I heard about that. But what in heck possessed her to accept their  
invitation ?
 
This kind of reminds me of Ralph Reed's coming around to the  establishment
point of view. My impression is that he was invited to join the Old Boys  
Club.
Admission was easy, just compromise away his most conservative  positions.
Then he becomes one of them,  with access to the East Coast elite  lifestyle
and social circles. My interpretation of what happened.
 
But Coulter could have had all of that for the asking, and for years
she wasn't interested. Now she is.
 
Sickening to think about.  
 
Guess she got tired of missing out on elite cocktail parties.
 
Billy
 
 
============================================
 
4/4/2012 10:08:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

She spoke at a gay GOP rally and decided that they  weren't bad folks. Been 
downhill since then. 

David

  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by 
definition,  needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 4/4/2012 11:25 PM,  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
 
Any idea what is behind Coulter's "opening to the Left" ?
She is not the person I remember from, say, 2005, or even  2007.
Different person even if she still shows up among conservatives
now and then.  But it is what she now says, which at most  is
half conservative. Somewhere along there way she has
--at least partly--  become the "enemy" she once despised.
 
So it seems to me.
 
Billy
 
------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
4/4/2012 9:02:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected])   writes:

VERY disappointed with AC.  

David 

  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by  
definition, needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 4/4/2012 9:14  AM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   wrote:  
This is ludicrous. In 2008 Ann Coulter was apoplectic about the  prospect 
of a
McCain candidacy on the Republican ticket   --on the  grounds that he
was not a true conservative.  Now   --and granted  that he is THE choice
now left standing in the GOP and is better him than the  alternative--  
Coulter
is a Romney supporter and is blasting away at conservatives like  Sarah 
Palin.
As for Romney's conservative bona fides, well,there don't  seem to be any.
Not to mention Coulter's abandonment of conservative  positions. Coulter is 
no
longer ( as if she ever really was ) a critic of homosexuality and  
homosexual
political demands, which have become OK with her.
 
Michelle Malkin has noticed this turn of events.
 
Billy
 
=================================================
 
 
Ann Coulter’s “novelty candidate” swipe at Sarah Palin
     
(http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://michellemalkin.com/2012/04/02/ann-coulters-novelty-candidate-swipe-at-sarah-palin/&t=Ann+Coulter?s+?no
velty+candidate?+swipe+at+Sarah+Palin)  

By Michelle  Malkin  •  April 2, 2012

 
 
 
Mitt Romney supporter Ann Coulter appeared on the ABC News Sunday  show, “
This Week,” hosted by former Clintonite George Stephanopoulos.  Asked about 
Romney’s potential vice presidential picks, she said this  (while seated at a 
table with former green jobs czar Van Jones, who  served under the Biggest 
Novelty Candidate of Them All, Barack  Obama): 
Ann Coulter:  
“_You can’t have a novelty candidate, I think.  That would ring too much 
like Sarah Palin._ 
(http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/heard-week/story?id=16045845#.T3nMmL-XQig)  I 
agree with George  Will that it be good to have little 
tea party excitement, and the  odds-on favorite, I mean, certainly the 
betting is on Marco Rubio, I  think that would be a mistake.” But Coulter, who 
is 
a firm Mitt Romney  supporter, said the GOP frontrunner needs a running mate 
who is tried  and tested, she suggested Romney pick someone like New Jersey 
Gov.  Chris Christie or Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.”He’s been  
tested, he’s steady, he’s not frightening. He could certainly step  into the 
job” Coulter said of Kyl.
Unbelievably, Coulter is under the continued delusion that Sarah  Palin was 
the problem with the 2008 ticket and not McCain. Later in the  show, when 
Van Jones floated former Bush Secretary of State Condoleezza  Rices name for 
VP, Coulter snorted again: “Too much like Palin.” 
Say what? 
Like her love object Chris Christie, Coulter has been taking many  open 
shots at Palin lately. Florida’s great _Shark Tank_ (http://www.goo
gle.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&url=http://shark-tank.net/
2012/03/13/26803/&ei=xc15T8jsHszmggeEwKD5Dg&usg=AFQjCNFf80NHTHTChELns1n5jb3C
vx2VJw&sig2=nsT0duklXVrtlM8ykOLVCw)  blog and the _Daily Caller_ 
(http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/14/coulter-on-palin-brokered-convention-gop-has-a-probl
em-with-con-men-and-charlatans/)  noted a few weeks ago that  Coulter took 
nasty swipes at Palin at a Lincoln Day Dinner event: 
Coulter, who was asked about the prospects of a brokered Republican  
convention, hinted — as she has done in the past – that former Alaska  Gov. 
Sarah 
Palin is promoting the idea because she would like to be  considered for 
the GOP nomination should a brokered convention occur.  Coulter warned that 
selecting a candidate that way would void the  vetting process that has weeded 
out inferior candidates. 
“One of the ones promoting that [a brokered convention] is Sarah  Palin, 
who has suggested herself as the choice,” Coulter said. “I  think as long as 
it’s between us girls — I’ve been observing something  about her. I don’t 
think it’s likely to happen. I don’t know what  these people are cheering 
for. As I wrote in a column a few weeks  back, who is this dream candidate we’
re hoping to get from the  convention, because Rick Perry used to be the 
dream candidate. Can we  see them in a debate first?” 
…Coulter said that might be a weakness in the Republican Party as a  whole —
 that certain individuals become celebrities and are allowed to  profit off 
that status and yet still interfere in GOP politics, which  Democrats have 
been able to avoid. 
“And just a more corporate problem is I think our party and  particularly 
our movement, the conservative movement, does have more  of a problem with 
con men and charlatans than the Democratic Party,”  she said. “I mean, the 
incentives seem to be set up to allow people —  as long as you have a band of 
a few million fanatical followers, you  can make money. The Democrats have 
managed to figure out how not to do  that.” 
…“The one pledge I support and I think I’m going to draft it up is  for 
all Republican nominees for president — I want them to sign a  pledge saying, ‘
If I lose the nomination I pledge I will not take a  gig with Fox News or 
write a book.’” 
Looks like someone’s not happy about competition encroaching on her  
market, eh? 
Here’s my translation of Coulter-speak:  
“Novelty candidate” is her code for a GOP candidate with widespread,  
grass-roots conservative support who doesn’t make large portions of the  
rank-and-file Right queasy with doubt.  
That was who Sarah Palin represented on the liberal Republican John  McCain 
ticket.  
“Novelty candidate” means an outside-the-Beltway,  
outside-the-establishment public servant who speaks from the heart,  lives 
political and personal 
life on her own terms, and embodies all  that _Coulter’s best Hollywood 
friends like misogynist  Bill Maher_ 
(http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2012/03/21/ann-coulter-defends-not-only-robert-deniro-but-even-bill-maher-video/)
  
hate. 
Sometimes, the _war on conservative women_ 
(http://michellemalkin.com/2012/03/07/the-war-on-conservative-women/)  isn’t 
just being  waged by the Left. 
This is a form of political fragging. Shame. 
*** 
Wasn’t long ago when Coulter was _singing a far different tune about Gov.  
Palin_ (http://www.firefromtheheartland.com/) .  









-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to