"Remember, to a liberal, anyone who makes money in an endeavor frowned upon by 
liberals is 'greedy' and any person who expressMy grandfather used to say "that 
which comes from the part that comes over the fence last.

Kevin
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David R. Block 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 8:27 PM
  Subject: Re: <no links> Re: [RC] The Great Economic Mess and How We Got There


  "Bovine excrement detector" 
  "Tool for measuring the discharge from the North end of a South bound cow" 
  "Bevo excrement detector" (Texas only) 

  Come on, work with me here....

  David


  "Remember, to a liberal, anyone who makes money in an endeavor frowned upon 
by liberals is 'greedy' and any person who expresses an idea contrary to basic 
liberal dogma is preaching 'hate.'  How shallow these people are."-Neal Boortz 




  On 11/23/2011 6:04 PM, [email protected] wrote: 
    Ernie :
    I like the idea. Something we might work on ?
    Maybe should be added to RC principles, viz, 
    "Radical Centrism :  Politics based on the Results of Crap Detection "

    Must be a better way to say it, but as a general approach.

    Billy

    -----------------------------------------------------


    11/23/2011 3:27:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] 
writes:
      Hi Billy,

      On Nov 23, 2011, at 2:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
      > Fact is, though, there is no substitute for actually knowing a field / 
discipline.
      > This means that none of us can be competent in more than , say,  4 or 5 
areas.
      > Maybe a few more if you really work at it, but there are limits

      The really tantalizing question is whether there is some sort of 
meta-discipline  -- e.g., "BS detector" -- that it *is* possible to master. 
That is, we can't possibly know everything, but we can learn to know when 
somebody lacks credibility. Sort of like Napier's Law for words, not just 
numbers.

      I actually think it is possible to come up with a good heuristic, in that 
it could at least distinguish sloppy reasoning from solid thinking.  Alas, if 
the heuristic were ever published and widely-adopted, then the cheaters would 
learn how to hack it.  So if I come up with such a meta-discipline, I'd have to 
use it rather than talk about it...

      E

      -- 
      Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
      Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
      Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

    -- 
    Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
    Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
    Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org


  -- 
  Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
  Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
  Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to