You get this effect on the Right also, but it is pronounced on the  Left.
Fox , for example, is really bad at downplaying Republican weaknesses
or simply ignoring selected facts to make the Democrats look bad.
NOT Special Report, which is in a category by itself, but everything  else
that  I have looked at. O'Reilly is also sometimes objective,
but in general.
 
But on the Left a lot  ( really a lot ) is hopelessly one-sided. all  the 
while
as journalists think of themselves as paragons of fairness.
 
Take the Matthew Shepard story.  The MSM was all over that one
like crazy. Meanwhile, an even more horrific story in Arkansas
in which two homosexuals tortured to death a heterosexual boy
was totally ignored. Heck, homosexual vs homosexual violence
is ignored almost 100 % nationally , yet it dwarfs, in comparison
any and all "fag bashing" by orders of magnitude.
 
Then there is the odious double standard of the Left media when it 
comes to matters of Islam and Christian faith, with Christians  routinely
treated as dummies, superstitious, immoral because of comments
someone made, while horrific crimes by Muslims largely are unreported
unless there is mass violence that simply cannot be overlooked, 
like Ft Hood or Mumbai.
 
Similarly with respect to treatment of minorities.  This includes  white
minorities., like Appalachians. Who, despite being in total about
the same population numbers as African Americans, they are not  covered
at all, or only once in a great while. Not so much because of pure  politics
but because they don't fit the narrative of white America the media  prefers
of understands.   After all, how can the media account for a  largely
Baptist population that in many parts of the region votes Democratic  ?
Baptist =  Evil  /   Democratic = Virtuous and  Blessed
It doesn't compute.
 
In so many words,media bias is blatant but unless you are informed
about these kinds of things you never see them.
 
Billy
 
============================================
 
 
 
 
4/13/2012 10:42:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

Well it happened in a relatively small Florida  town. 

Had that been, say, Miami, it probably would have hit the fan  sooner. 

David

  _   
 
"Free  speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by 
definition,  needs no protection."—Neal  Boortz 



On 4/13/2012 11:54 AM,  Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:  
I can read this both ways.  Somebody with a legitimate  grievance figures 
out the right way to gain attention, and from there the  intrinsic appeal of 
the story propels it into the limelight.  


Of course one could read it as the liberal media making hay by  
sensationalizing one-half of the racial story (ignoring the Hispanic  
Zimmerman).  But 
i find it intriguing that it wasn't something the  professional newsmakers 
jumped on immediately.


Food for thought...


E


On Apr 13, 2012, at 7:42 AM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   
wrote:







 




Trayvon Martin story found  the media
 
By _Paul Farhi_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/paul-farhi/2011/03/08/ABO2YCP_page.html) , 
Published: April 12,  2012
The Washington Post 

 
 
<ARTICLE
It began as a routine police-blotter item,  a journalistic afterthought. On 
Feb. 26, the _Orlando Sentinel’s online  edition _ 
(http://www.orlandosentinel.com/) devoted a few dozen words to the fatal 
shooting of an unnamed  
teenager in the nearby town of Sanford. The story also made the late news  
that night on _WOFL, the local Fox  affiliate_ (http://www.myfoxorlando.com/) 
. 
The Sentinel followed a day later with another brief item, this one  noting 
the young victim’s name and age: Trayvon Martin, 17. The paper  said it 
wasn’t identifying the shooter, a man in his 20s, “because he  has not 
been charged.† The early police accounts of the episode made it  seem 
nothing more than “a fight gone bad,† recalled John Cutter, the  Sentinelâ
€™s associate editor.


