(http://www.politico.com/)    
Jindal: End 'dumbed-down  conservatism'
By: Jonathan Martin
November  13, 2012 
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal on  Monday called on Republicans to “stop being 
the stupid party” and make a  concerted effort to reach a broader swath of 
voters with an inclusive  economic message that pre-empts efforts to 
caricature the GOP as the party  of the rich. 
In his first interview since his  party’s electoral thumping last week, 
_Jindal_ (http://www.politico.com/tag/bobbyjindal)  urged Republicans to both 
reject  anti-intellectualism and embrace a populist-tinged reform approach 
that he  said would mitigate what exit polls show was one of President Barack  
Obama’s most effective lines of attack against Mitt Romney. 
“We’ve got to make sure that we are  not the party of big business, big 
banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big  corporate loopholes, big anything,” 
Jindal told POLITICO in a 45-minute  telephone interview. “We cannot be, we 
must 
not be, the party that simply  protects the rich so they get to keep their 
toys.” 
He was just as blunt on how the GOP  should speak to voters, criticizing 
his party for offending and speaking  down to much of the electorate. 
“It is no secret we had a number of  Republicans damage our brand this year 
with offensive, bizarre comments —  enough of that,” Jindal said. “It’s 
not going to be the last time anyone  says something stupid within our party, 
but it can’t be tolerated within  our party. We’ve also had enough of this 
dumbed-down conservatism. We need  to stop being simplistic, we need to 
trust the intelligence of the  American people and we need to stop insulting 
the intelligence of the  voters.” 
Calling on the GOP to be “the party  of ideas, details and intelligent 
solutions,” the Louisianan urged the  party to “stop reducing everything to 
mindless slogans, tag lines,  30-second ads that all begin to sound the same. “ 
He added: “Simply being the  anti-Obama party didn’t work. You can’t beat 
something with nothing. The  reality is we have to be a party of solutions 
and not just bumper-sticker  slogans but real detailed policy solutions.” 
Now in his second-term as governor,  Jindal, 41, will formally take over 
the Republican Governors Association  this week at the group’s annual 
post-election conference. He has kept  quiet in the days following the GOP’s 
defeat 
last week, but his pointed  comments reflect his intent on playing an active 
role in the party’s  conversation and perhaps to pursue a presidential bid 
when his term is up  at the start of _2016._ 
(http://www.politico.com/tag/2016)  
If he does consider a White House  run, his analysis Monday suggests he’s 
aligning himself with an emerging  school of thought on the right that the GOP
’s consecutive White House  defeats can’t merely be solved by passing an 
immigration reform bill and  appealing more directly to nonwhites. Jindal, a 
Brown Graduate and Rhodes  Scholar, is already a favorite of conservative 
intellectuals and his  assessment that Republican difficulties owe as much to 
economics as  demographics will be well-received by right-leaning thinkers. 
Since last  week, a sort of backlash to the backlash has sprouted up, with 
some  conservatives castigating what they see as too much knee-jerk pandering 
on  immigration and not enough discussion of what they see as the party’s  
unimaginative, donor-driven fiscal policies. 
Jindal, the son of Indian  immigrants, said the GOP “must reject identity 
politics” and “treat folks  as individuals, as Americans, not as members of 
special interest  groups.” 
Raising Romney’s damaging comments  about voters who don’t pay income 
taxes, Jindal urged the GOP to make  clear they want the support of every 
American. 
“The Republican Party is going to  fight for every single vote,” he said. “
That means the 47 percent and the  53 percent, that means any other 
combination of numbers going up to 100  percent.” 
On cultural issues, he suggested the  party not retreat from its stances 
opposing abortion rights and gay  marriage but rather soften its tone on such 
matters. 
Jindal was less forthcoming on  immigration reform. He said the border 
needed to be secured but dodged  repeated questions about whether he supports 
giving those in the country  illegally a path to permanent residence or wants 
them deported. 
On what could be a litmus test issue  in a future GOP primary, he 
effectively punted to Obama. 
