Latest research from Dr. Judith Reisman--
 
Obama's  Department of Health and Human  Services promotes homosexuality,
including its child molestation  forms.
 
 
 
 
     

PULLING  NO PUNCHES

OBAMA'S  HHS 'GROOMING' CHILDREN FOR SEX 
Exclusive: Matt Barber on how advocated techniques mirror  those of 
pedophiles 
Friday, October 26,  2012 
by _MATT BARBER_ (http://www.wnd.com/author/mbarber/)  
Matt  Barber is an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. He serves 
as vice  president of  _Liberty Counsel Action_ 
(http://libertycounselaction.org/) .  
My  strength is as the strength of ten, because my heart is pure. ~ Alfred 
Lord Tennyson 
My dear friend and colleague Dr.  Judith Reisman, a visiting law professor 
at Liberty University School of Law,  recently guest lectured during “Sexual 
Behavior and the Law,” a course I teach.  Dr. Reisman’s lecture was filmed 
by CSPAN and will be airing  soon. 
In past years, Dr. Reisman has  served as scientific consultant to four 
U.S. Department of Justice  administrations, the U.S. Department of Education 
and the U.S. Department of  Health and Human Services (HHS). She is a world 
renowned expert on the  discredited research of bug doctor turned “sexologist,
” Alfred  Kinsey. 
Kinsey, though married to a woman  who took part in his many filmed “
scientific” orgies, was a promiscuous  homosexual and sadomasochist. He managed 
to 
completely upend and twist the  world’s perception of human sexuality in 
the 1950s and ’60s with his world  famous “Kinsey Reports.” 
Even today, most are completely  unaware that during his tenure at Indiana 
University, Kinsey facilitated, with  stopwatches and ledgers, the 
systematic sexual abuse of hundreds, if not  thousands, of children and infants 
– all 
in the name of  science. 
Among other things, Kinsey asserted that children are  “sexual from birth.”
 He further concluded, based upon experiments he directed  and documented 
in his _infamous Table 34,_ (http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/271045/)  that  
adult-child sex is harmless, even beneficial, and described child “orgasm” as  “
culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes  
fainting. …” Many children suffered “excruciating pain,” he observed, “and  
[would] scream if movement [was] continued.” Some “[would] fight away from 
the  [adult] partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although 
they  derive[d] definite pleasure from the situation.” 
Yeah. Sounds like  it. 
It’s little wonder that Dr. Reisman  identifies Kinsey as a “sexual 
psychopath.” These children were as young as 2  months old. 
_The latest book from the foremost  expert on how sexuality has been 
twisted in our day, Dr. Judith Reisman: “Sexual  Sabotage: How One Mad 
Scientist 
Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion  on America”_ 
(http://superstore.wnd.com/books/WND-Books/Sexual-Sabotage-Autographed-Hardcover)
  
