that dogmatism may partly be rooted in a desire to be secure. While security generally is something to be prized, when it comes to the life of the mind, too much security can actually be a detriment. Because logic is so central to philosophy, it's natural to think that intellectual problems all have hard-and-fast logical outcomes and the goal is to find those irrefutable conclusions. If this were the case, dogmatism would be hard to avoid. But philosophy, taken holistically, has led me in the opposite direction. The ambiguity of words, the fuzzy nature of our knowledge of the truth of many facts, the influence of the passions and desires, the imprecision of experience, and the obvious limitations of our mind should introduce a great deal of intellectual humility and tentativeness to our worldview. Philosophy as a discipline (and, in my opinion, when done properly) exposes both the power and the limitations of logic. As G.K. Chesterton rightly observed, "The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason." It puts things in perspective As I alluded to above, philosophy is teaching me how to understand the relative importance of ideas. It's all too easy to view every idea as equally important and to want to "go to the mat" for every idea we find disagreeable. But by having to go deep on concepts, I've learned that some ideas are worth wrestling with and others are not. There are a lot of very interesting ideas to labor over, argue about, and spend time on. There are a lot of others that aren't. Philosophy is helping me figure out which are which. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Pardi's Experience Senior Content Publishing Lead <http://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft?trk=ppro_cprof> Microsoft Corporation Public Company; MSFT; Computer Software industry March 2009 - Present (2 years 8 months) I manage a high-performing team of content authors who work on web and in-box content for Windows, Windows Live,and Internet Explorer content. I am responsible for the content development for Microsoft's web browser including the online help content and site pages. This content reaches over 10 million visitors a month and has had consistently strong customer satisfaction. My content development team are innovators who reach millions of customers with their content and ideas. Owner Edenic Software Computer Software industry January 2007 - March 2009 (2 years 3 months) I built custom, line of business applications for small and medium businesses. I developed in Silverlight, WPF, C#, ASP.net, and javascript. In addition to software developement I worked with a partner company to develop certified content for Microsoft that was delivered across the globe. Development Manager <http://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft?trk=ppro_cprof> Microsoft Public Company; MSFT; Computer Software industry June 1997 - January 2007 (9 years 8 months) I managed a team of software development engineers. We were responsible for building the software engine that powered the Microsoft e-Learning Library which also shipped as the help system for Windows XP Starter Edition. Over 800 titles (including localized versions) were delivered to customers in this software. -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org <http://RadicalCentrism.org/> -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