“I think the president has said he  wants to present a comprehensive 
approach; I think we as a party need to  hear what he has to say and offer our 
ideas.” 
Where Jindal showed a bit more  daring was on the banking industry, 
something that Obama blistered Romney  on and to which the GOP nominee offered 
little response. 
Declaring that Republicans “can’t be  beholden to special interests or 
banks,” the successor to Huey P. Long  indicated support for provisions in the 
Dodd-Frank law, which requires  banks to increase their reserves to prevent 
future taxpayer-funded  bailouts. 
Even more notably, Jindal suggested  he’d look favorably on something akin 
to the “Volcker rule.” 
“You’ve seen some conservatives come  around to the idea that if banks are 
going to be using FDIC-insured  deposits, they shouldn’t be allowed to 
co-mingle those funds with some of  their riskier investment banking activity,” 
Jindal said. “There needs to  be stronger walls between insured deposits, 
the taxpayer protected side of  business and riskier side of business that 
generate these risks and  profits.” 
Asked if Wall Street generally has  too much influence on Republicans, he 
said: “I think special interests in  general have certainly too much 
influence in Washington, D.C.” 
In comments that will raise eyebrows  among some of the RGA’s donors, 
Jindal decried “agnostic” lobbyists who  work both parties. 
“They’re access donors because they  know whoever is in power — that’s 
who they want to be friends with to get  their special perks in the Tax Code,” 
he said. 
Jindal said he didn’t want to see  tax rate increases but called for broad 
tax reform to rid the code of  loopholes and make it fairer for more 
Americans. 
“Depending on the other reforms that  are made, certainly I’d be open to 
the idea of having more deductions,  credits available to lower-income 
[filers],” he said. 
As to whether that includes the tax  breaks on carried interest and for 
corporate jets — the latter of which  could be called a “toy” for the rich — 
Jindal reiterated that he wanted  keep all ideas on the table. 
His home-state critics will argue  that his rhetoric doesn’t match his 
policies — he’s currently taking heat  for deep cuts to Louisiana’s public 
hospital system. But the governor said  Republicans should frame themselves as 
on the side of the  people. 
“We’re a populist party and we’ve  got to make that clear going forward,” 
he said. 
To Jindal, that means improving the  quality of education for kids across 
class and racial lines. The author of  a major school reform bill this year, 
he said education is one example of  how government needs to be changed to 
adapt to the times. 
“Let the dollar follow the child  instead of making the child follow the 
dollar,” he said of his policies to  support charter, private and home 
schooling. 
More broadly, he called for “a  bottom-up government that fits the digital 
age.” 
In terms of being more imaginative  on policy, he gently rebuked his own 
party on energy by hinting that he  had little use for the “Drill, Baby, Drill”
 sloganeering on oil  production. 
“When we talk about energy policy,  it cannot simply just be ‘drill more,’ 
it has to be more than that — it  has to be comprehensive,” he said, 
calling for expanded oil and gas  exploration while also looking more favorably 
than some Republicans on  renewable-energy solutions. 
Jindal, decrying the GOP’s tendency  to reminisce about how things were “
better in the good ol’ days,” is  tougher on his party’s tone than its 
substance. He’s an unapologetic  conservative who doesn’t want to deviate from 
small-government principles.  But he’s firing a warning to Republicans that 
they must change how they’re  perceived. 
“You’ve got to give the president’s  team credit: They did a very good job 
portraying the Republican Party as  wanting to just preserve the status quo 
for those who’ve already been  successful and burn the bridge behind them,”
 he acknowledged. “That’s not  what we as a party stand for and what we as 
a party can stand  for.” 
Asked directly if he would run for  president, Jindal dodged. 
“I got the best job in the world and  I’m going to be focused on being 
governor of this great state for the next  three years and being chairman of 
RGA next year and getting a bunch of  great Republican governors elected,” he 
said.   
© 2012 POLITICO  LLC

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to