Psyblog
no date
 
 
Why People Believe Weird Things 
and 8 Ways to Change Their Minds
 
 
Some  people believe all kinds of weird stuff including...
...no, actually, for a very good psychological reason I'm not going to 
repeat  any of it here. 
Let's just say that some people believe weird stuff and leave it at that. 
It  turns out that just one of the fascinating reasons that people accept odd 
ideas  is that they keep getting repeated, even if only to debunk them. 
So, where does all this misinformation come from, why do people believe it  
and how can right-thinking people counter it? 
(The following is based on an _excellent  article by Professor Stephan 
Lewandowsky and colleagues_ (http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018) ). 
Where misinformation comes from
1. Rumours and fiction
People love sensational stories. They like to pass on tales that make the  
listener very happy, disgusted or afraid: anything that provokes a strong  
emotional response. 
Neutral stories, which are probably more likely to be true, but much more  
boring, therefore get short shrift. 
More bizarrely, people have been shown to believe things that they've read 
in  novels that have clearly been totally made up. This is true even when: 
    *   They are obviously works of fiction, 
    *   and when they are told the fiction contains misinformation, 
    *   and when the real facts are relatively well-known.
This may be partly because people's defences tend to be lower when they're  
consuming popular entertainments. 
2. Politicians
We may all be aware that politicians will say anything to get elected, but  
can we tell the difference between the truth and the lies they've told? 
Studies have found that, in fact, people find it very difficult tell the  
difference. It seems that knowing that politicians lie is no barrier to 
people  believing those lies. 
3. The Media
The usual sources of misinformation in the media are oversimplification and 
 the need for providing balance. 
The need for balance is an interesting one because the issues themselves  
aren't always 'balanced'. For example over 95% of climate scientists agree 
that  the Earth is warming due to greenhouse-gas emissions, but you wouldn't 
know that  from many media debates on the issue, which are hobbled by the 
perceived need to  always provide a 'balanced' viewpoint. 
4. The Internet
There are a lot of good things to be said about the internet but it's still 
a  source of fantastic amounts of misinformation. Here's a frightening 
fact: 
"A survey of the first 50 Web sites matching the search term "weight loss  
diets" revealed that only 3 delivered sound dietary advice."
Plus people tend to seek out information that confirms their existing 
points  of view. And this is an exercise that has become much easier now the 
internet  provides such a huge range of viewpoints. No matter what people 
believe they can  find some other people who also believe it to back them up. 
Why people believe misinformation
It's pretty clear that lies and misinformation are floating about all over  
the place. But if we all know that politicians, the media and the internet  
sometimes lie, then how come some people end up believing it? 
The problem is that the way people go about believing things (or not) is  
fundamentally weird. Few bother actually checking the facts for themselves; 
the  majority use these mental short-cuts: 
    *   Does it feel right? In other words does the new  information square 
with what I already believe? For example, a Republican is  more likely to 
accept untruths about where President Obama was born because  the lie is 
convenient. 
    *   Does it make sense? Things that are easy to understand  are easier 
to believe. The mind repels complicated stuff, defending itself by  saying: 
oh, it's probably a lie (see my previous article: _8  Studies Demonstrating 
the Power of Simplicity_ 
(http://www.spring.org.uk/2010/03/8-studies-demonstrating-the-power-of-simplicity.php)
 ). 
    *   Is the source believable? People who seem authoritative,  like 
those in positions of power, are more likely to be believed. For example,  
doctors can create havoc by giving bad advice in public because people tend to  
believe them. 
    *   Who else believes it? People prefer to go along with the  herd. 
Unfortunately people also have in inbuilt bias towards thinking that  most 
other people agree with them, even if, in reality, they don't (see: _Why  We 
All 
Stink as Intuitive Psychologists: The False Consensus  Effect_ 
(http://www.spring.org.uk/2007/11/why-we-all-stink-as-intuitive.php) ).
But this still doesn't explain why people continue to believe all kinds of  
weird stuff, even after it's been proven to them that it's false. It  turns 
out that even once misinformation has been completely retracted and those  
involved have admitted it was lies, the misinformation is difficult to kill. 
There are all sorts of reasons but one is based on how memory works: we 
tend  to find it much easier to recall the gist of things rather than the exact 
 details. Usually this is handy because it means we can learn specific 
things,  say that cooking beef makes it easier to digest, and generalise it to 
the fact  that cooking makes many foods more palatable. 
The down side of this is that it's easy for people to remember the gist of  
some piece of misinformation (the moon is made of cheese), but forget that 
they  heard it from a totally unreliable source (a mischievous child). 
8 ways to counter misinformation
So, is it possible to kill off misinformation? Lewandowsky and co-authors 
say  yes, but it's hard and you will need help from these 8 psychological  
techniques: 
1. More than the truth
Changing people's minds isn't just about telling them they are wrong; if 
only  it were. To be convinced people need to hear an alternative account that 
 explains why something happened, not just that the  misinformation is 
wrong. Ideally it should also explain the motivations for the  lie. 
2. Short and sweet
This alternative account, though, shouldn't be too complicated. The shorter 
 it is, the sweeter it will work. Give people too much and they switch off: 
just  a few salient facts will do. 
3. Don't repeat the myth
Try to avoid repeating the myth. Remember that people find the gist of 
things  easiest to recall. If you keep repeating the myth, you're shooting 
yourself in  the foot. 
4. Here comes some misinformation...
You'll have to repeat the myth once, though, so people know what you're  
talking about. So tell them beforehand that there is misleading information  
coming. 
5. Facts facts facts
Then, after the myth, keep repeating the facts. Each repetition builds up 
the  rebuttal's strength in people's minds. The power of repetition to 
influence  people is clear, see: _The Illusion  of Truth_ 
(http://www.spring.org.uk/2010/12/the-illusion-of-truth.php) . 
6. Attack the source
What is the source of the misinformation? And what do they know? Nothing!  
Encouraging people to be a little more sceptical can help. 
One of the challenges here is that people tend to believe those who say  
things that fit in with their worldview. So that's why it's important to... 
7. Affirm world-view
You have to keep the audience onside, even if you're telling them things 
they  don't want to hear. You can do this by framing things within the 
audience's  world-view. For example you might say to a 'birther': "Hey, neither 
of 
us likes  Obama or his politics, but the fact is he was born in Hawaii." 
Telling people things they don't want to hear is a balancing act. You've 
got  to go far enough to make the point, but not so far as to put them off. 
8. Affirm identity
Another way of avoiding people's natural resistance to facts they find  
unpleasant is to get them to affirm their identity. So you might indirectly get 
 people to think about things that are important to them like their family, 
 friends and ideals. 
Research suggests this helps people deal with inconsistencies between their 
 beliefs and the new information that is conflicting with it. 
Mud sticks
Of course all these techniques are already used by opinion-formers and  
influencers, which is why it's so important to know about them. As Lewandowsky  
and colleagues conclude: 
"Correcting misinformation is cognitively indistinguishable from  
misinforming people to replace their preexisting correct beliefs. It follows  
that it 
is important for the general public to have a basic understanding of  
misinformation effects... Widespread awareness of the fact that people may  
"throw mud" because they know it will "stick"...will contribute to a  
well-informed populace."

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to