And then . . . nothing. 
The national media didn’t descend on Sanford. Celebrities didn’t  
tweet about the shooting. The cable pundits didn’t start their debate  about 
guns, race and _Florida’s “Stand Your  Ground† law_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/stand-your-ground-laws-coincide-with-jump-in-justifi
able-homicide-cases/2012/04/07/gIQAS2v51S_story.html) . For more than a 
week, the story teetered near  obscurity, at risk of becoming just another 
tragic but forgotten encounter  on a rainy night in central Florida. 
It’s likely that Martin’s death, which resulted in the arrest and  
indictment Wednesday of confessed shooter George Zimmerman, would never  have 
crowded into the national consciousness had it not been for  Martin’s 
family, its lawyers and an enterprising PR man. 
For the most part, the Martin story found the media, rather than vice  
versa. Outraged by the lack of an arrest, the Martin camp lobbied news  outlets 
to examine what had happened that night in Sanford. Eventually,  the media 
did, and the story moved like a fast-burning fuse, leaping from  traditional 
news sources to the blogosphere and social media. 
A pivotal, if little-known, figure in the Martin story’s development  
was _Ryan Julison_ (http://julisoncom.com/we_are.html) , an Orlando  public 
relations executive who began working with the Martin family at the  behest of 
its attorneys, Benjamin Crump and Natalie Jackson. 
With the story fading, Julison began trying to revive interest in it,  
emphasizing a storyline of an unarmed teenager, a neighborhood watchman  with a 
gun and the lack of an arrest. He got few takers. 
“There just wasn’t a lot of interest in this out of the gate,† he  
said in an interview Thursday. “Oftentimes, it seems like the media  
likes to follow instead of going first. They want to wait and see someone  else 
do the story and then they get in line. But we were at zero. We had  to keep 
going from scratch.† 
Julison, who has worked on other high-profile stories, such as acting  as 
spokesman for _John  Travolta after the death of his son, Jett_ 
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/02/jett-travolta-dies-son-of_n_154877.html)
 , 
finally found two takers:  the Reuters wire service and CBS News. 
Reuters moved a 14-paragraph story on the case March 7. The next  morning, 
_“CBS This Morning†_ (http://www.cbsnews.com/cbsthismorning/)   aired a 
piece by reporter Mark Strassman in which Trayvon’s father,  Tracy, 
expressed his grief over his son’s death and outrage that  Zimmerman was 
still free — two elements that would stoke the coverage  for weeks. 
“It was one of those stories that, when you hear the pitch, you just  
say, ‘Wow, this has to be told,’ † said Chris Licht, executive  
producer of the morning program. From the reaction afterward, he said,  “We 
knew we’d hit on something significant.† 
All at once, the two national media reports  seemed to give the incident 
the attention and credibility Martin’s  family had been seeking. 
That morning, Julison organized a news conference in Jackson’s law  
office in Orlando, featuring Crump and Tracy Martin. The news conference  
generated more local coverage, an Associated Press story and a piece in  the 
Huffington Post. Two days later, on March 10, ABC’s “Good  Morning, 
America† weighed in. 
The fuse, now burning brightly, soon threatened to touch off an  explosion. 
Members of the New Black Panther Party, a fringe group, showed up in  
Sanford that weekend to protest Zimmerman’s release from police custody.  By 
Monday, the Rev. Al Sharpton was talking about the Martin case on his  
syndicated radio program and on his MSNBC show, setting off even more talk  on 
cable. 
On cable talk shows, “hosts on both sides of the political spectrum  
found something that fit their perspectives,† said Tom Rosenstiel,  director 
of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which had studied  the media 
coverage. 
The left seized on the police not charging Zimmerman and on the Martin  
family as symbols of civil rights, he said; the right emphasized alleged  
liberal media bias in reporting the story. According to PEJ’s data,  MSNBC, 
which employs Sharpton, has discussed the Martin case more than CNN  or Fox 
News. 
A key twist in the story, said Julison, was the release on  March 16 of 
tapes of Zimmerman’s 911 emergency calls. The tapes,  which Sanford police 
had resisted releasing, gave news outlets fresh  material to report, and 
added another emotional element to the story. One  recording captured screams 
for help in the background. “It humanized the  situation,† he said. “
You hear people crying. You can’t help but be  moved by it.† 
By this time, the story had spread to social media, with such  celebrities 
as Spike Lee, Russell Simmons and Mia Farrow tweeting their  outrage, and 
LeBron James and his Miami Heat teammates posing for photos  in hoodies — 
the garment worn by Martin at the time of his death. 
The Martin family, in New York for an appearance on “The Today  Show,† 
also agreed to participate in a local rally dubbed “The Million  Hoodie 
March,† which drew enormous media attention. President Obama  finally 
seemed to certify the story’s national significance March 23  when he 
commented, “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.† 
Julison, who worked on the story for no compensation, says he always  
thought his clients’ case had merit, but the outcome wasn’t  guaranteed. “
All of these things worked perfectly,† he said.  “They came out in 
just the right sequence for  us.†



-- 
Centroids: The Center  of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 








-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to