3/25/2012 7:48:25 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

"So the government has been  immunized from criticism."
 
 
Where on Earth do you get this idea   ?   The point of Radical Centrism
is that BOTH government and business  deserve their fair share of criticism.
However, because either Ernie or myself  criticize government at any given 
time
does NOT mean that all of a sudden we  have become Libertarians BECAUSE
in due course we will criticize the  private sector for something else.
 
NEITHER government nor business is  immune from criticism.
Both deserve it, and both should receive  it.
 
This is really, really basic to  RC.
 
The impression that is hard to shake is  that outside of this group close to
all of your "listening" is to  Libertarian or Right wing views and, none at 
all
from the Left or "other." The result is  that you interpret what I say,
or Ernie says, as if, when either of us  criticize gvt we surely have
seen the Libertarian light, which is  false, or that, when  we criticize
business, why, surely, we have gone over  to the dark side
and have made peace with the Left, which  is equally false.
 
I have a friend who is a hard core  Democrat.  Exact same problem
with him except in reverse image. He  just doesn't get the point of RC,
that it is independent and centrist and  approximately as unhappy
with Democrats as with  Republicans.  For him, any deviation from
the Left means that you are a Right-wing  zealot or worse.
The result is that we never talk  politics any more, 
just other common  interests.
 
Sure, I am not at all favorably disposed  to BHO and hope for his defeat
this November.  But the GOP is  anything but political salvation
and there is almost as much to be  negatively disposed about
in the Republican Party as the  Democrats.
 
RC is a philosophy for political  Independents, essentially.
It is not an alternative version of the  Republican Party.
just as it is not of the Democratic  Party either.
 
Billy
 
 
--------------------------------------
 
 
 
By libertarians, or by the media  parroting an ultra-libertarian line and 
crediting it to the Republicans and  Libertarians? 

I doubt that a large number of people are out there  combing through Reason 
Magazine or the Cato Institute publications for this to  become the message 
from libertarian sources. I mean REALLY?

The Left  Stream Media is for Barack Obama, just like they were in 
2008-hook, line, and  sinker, and they may have even converted to boat to a 
submarine as they were  so fat in the tank then and even more-so now if that it 
possible.  

David




  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by 
definition,  needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 3/25/2012 8:32 PM,  Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:  
Hi David,

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 25, 2012, at 16:34, "David R. Block" <[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote:



We have EPA overreach and Globull  Warming fraud all around and complaining 
about it is the distraction???  

So we let the EPA strangle the energy supply and kill jobs because  
government is so saintly??? 

I cannot believe that I'm reading  this. 




Yes. There are LOTS of valid reasons and positions to criticize the  
government and excessive regulation. 


The problem is that the GOP messaging around that has been hijacked by  the 
simplistic:
- market = good
- government = bad
mantra of libertarians


Thus, any legitimate critique of the government is interpreted by the  Left 
as a call for Social Darwinism. Giving them a perfect excuse to defend  
their failed experiment in social engineering.


In a wiser GOP, somebody (Huntsman?) would argue coherently for a lean,  
smaller, modest, yet effective government that also appealed to moderate  
voters. But the Tea Party/Liberaltarian rhetoric appears to have scared off  
such candidates, and appears on track to snatch defeat from the jaws of  
victory. 


Which means we will get four more  years of exactly the stuff you  complain 
about. 


I call that a costly distraction. 


E





David  

  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by  
definition, needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 3/25/2012 12:21  AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:  
Hi DRB,



Sent from my iPhone



On Mar 24, 2012, at 21:46, "David R. Block" <[email protected]>_ 
(mailto:[email protected])  wrote:




I thought that we were in MORE opposition to the current Presidential 
office holder. This seems to be a distraction. 


While Billy's crusade may be overblown, he has a legitimate point. The 
idolization of the free market and demonization of the government is largely 
what is making the GOP lose the masses. Yes, we can't blame all that on Rand 
and the libertarians, but they are the ideological core of those messages. 



In short: they are the distraction. 



E






-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://RadicalCentrism.org) 




-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to