This is ludicrous. In 2008 Ann Coulter was apoplectic about the prospect of 
 a
McCain candidacy on the Republican ticket   --on the grounds  that he
was not a true conservative.  Now   --and granted that he is  THE choice
now left standing in the GOP and is better him than the alternative--   
Coulter
is a Romney supporter and is blasting away at conservatives like Sarah  
Palin.
As for Romney's conservative bona fides, well,there don't seem to  be any.
Not to mention Coulter's abandonment of conservative positions.  Coulter is 
no
longer ( as if she ever really was ) a critic of homosexuality and  
homosexual
political demands, which have become OK with her.
 
Michelle Malkin has noticed this turn of events.
 
Billy
 
=================================================
 
 
Ann Coulter’s “novelty candidate” swipe at Sarah Palin
     
(http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://michellemalkin.com/2012/04/02/ann-coulters-novelty-candidate-swipe-at-sarah-palin/&t=Ann
 Coulter)  
By Michelle  Malkin  •  April 2, 2012

 
 
 
Mitt Romney supporter Ann Coulter appeared on the ABC News Sunday show, “
This  Week,” hosted by former Clintonite George Stephanopoulos. Asked about 
Romney’s  potential vice presidential picks, she said this (while seated at a 
table with  former green jobs czar Van Jones, who served under the Biggest 
Novelty Candidate  of Them All, Barack Obama): 
Ann Coulter:  
“_You  can’t have a novelty candidate, I think. That would ring too much 
like Sarah  Palin._ 
(http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/heard-week/story?id=16045845#.T3nMmL-XQig)  I 
agree with George Will that it be good to have little 
tea party  excitement, and the odds-on favorite, I mean, certainly the 
betting is on  Marco Rubio, I think that would be a mistake.” But Coulter, who 
is 
a firm Mitt  Romney supporter, said the GOP frontrunner needs a running mate 
who is tried  and tested, she suggested Romney pick someone like New Jersey 
Gov. Chris  Christie or Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.”He’s been 
tested, he’s  steady, he’s not frightening. He could certainly step into the 
job” Coulter  said of Kyl.
Unbelievably, Coulter is under the continued delusion that Sarah Palin was  
the problem with the 2008 ticket and not McCain. Later in the show, when 
Van  Jones floated former Bush Secretary of State Condoleezza Rices name for 
VP,  Coulter snorted again: “Too much like Palin.” 
Say what? 
Like her love object Chris Christie, Coulter has been taking many open 
shots  at Palin lately. Florida’s great _Shark  Tank_ 
(http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://shark-tank.net
/2012/03/13/26803/&ei=xc15T8jsHszmggeEwKD5Dg&usg=AFQjCNFf80NHTHTChELns1n5jb3
Cvx2VJw&sig2=nsT0duklXVrtlM8ykOLVCw)  blog and the _Daily  Caller_ 
(http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/14/coulter-on-palin-brokered-convention-gop-has-a-pro
blem-with-con-men-and-charlatans/)  noted a few weeks ago that Coulter took 
nasty swipes at Palin at a  Lincoln Day Dinner event: 
Coulter, who was asked about the prospects of a brokered Republican  
convention, hinted — as she has done in the past – that former Alaska Gov.  
Sarah 
Palin is promoting the idea because she would like to be considered for  
the GOP nomination should a brokered convention occur. Coulter warned that  
selecting a candidate that way would void the vetting process that has weeded  
out inferior candidates. 
“One of the ones promoting that [a brokered convention] is Sarah Palin, who 
 has suggested herself as the choice,” Coulter said. “I think as long as it
’s  between us girls — I’ve been observing something about her. I don’t 
think it’s  likely to happen. I don’t know what these people are cheering 
for. As I wrote  in a column a few weeks back, who is this dream candidate we’
re hoping to get  from the convention, because Rick Perry used to be the 
dream candidate. Can we  see them in a debate first?” 
…Coulter said that might be a weakness in the Republican Party as a whole —
  that certain individuals become celebrities and are allowed to profit off 
that  status and yet still interfere in GOP politics, which Democrats have 
been able  to avoid. 
“And just a more corporate problem is I think our party and particularly  
our movement, the conservative movement, does have more of a problem with con 
 men and charlatans than the Democratic Party,” she said. “I mean, the  
incentives seem to be set up to allow people — as long as you have a band of a 
 few million fanatical followers, you can make money. The Democrats have  
managed to figure out how not to do that.” 
…“The one pledge I support and I think I’m going to draft it up is for all 
 Republican nominees for president — I want them to sign a pledge saying, ‘
If I  lose the nomination I pledge I will not take a gig with Fox News or 
write a  book.’” 
Looks like someone’s not happy about competition encroaching on her market, 
 eh? 
Here’s my translation of Coulter-speak:  
“Novelty candidate” is her code for a GOP candidate with widespread,  
grass-roots conservative support who doesn’t make large portions of the  
rank-and-file Right queasy with doubt.  
That was who Sarah Palin represented on the liberal Republican John McCain  
ticket.  
“Novelty candidate” means an outside-the-Beltway, 
outside-the-establishment  public servant who speaks from the heart, lives 
political and personal 
life on  her own terms, and embodies all that _Coulter’s  best Hollywood 
friends like misogynist Bill Maher_ 
(http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2012/03/21/ann-coulter-defends-not-only-robert-deniro-but-even-bill-maher-video/)
  
hate. 
Sometimes, the _war  on conservative women_ 
(http://michellemalkin.com/2012/03/07/the-war-on-conservative-women/)  isn’t 
just being waged by the Left. 
This is a form of political fragging. Shame. 
*** 
Wasn’t long ago when Coulter was _singing a far different tune about  Gov. 
Palin_ (http://www.firefromtheheartland.com/) .  

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to