Real Clear Politics
 
October 25, 2011  
Are Evangelicals or University Professors More  Irrational?
By _Dennis  Prager_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Dennis+Prager&id=15115) 

Last week, The New York Times published an opinion piece by Karl W. 
Giberson  and Randall J. Stephens, a physics professor and history professor at 
Eastern  Nazarene College, respectively. The authors take evangelicals to task 
for being  anti-intellectual, anti-reason and anti-science. Their evidence: 
-- Evangelicals doubt man-made global warming,

 
-- Evangelicals believe that gays can "pray away" their homosexuality. 
-- Evangelicals believe Earth is only thousands of years old and that men  
lived alongside dinosaurs. 
-- Evangelicals oppose same-sex marriage. 
Given how often they are made, it's worth analyzing these charges. 
With regard to man-made global warming, the accusation that all skeptics 
are  anti-science is despicable and, indeed, anti-science. The list of 
prominent  scientists who dissent -- including the scientist widely considered 
the 
dean of  climate science in America, Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts 
Institute of  Technology -- is so long that there are entire websites that 
feature their names  and credentials: There's a Wikipedia page titled "List of 
Scientists opposing  the mainstreat scientific assessment of global warming" 
and a website called  PetitionProject.org. 
The authors of the Times op-ed piece, like virtually all other left-wing  
intellectuals who comment on the subject, dismiss all skepticism regarding 
the  Al Gore hypothesis that humanity is headed toward a worldwide apocalypse 
due to  heat resulting from man-made carbon emissions. This is a reflection 
on these  intellectuals' politics, not on their commitment to science. 
With regard to "praying away" homosexuality -- if it is indeed the 
normative  evangelical position that all gays, with the right faith, can cease 
being 
 sexually attracted to the same sex -- that position is wrong. But to the 
best of  my knowledge, that is not the normative evangelical position; 
evangelicals  believe that no more than they believe that prayer alone will end 
any undesired  physical condition. 
At the same time, the opposite position -- the position of nearly all the  
liberal intellectual world -- that everyone's sexual orientation is fixed is 
a  position also driven by ideology rather than by science. Society has a 
huge  influence on how people act out their sexuality, including the gender 
of person  with whom they choose to be sexual. Human sexuality -- especially 
female -- is  far more elastic than the intellectual community admits. And 
the widespread  liberal belief that, all things being equal, it makes no 
difference whether a  child is raised by a mother and father or by two fathers 
or two mothers is  hardly rational. On the issue of homosexuality, the 
intellectual left is just as  driven by ideology as evangelicals. 
With regard to those evangelicals -- and for that matter, those  
ultra-orthodox Jews -- who believe that Earth is less than 10,000 years old and 
 that 
there either were no dinosaurs or that they lived alongside human beings,  
my reaction has always been: So what? I believe that Earth is many millions 
of  years old, that "six days" is meant as six periods of time (the sun 
wasn't even  created until the third day, so how could there have been any days 
before then?)  and that dinosaurs preexisted man by millions of years. 
But what real-life problem is caused by people who believe otherwise? Does 
it  affect any of their important behaviors in life? Do they not take their 
children  to doctors? Do they oppose medical research? Do they reject 
scientific  discoveries that affect our lives? No. Not at all. Are there no 
evangelical or  ultra-orthodox Jewish doctors? Of course there are, and 
apparently 
they are very  comfortable learning and practicing science. 
Compared to the many irrational beliefs of secular, leftist intellectuals 
--  good and evil exist even though there is no God; male and female are  
interchangeable; international institutions are the hope of mankind --  
evangelical irrational beliefs are utterly benign. 
And in regards to same-sex marriage, why is the normative Christian and  
Jewish belief that marriage should be between a man and a woman anti-science 
and  anti-intellectual? What we have here is the usual left-wing tactic of 
smearing  opponents. If you disagree with race-based affirmative action, you 
are a racist.  If you disagree with the ever-expanding welfare state, you 
lack compassion. If  you disagree with redefining marriage in the most radical 
way ever attempted in  history, you are a hater. 
No wonder the left developed the foolish and destructive self-esteem 
movement  -- no one has anywhere near the self-esteem leftists have. They are 
certain that  they are better human beings in every way than those who have the 
temerity to  oppose them. 
This Jew will take the evangelicals' values and the evangelicals' America  
over those of left-wing intellectuals' any day of the year. If evangelicals 
come  with some views I find irrational, that's a tiny price to pay compared 
to the  price humanity has paid for the left's consistently broken moral 
compass -- when  it comes to America; Communism and Islamism; superiority of 
peace studies over  waging war against evil; America's role in the world; 
_Israel_ 
(http://realclearworld.com/topic/around_the_world/israel/?utm_source=rcw&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=rcwautolink)
 
;  the welfare state; Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and all the other left-wing 
 dictators whom the left-wing has celebrated; the belief that men and women 
are  basically the same; the greater worth of any animal than of the unborn 
human;  and nearly every other major moral issue. 
If these professors typify the views of Eastern Nazarene, which is 
officially  listed as a Christian university, it is reason for despair. Once 
left-wing  values enter the evangelical bloodstream, there is almost no hope 
for  
America. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to