Your prediction sounds about right.
 
Billy
 
 
--------------------------
 
 
11/19/2011 6:27:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected]  writes:

This is a blockbuster poll result.  This result and Ernie's  encouragement 
have caused me to reconsider my life strategy.  
 
I predict New Gingrich will last in the top tier for eleven days.
 
The prediction is also noteworthy:
 
_http://youtu.be/9K2ktRZ4T48_ (http://youtu.be/9K2ktRZ4T48) 
 
Kevin

 
New poll shows Romney now in dead heat with Gingrich in …
 
posted at 11:45 am on November 18, 2011 by Ed Morrissey


 
Yes, I think it’s safe to say that the Newt Gingrich bubble has _gotten 
serious_ 
(http://nhjournal.com/2011/11/18/poll-romney-gingrich-in-statistical-dead-heat-in-n-h/)
 .  _A new poll from Magellan Strategies_ 
(http://www.scribd.com/doc/73114432/New-Hampshire-2012-GOP-Presidential-Primary-Survey-Topline
-Results-111711)  in New  Hampshire — Mitt Romney’s long-held redoubt — 
shows Gingrich now in a  virtual dead heat with the presumed Republican 
frontrunner.  As NH  Journal reports, the internals look even better for 
Gingrich 
than the  top-line numbers: 
The latest NH Journal poll of likely Republican primary voters  conducted 
by Magellan Strategies shows Romney and Gingrich in a  statistical dead heat 
for the January 10th primary. If the election were  held today, Romney would 
earn 29% of the vote and Gingrich would earn 27%.  Texas Congressman Ron 
Paul continues to show resolve by earning 16%.  Herman Cain gets 10%. No other 
candidate is in double digits. 
This is the first time any of NH Journal’s polls have shown anyone  
candidate even close to Romney. It also shows tremendous movement for  Gingrich 
since _NH  Journal’s October survey_ 
(http://nhjournal.com/2011/10/14/poll-romney-rocking-cain-creeping-gingrich-gaining/)
 , in which Gingrich was in third 
place, but at  only 10% versus Romney’s 41%. … 
A close look at the data shows Gingrich is actually leading Romney  among 
certain important subgroups of the electorate. Among self-identified  
conservative voters, Gingrich beats Romney 34%-27%. Among self-identified  tea 
party voters, he leads Romney 38%-21%. 
However, Romney has a wide lead over Gingrich among Undeclared voters,  who 
give the former Massachusetts Governor 29% over Paul’s 19% and  Gingrich’s 
18%. There is also a significant gender gap for both Romney and  Gingrich. 
Romney beats Gingrich 33%-22% among women while Gingrich defeats  Romney 
32%-24% among men.
If this is not an outlier (Magellan is a fairly reliable pollster), then  
this is a blockbuster result.  Romney doesn’t need to win Iowa to  garner the 
nomination; a strong second-place finish there could propel him  quickly to 
the ticket — but only if he wins New Hampshire.  A  loss in this state 
would be a body blow, especially if Gingrich wins Iowa  ahead of New Hampshire 
and then takes aim at South Carolina and  Florida.  Even a win in Michigan 
and Nevada might not slow down  Gingrich, and Romney could be looking at a 
second consecutive CPAC  concession in his presidential-campaign career if he 
loses either or both of  those. 
There are, however, a couple of big caveats.  No one has  really tested 
Gingrich in this campaign, mainly because no one has needed to  go on the 
attack against someone who hasn’t been a front-runner.   Romney will have no 
choice now but to open fire on the man who has praised  him in the debates, and 
probably with much more gusto than he did against  Rick Perry, who was never 
a threat to Romney in New Hampshire. 
Another point to keep in mind is that Gingrich himself has only begun to  
perform as a front-runner, and he comes to this polling result with a  huge 
disadvantage in organization.  Last night, _Gingrich welcomed back the staff 
who walked out on him in  June_ 
(http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/gingrich-staffers-who-quit-in-june-return-to-campaign/)
 , which might 
accelerate the organizational build-up he needs to  really compete in Iowa and 
New Hampshire: 
For Newt Gingrich, the latest twist on “what goes around, comes around”  
has an unusual personal dimension. On top of his surge in polls and  
fund-raising, Mr. Gingrich has rehired two of the Iowa staff members who  quit 
during a mass exodus from his campaign in June. … 
Thanks to his solid performances in national debates, he has gradually  
gained supporters and donors, emerging at the top of some recent polls and  
flush with enough money to hire a new staff. 
Last week he opened offices in New Hampshire and South Carolina. And on  
Thursday the campaign announced it had rehired Craig Schoenfeld, who had  been 
state director in Iowa before the departures, and Katie Koberg, who  had 
been deputy director. The hirings were first reported by The Des  Moines 
Register.
Still, the polling results offer a bad omen for Romney, who had been  
quietly building a narrative of inevitability for his nomination.  If  he 
becomes 
vulnerable in the one state he had thought was locked into his  camp, then 
the state might be open to nearly any one of the candidates who  can manage 
to boost their polling.  If Gingrich can build his  organization quickly and 
manage to withstand the scrutiny of being the  front-runner, he could push 
Romney out of the nomination by early January …  but those are mighty big 
ifs, too.
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to