c|net
 
 
A conversation with Microsoft's marketing strategist
In an interview, David Webster talks about the future of  Microsoft's 
advertising, the impending launch of Natal and Windows Phone, and  the 
challenges 
of going up against Apple. 
 
 
by _Ina Fried_ ()  
March 29, 2010 4:00 AM PDT 

 
SAN FRANCISCO--David Webster had a pretty busy year in 2009, trying to  
convince the world that_Windows 7_ (http://www.cnet.com/windows-7/)  was their 
idea and adding the word Bing to  their collective vocabulary. 
That said, Microsoft's chief marketing strategist doesn't foresee much time 
 to rest. This year, all Webster has to do is persuade consumers that 
Office is  cool, that Mom and Dad need their own_Xbox_ 
(http://www.cnet.com/xbox-360/) , and that a Windows Phone can be a credible  
alternative to the 
iPhone. Luckily, Microsoft is willing to spend a few bucks to  do all that. 
"We're in a mode now where we are spending more money on advertising...than 
 we have ever spent before," Webster said, during a lunch meeting last 
week.  Microsoft doesn't break out figures, but the company is expected to 
spend 
 roughly the same amount on advertising in 2010 as it did last  year.

 
Microsoft plans to continue using the voice of customers to speak for the  
company. Webster said that Apple created a great opportunity for Microsoft 
when  it turned Windows into the stodgy PC guy played by John Hodgman.  
"Ultimately they made the choice to anthropomorphize the hardware platform 
to  a human being," Webster said. "In so doing they are making a statement 
about our  customers, not just our products. I think a lot of the work that 
we do really  does do a nice job of taking that back and saying 'we're proud 
of who our  customers are as they are proud of us.'" 
That effort will likely spill over as Microsoft looks to do more  
consumer-oriented advertising for Office 2010. 
Webster notes that while many people use Office for mundane tasks, the  
software also has surprising uses, ranging from a person who plans race course  
tracks in OneNote to people designing needlework in Excel. One friend of 
Webster  does his Passover seder in PowerPoint with embedded sound clips from 
Charlton  Heston in "The Ten Commandments."  
"Office has a richer story to tell than we sometimes give them credit," he  
said. "People actually do a fascinating array of things." 
One of the challenges for Webster and his team is that Microsoft's 
marketing  dollars are split between categories where it is the 800-pound 
gorilla--like  Windows and Office--and those where it is the upstart, such as 
Bing and 
Windows  Phone. Although it is nice to be the leader, Webster says that 
products like  Bing give the company more of a chance to experiment with new 
types of  advertising. 
For Windows, Microsoft plans to continue the current "Windows 7 is my idea" 
 _campaign_ (http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-31012_7-10384068-10355804.html) , 
 which Webster insists still has legs. 
"We really think that we touched a nerve there," Webster said. It says we  
made your priorities our priorities. We focused on the things that you care  
about in focusing our R&D efforts." 
That idea could span to other parts of the Windows business beyond the  
operating system, he said. 
"It's actually an interesting way to think about talking about IE or 
Windows  Live or even some of the PCs that our (hardware) partners are bringing 
to 
 market." 
Not all of Microsoft's bets last year paid off. For example, the company  
signed a deal for Windows 7 to _sponsor a variety show  by the creators of 
"Family Guy,"_ (http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10374323-56.html)  only to 
promptly _pull the  sponsorship_ 
(http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10383502-56.html)  when the event proved too 
risque. Webster said that's probably  an 
example where the company has a challenge both protecting the brand and  
keeping it relevant for a new generation. 
"On the one hand, you can say 'Had you ever seen the Family Guy?'" Webster  
said. "Clearly we had. The issue was, if you want to reach a more student  
population, if you want to give Windows some cultural relevance with the 
younger  population, 'Family Guy' is a property certainly (that could do 
that)." 
He said that the idea sounded good on paper. "It's not crazy," he said. 
That  said, as the event got closer and the company saw the scripts, it became 
clearer  that it was not such a great fit. "I always say we reserve the 
right to wake up  smarter every day and make better decisions. As we learned, 
as 
we got closer, we  were able to call an audible (and pull out)." 
And, while the idea of _house parties for  Windows 7_ 
(http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10384098-56.html)  might have been a good 
idea, Webster 
concedes the _companion  instructional videos_ 
(http://cnettv.cnet.com/special-report-windows-7-house-party/9742-1_53-50077452.html)
  were "cheesy." 
But, all-in-all, he said he applauds the fact that Microsoft is willing to  
push the envelope more. 
"In the tech space, when you look at the companies competitively that we 
are  going up against, I don't see a lot of risk taking, of being out there, 
in the  moment," Webster said.  
On the phone front, Webster notes that Microsoft has a challenge in going 
up  against Apple, which is both the market leader and spends a fortune on 
its  advertising for the iPhone. But he said, the big brands--Apple, 
BlackBerry,  and_Android_ (http://www.cnet.com/android-atlas/) --have kind of 
established their niche in the  smartphone market. 
"We're coming back to this party after the other guys have already played  
their hand," he said. "From a design standpoint, they are all more or less  
locked into the decisions they have made." 
I pointed out that Microsoft appears to be going after a similar approach 
as  Palm did with the Pre--positioning its device as the right phone for your 
whole  life.< 
"In  the tech space, when you look at the companies competitively that we 
are going  up against, I don't see a lot of risk taking, of being out there, 
in the  moment."  
-- David  Webster , chief marketing strategist, Microsoft 

"They probably did research that was similar to the research we did," he  
said. "I think they found some similar findings. There's a degree to which we 
 deliver on that promise a little bit more holistically...I like our 
business  odds." 
As for Natal, Webster said that Microsoft does plan a big push, but he  
declined to give many hints. The Xbox add-on won't use Natal in its name, 
though  he wouldn't say how it would be branded. 
For his part, Webster is not your typical Microsoft guy. He was hired by  
Microsoft back in 2001 when he was working at branding consultant 
_Siegel+Gale_ (http://www.siegelgale.com/) . He was pitching Microsoft for  
some 
business and was hired by Mich Mathews, the senior vice president in charge  of 
the company's marketing. Webster did move from the East Coast to Redmond,  
Wash., but eventually convinced Mathews to let him move his family back to  
Connecticut where he could be close to both New York ad agencies, as well as 
the  rest of his family, which he said are all congregated within about 30 
miles of  Manhattan. 
Among Webster's ideas was _the  Mojave Experiment_ 
(http://news.cnet.com/microsoft-looks-to-mojave-to-revive-vistas-image/) , 
where Microsoft filmed 
users' reactions with Windows  Vista without telling them what operating 
system they were using. He's also been  a big proponent of the _need  to do a 
better job of naming products_ 
(http://news.cnet.com/Microsoft-looks-to-improve-its-name-game/2100-1024_3-6196967.html)
 . Even features within key 
products, he  said, should be "word-of-mouthable." Webster points to the Shake 
and 
Snap  features of Windows 7 as examples of features that have simple, 
easy-to-remember  names. 
That was also the goal, he said, with Bing. The company had several 
criteria  in rebranding the search engine, he said. The company wanted a name 
that 
was one  syllable and couldn't be misspelled and was as short as possible. 
Webster said he initially came up with "Bang." The name had a few things  
going for it, he noted. "It's there, it's an exclamation point," he said. 
"It's  the opposite of a question mark." 
But somehow it didn't work as well when used as a verb. 
"Oh, I banged it' is very different than 'I binged it'," he said. 
In the end, he said, Bing proved to be a near-perfect choice, representing  
what he called "the sound of found." 
"We really hit the jackpot with Bing," he  said.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to