TRUMP
AND PEROT- TYPICAL GAME PLANS?
This past weekend Donald Trump appeared to once again
throw his hat into the upcoming Presidential race. In, out,
maybe, maybe not. Is this a continuous effort to keep his name
and his ego in the spotlight?
No, nothing quite so vapid.
On FOX news 'The Donald' informed the viewers that his wife
wants him to continue to seek the office of the Presidency,
"If they don't approve of the Republican Nomination". But is
it not too late for anyone to join the fracas in the
Republican Party? Yes, But Mr. Trump floated this little
ditty......
He could run as an Independent. Oh, how
very fortunate for America, and oh yes, and for Obama.
As everyone knows, Trump has always declared his
'Republicanism' in one breath, while trashing those in the his
party, with the next. His attacks on George Bush were
relentless, even before Bush's fall to leftist pressures
relating to Tarp and other less than Conservative issues.
Which brings us to the elder Bush and how he lost to Bill
Clinton.
With 19% of the electorate casting votes for
"Independent" Perot, the conservative vote was split and
thereby insured a Clinton victory. The following election,
Perot ran again, completing the rupture of the Republican
voting block.
This is of course, old news, right? Well yes, but its also a
tried and true political tactic.
Early on in Obama's term, Trump had made some very
favorable comments about him. Obama's agenda and ideology
were very plain for anyone to see and predict. Did the
brilliant Trump need to actually see and feel the effects
before his views of Obama would be changed? Not likely. So
what has changed?
Except for the predictability of an Obama caused economic
collapse, the only thing that has taken on an ominous reality,
for the Democrats at least, is Obama has an almost zero
chance of being re-elected.
Except.......
Several months ago, Trump, floating the Birth Certificate
problems of Obama, in an effort to get National news media
attention and establishing himself as a possible candidate,
has since been quiet on the issue following the release of
Obama's long form birth certificate. Which, for those that
may just listen to the main stream media, has unequivocally
been proven to be a forgery.
If it was so important for Trump to get proof of Obama's
birth location, several months ago, why is he not calling for
an investigation of the documents that clearly have raised
more questions than they have answered?
If someone wanted to insure an Obama victory in 2012,
despite the overwhelming majority of voters wanting him out,
what better way to do that, combined with the normal liberal
voter fraud, than to insert
Mr. Perot Trump into the
mix?
But you might say, Trump talks constantly about how bad Obama
is as president. Why would he do that if he wanted him
re-elected? The answer of course is, how else would he split
the Conservative vote? Would any Obama lefty, not vote for
him because of anything Trump says? Not a chance. However,
how many ideologues on the conservative side would cast a vote
for an Independent, even with the understanding that it would
insure an Obama victory?
The answer is about 19%.
The reason that this scenario makes sense sits mostly on what
issues Trump has chosen to highlight on his latest venture
into the realm of politics:
Has he talked about Obama's ineligibility to be
President based on our Constitution?
Has he questioned his use of an illegal Social Security
Number?
Has he remarked about the so very obvious forgery of Obama's
birth certificate?
No! None of those things. Because anyone of them, if
they are ever brought to light and seriously addressed, would
sink Obama's reelection as his name would be removed from many
ballots across the Nation.
So Trump speaks of issues that will split the conservative
vote if he runs as an Independent, and will keep the left in
Obama's corner and not threaten the his reelection.
It is not my concerted belief that any of this is absolutely
Trump's agenda, but while not being probable, certainly is
possible.
in that light, its very important that Conservatives watch
where they set their allegiances.
