Ernie, Interesting parallel to the Dred Scott decision. In this case, there is no US Constitution or Supreme Court as a higher authority to overturn the decision. The UN is pretty much the highest international authority in a situation like this.
Chris -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dr. Ernest Prabhakar Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 12:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RC] End of the Global Open Internet Hi Chris, On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Chris Hahn <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. This was off my radar. I am not sure how much difference this is going to make. Even without a UN treaty, China and other countries have done a great job of e-censorship. I'd heard about this, but hadn't paid much interest. I do think that the article is overly dramatic, but still somewhat justified. Before, countries that censored the Internet were considered "rogue", and other countries were free to sell technology that undermined those efforts. Now, the countries that censor can claim treaty-level validation, which puts the "open" guys on the moral defensive. Think of it like the Dredd Scott decision. :-/ -- Ernie P. -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
