Made me think differently about Congress...

There's a better way to gauge Congress - southbendtribune.com
http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/sbt-theres-a-better-way-to-gauge-congress-20120111,0,6470433.story

There’s a better way to gauge Congress

6:55 a.m. EST, January 11, 2012

I suspect that most members of Congress will want to forget the year that just 
ended. The institution that symbolizes our democracy finished 2011 plumbing 
depths of unpopularity it has never experienced before. Its low approval 
ratings set records — suggesting, as Gallup put it, “that 2011 will be 
remembered as the year in which the American public lost much of any remaining 
faith in the men and women they elect and send off to Washington to represent 
them.” The poor jobs picture, the lurching from one brink-of-disaster deadline 
to the next, the polarization that keeps the parties from working together, the 
widespread sense that Congress is so dysfunctional it cannot meet the nation’s 
challenges — all play a role. These are all valid ways of judging Congress, but 
they are not the only way. Every year, the Center on Congress at Indiana 
University polls a group of congressional scholars on how they think the 
institution is doing, and one of the challenges we face is devising a set of 
questions that meaningfully probe Congress’s performance. It’s not as easy as 
you’d think. The historic mission of the Congress has been to maintain freedom, 
a goal whose achievement is impossible to measure in a year’s — or even a few 
years’ — time. Moreover, a well-functioning Congress has to operate on many 
fronts: as the legislative body representing a diverse nation, as a 
counter-balance to the president, as an overseer of the federal bureaucracy, as 
a forger of policy, as two separate institutions (Senate and House) that have 
to find common ground and uphold processes that allow each one to perform 
effectively. The first of Congress’ responsibilities is to protect its 
constitutional role as a strong, coequal branch of government. It must stand 
apart from and serve as a check upon the excesses of presidential power. So how 
well is it safeguarding its powers from presidential encroachment? Does it live 
up to its proper role in determining the federal budget? How’s it doing at 
oversight of the executive branch? Is it generating meaningful, politically 
sustainable policy alternatives or just sitting back and letting the White 
House take all the political risks? Does it set the national agenda, or act 
timidly? And does it safeguard the war powers assigned it by the Constitution? 
Its second great role is to represent the American people. This means making 
sure that all voices get a fair hearing and that diverse viewpoints play a part 
in crafting initiatives — all while safeguarding institutional practices that 
allow legislation to move forward in a timely manner. Just as important, does 
Congress spend its time on key issues facing the country, or instead let itself 
get diverted by partisan concerns or by issues of importance only to 
well-heeled special interests? Third, in a country as politically and 
demographically varied as ours, negotiation and compromise are key to crafting 
legislation that can enjoy broad political support. To gauge whether Congress 
is following sound process, you would want to know several things. Are its 
leaders capable of working hard to forge a consensus? If they can’t, do 
conflicts over legislation represent substantive differences or mere political 
game-playing? Does it balance careful deliberation with making decisions? Does 
it protect the rights of the minority and allow all points to be heard? Is it 
transparent — so that its members can be held accountable for their actions? 
Fourth, does Congress set sufficiently high standards for its individual 
members? That means keeping excessive partisanship in check and making sure its 
members are behaving ethically. And finally, how strong is the connection of 
members of Congress to their constituents back home? Do they understand their 
constituents and try to represent them in Washington? Do they make themselves 
accessible in a variety of settings and speak out for their communities at 
times of need? Do they listen well and are they closely attuned to the core 
needs and interests of the people they represent? All of these questions add up 
to how well Congress represents the interests of the American people and, as 
always, it does better on some than on others. Despite its obvious troubles, 
the picture is not entirely bleak. And I can’t help but believe that the more 
well-rounded our understanding of where Congress falls short and where it 
performs well, the better we can hold it to account.
Lee Hamilton is director of the Center on Congress at Indiana University. He 
was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from the Hoosier state for 34 
years.

Copyright © 2012, South Bend Tribune

sbt-theres-a-better-way-to-gauge-congress-20120111

(via Instapaper)



Sent from my iPhone

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to