Billy

In situations like this in the past I have voted Libertarian.  Why is the
Constitution Party better?

Chris 

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RC] Spiritual Suicide

 

If, God forbid, Romney is down by 7 or 8 % just prior to the election,

I might vote Constitution Party.  If it was close then I'd cast my vote

for Mitt because it would count. But if he is likely to lose

then I may as well help out the Constitution people.

 

Obviously there are a number of disagreements I have with

the Constitution Party, but it would be a meaningful 

protest vote.

 

My approach, for what it is worth.  But I don't have any serious objection

to voting for a Mormon. Romney is not my first choice but it is damned rare
when

anything like my first choice is remotely in the cards.

 

Billy

 

 

 

 

4/4/2012 9:57:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]
writes:

Well, my brother in law will not vote for a Mormon. He won't vote for Obama
either, so I don't know what he is going to do. 

David

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by
definition, needs no protection."-Neal Boortz

 


On 4/4/2012 2:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: 

 

 

 

 

Poll: Evangelicals May Double Their Support for Obama in 2012 Election

 

By Napp Nazworth <http://www.christianpost.com/author/napp-nazworth/>  ,
Christian Post Reporter

April 4, 2012|2:40 pm


In the 2012 presidential election, President
<http://www.christianpost.com/topics/barack-obama/> Barack Obama could
double the amount of support he got from
<http://www.christianpost.com/topics/evangelicals/> evangelicals in the 2008
election, according to Barna Group, a Christian polling organization.


In 2008, Obama received the support of about 11 percent of evangelicals,
according to Barna Group. In a March 14-21 Barna Group poll of 647 likely
voters, twice as many evangelicals, 22 percent, said they were prepared to
vote for Obama.

Barna categorizes "evangelical" more narrowly than most other polling
organizations. Many polls simply include self-identifiers - those who say,
when asked, that they are evangelical or born-again.

 

Under Barna's classification, an evangelical is one who says they have made
a personal commitment to Jesus Christ and that commitment remains important
to them, and shares seven beliefs common among evangelicals, such as the
existence of Satan and that eternal salvation comes through grace, not
works. Using this measure of evangelical, Barna found that evangelicals
comprise seven percent of the population and 10 percent of likely voters.

 

Though Obama appears to be gaining the support of evangelicals, the
enthusiasm levels of those supporters remain low. Only three to five percent
of evangelicals said they would "definitely" vote for him, while 53-58
percent of evangelicals said they would "definitely" support the Republican
challenger. 

Among religious skeptics, defined as atheists and agnostics, Obama receives
strong support. Against Mitt Romney, the likely Republican nominee, Obama
would likely receive the support of about 70 percent of this group if the
election were held now. Religious skeptics would also comprise 11 percent of
the 

 

electorate, about the same as evangelicals. 

Barna Group cautions, though, about reading too much into the results. The
election is not until November and the Republican nominee has not been
chosen.

"Without the Republican candidate having been selected yet, and with three
months of the major party candidates bashing each other after the upcoming
party conventions, much could change before November 6. However, a few early
indicators were flagged as factors to watch during the coming months," Barna
Group writes.

The poll's margin of error is plus or minus four percentage points.

Christian author George Barna founded Barna Group and is currently working
with the Newt Gingrich campaign. He sold his majority share of Barna Group
in 2009 and is no longer involved in its operation.

 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to