Title: "Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech
We have EPA overreach and Globull Warming fraud all around and complaining about it is the distraction???

So we let the EPA strangle the energy supply and kill jobs because government is so saintly???

I cannot believe that I'm reading this.

David

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."—Neal Boortz

 


On 3/25/2012 12:21 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
Hi DRB,

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 24, 2012, at 21:46, "David R. Block" <[email protected]> wrote:

I thought that we were in MORE opposition to the current Presidential office holder. This seems to be a distraction. 
While Billy's crusade may be overblown, he has a legitimate point. The idolization of the free market and demonization of the government is largely what is making the GOP lose the masses. Yes, we can't blame all that on Rand and the libertarians, but they are the ideological core of those messages. 

In short: they are the distraction. 

E


--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to