Disturbing though that may be, what’s equally disturbing  is that nearly 
all of today’s liberal “comprehensive sex education” curricula –  such as 
that pushed by groups like the National Education Association (NEA), _Planned_ 
(http://search.plannedparenthood.org/Results_home.aspx?params=Kinsey&go.x=0&;
go.y=0)  _Parenthood_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NLUfVWpCKo)  and the 
_Gay Lesbian and Straight Education  Network_ 
(http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2009/12/breaking-obamas-safe-schools-czar-is-promoting-porn-in-the-classr
oom-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/)  (_GLSEN_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iM_5FXkfXIE) ) – is 
derived  entirely 
from the criminally fraudulent research of Alfred  Kinsey. 
But even more troubling is a recent discovery by Dr.  Reisman. She found 
that the Obama administration, which _fully embraces_ 
(http://search.hhs.gov/search?q=Kinsey&btnG=Search&site=HHSgov&entqr=3&ud=1&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-
8&oe=UTF-8&lr=lang_en&client=HHS&proxystylesheet=HHS&ip=208.95.51.178&access
=p&entqrm=0&sort=date:D:S:d1)  the  debunked Kinsey sex-education model, 
has begun pushing a curriculum that, in  many ways, eerily mirrors the “FBI 
Molester Grooming  Paradigm.” 
In short, she found that both  Obama’s HHS and many public sex-education 
programs are doing to children,  constructively, what pedophiles do to “groom”
 them for  sex: 
According to the FBI, child  molesters: 
· Demonstrate sex acts to  children. Offenders commonly use pornography to 
teach or give instructions to  naïve children about how to masturbate, 
perform oral sex and/or engage in sexual  intercourse. 
· Lower the sexual inhibitions  of children. Some children naturally fear 
sexual activities. Some offenders show  pictures of other children engaging 
in sexual activities to overcome these  fears, indicating to their intended 
victims that it is all right to have sex  with an adult because lots of other 
boys and girls do the same  thing. 
· Desensitize children to sex.  Offenders commonly show child pornography 
to their intended victims to expose  them to sexual acts before they are 
naturally curious about such  activities. 
· Sexually arouse children.  Offenders commonly use pornographic images of 
other children to arouse victims,  particularly those in adolescence. 
During her lecture, Dr. Reisman  shocked the 50-plus in attendance by 
illustrating that today’s Kinseyan-based  sex education – as promoted by 
Obama’s 
HHS – does much of what the FBI describes  above. 
Graphic sexual images and explicit  “values neutral” talk of sex and 
sexuality are rampant throughout classrooms  across America, effectively 
desensitizing children and numbing their natural  inhibitions. These 
inhibitions 
help protect children from potential  predators. 
According to Dr. Reisman, “_the brain data_ 
(http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/brain.pdf)  fully  support [the] 
finding” that such “sex education
” literally changes the neural  pathways of a child’s brain. There is 
mounting scientific evidence to support  this hypothesis. 
Whatever its motive, the Obama  administration is guilty of employing these 
grooming techniques on  children. 
Consider, for instance, that _just last year,_ 
(http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hhs-children-are-sexual-beings)  the  
Department of Health and Human 
Services’ “Questions and Answers About Sex”  website provided a _“Quick 
Guide to Healthy  Living”_ 
(http://healthfinder.gov/prevention/ViewTopic.aspx?topicID=77&cnt=1&areaID=1&TopicContentID=492)
  section which, like Kinsey, 
outrageously claimed that  “Children are human beings and therefore sexual 
beings … which is healthy and  normal.” 
Get the implication? And what do  “sexual beings” do? Well, they have sex, 
of course. “It’s hard for parents to  acknowledge this,” admitted the 
page. 
You think? 
The HHS link then suggested that  youth “may also experiment with sexual 
experiences, including those with members  of the same sex, during the years 
they are exploring their own  sexuality.” 
Sound familiar? Remember, the FBI  indicates that pedophiles will “teach or 
give instructions to naïve children  about how to masturbate, perform oral 
sex and/or engage in sexual  intercourse.” 
Who needs pedophiles when we have  today’s “comprehensive sex education”? 
It does all that and  more. 
Speaking of masturbation and other  “sort of ‘sexual’ behavior … young 
kids exhibit,” the HHS is right there to  help. The link says “Parents should 
only be concerned about masturbation if a  child seems preoccupied with it 
to the exclusion of other  activities.” 
Otherwise, masturbate away, I  guess. 
Today’s Kinseyan “comprehensive sex  education” model, embraced by Barack 
Obama and other “progressives,” is nothing  short of educational 
malpractice. It’s child corruption. It’s criminally  reckless. It’s undeniably “
grooming” children for sex. 
During the 2008 presidential  campaign, a then-Sen. Barack Obama spoke 
about teaching “comprehensive sex  education” to kindergartners: “It’s the 
right thing to do … to provide  age-appropriate sex education, science-based 
sex education in schools,” he  said. 
And by “science-based,” of course,  he meant “Kinsey-based.” 
So, what is age appropriate,  science-based sex education? Well, we know 
what Alfred Kinsey thought was “age  appropriate.” We know what he considered 
“science-based.” 
I’d expect such “educational”  grooming tactics and opinions from Alfred 
Kinsey or Jerry Sandusky, but not from  public educators – not from the U.S. 
government. 
And most certainly, not from the  president of the United States.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

<<inline: image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to