from the site :  silouan
 
 
What will American Christianity look like in 50 years?
 

 
I was asked this in an online forum, and my answer got too long to manage.  
Here’s my infallible prediction. How did I do? 
    *   Orthodoxy: Little visible change, zero substantive  change. 
Increasing numbers and cultural impact. Progress toward a single  American 
Archdiocese, but still not there yet. 
    *   Catholicism: Neither women priests nor married priests  will 
happen. Increasing disaffection among liberal American Catholics leading  to a 
significant decrease in attendance. Identification as Catholic will be  
increasingly cultural rather than creedal. This trend, combined with  
decreasing 
numbers of men seeking the priesthood, will force additional parish  churches 
to close. This will be slightly offset by conversions from  Protestantism, 
resulting in American Catholic liturgy and pastoral care  becoming 
effectively more traditional. In northern Europe, Catholicism may  fade into a 
cultural memory, but in North America, a leaner, more boldly  traditional 
Catholicism will recover its equilibrium and continue to be a  voice of 
conscience 
and stability. 
    *   Reformed Christians: Continuing personality issues, but  overall 
the hardcore Reformed will still look and act a lot like they do  today, 
because (almost uniquely among Protestants) Reformed folks know and  value 
their 
tradition. The edgy/emergey segment will contribute a few cultural  
differences. 
    *   Lutherans, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, UCC: Increasing  
convergence so that they resemble each other almost interchangeably, while  
de-emphasizing troublesome doctrinal issues until their emphasis on social  
issues 
rather than personal salvation turns them into Christian-branded social  
service agencies. In each movement the conservative outliers will continue to  
peel off in schisms embodying a previous generation’s norm. Many of these  
etremely conservative daughter groups will identify strongly with the little-o  
orthodox “_Great Tradition_ 
(http://www.inhabitatiodei.com/2007/11/13/the-great-tradition-of-the-church/) ” 
(cf. _Tom Oden_ 
(http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-21-number-1/bringing-forward-tradition-interview-thoma
s-c-oden) ) 
    *   Anglicanism outside the US and UK: Few significant or  visible 
changes, except increasing numbers, especially in Africa and Latin  America, 
where Anglicanism is conservative in liturgy and ethos. 
    *   Conservative Anglicans, Lutherans, Methodists in North  America: I 
foresee growth and prosperity for individual parishes and  dioceses, but 
overall a continuing fragmentation. Fifty years ago, these  groups were 
culturally relevant and could provide nostalgia for returning  Christians; now, 
in 
increasingly-unchurched America, they’re culturally  unfamiliar but not yet 
old enough to make a virtue of ancient weirdness the  way Eastern Orthodox 
do. 
    *   Non-charismatic nondenominations will find their kids  growing up 
effectively charismatic nondenoms, with more affinity for  styles of 
contemporary music than for their parents’ doctrinal  self-definition. The 
trend of 
people choosing congregations based on music and  childcare will continue to 
grow. In-depth teaching of historical doctrine will  continue to be a 
novelty. 
    *   Baptist will continue to be a useless word for describing  a set of 
beliefs or practices, as practically every form of Christian belief  and 
worship can be found among self-described Baptists. 
    *   Charismatic nondenominations: Same story. In the absence  of 
doctrinal accountability, these will continue to generate new approaches  and 
practices every decade or two. 
    *   Old-school Pentecostals (e.g. Foursquare, Assemblies of  God, 
Church of God in Christ, Church of God of Prophecy) in suburbs and  wealthy 
areas 
will continue to develop in unpredictable ways, ensuring that  every 
generation is nostalgic for a lost experience and baffled by what their  
churches 
have become. In the 90s and 00s, the _Toronto  Blessing_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_blessing) , _Brownsville Revival_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownsville_Revival) , _Kansas City Prophets_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_City_Prophets#Kansas_City_Prophets) , and 
new prosperity 
teachings revisited  mid-20th-century phenomena such as the _Latter Rain_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latter_Rain_(post–World_War_II_movement)) , 
_Manifest 
Sons of  God_ (http://op.50megs.com/ditc/kingdom4.htm) , and the _earlier 
health-and-prosperity_ (http://www.mtio.com/articles/bissar51.htm)  movement 
springing from _EW Kenyon_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._W._Kenyon) .  
But the more recent iteration was characterized by a new cultural ignorance of 
 Christian belief or history, which freed it to become crazier, faster. By  
contrast, change in urban, inner-city contexts and in rural areas will be  
minimal: Urban churches will continue to be matriarchal and rural churches  
patriarchal.
TL;DR: in 50 years you’ll see recognizable Orthodox,  Catholics and Reformed
… and a vast spectrum of Everybody Else, many of them  changing in 
significant ways and seeing that as a  virtue.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to