Dec  17, 2012 03:27 PM ESTTheWashingtonPost  
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/campus-overload/post/u-md-big-ten-move-student-government-left-out-of-
discussion-and-decision-making/2012/12/17/bf379692-449e-11e2-8e70-e199352822
2d_blog.html#license-bf379692-449e-11e2-8e70-e1993528222d)  
U-Md. Big Ten move: Student  government left out of discussion and 
decision-making
By _Jenna Johnson_ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/jenn
a-johnson/2011/02/16/AB6ArDH_page.html) 

 

At about 3:20  a.m. on Nov. 19, the day that the University of Maryland 
would publicly  announce it had _joined the Big Ten Conference_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/colleges/maryland-to-big-ten-its-money-versus-traditio
n/2012/12/11/3c5da16c-3fd0-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_story.html) , the student 
 government’s top leaders released a formal one-page letter supporting the 
move.  
Throughout that whirlwind day,  U-Md. _President Wallace D. Loh_ 
(http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-01-29/local/35440901_1_wallace-d-loh-student-n
ewspaper-campus)  kept a printout of  that letter in his suit jacket 
pocket. He referenced it when asking the _University System of Maryland Board 
of  
Regents_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/campus-overload/post/details-emerge-about-university-system-of-maryland-regents-private-meetings/2012/11/21
/4c7be7f4-33df-11e2-bb9b-288a310849ee_blog.html)  to bless the move. And he 
quoted from it when speaking at a  televised news conference. 
”If you will permit me,” Loh said in his closing remarks, “I will read 
just  one sentence, because that student was able to write in one sentence what 
has  taken me many, many minutes to say: ‘Although we mourn the traditions 
that would  inevitably be lost, joining the Big Ten would fundamentally 
transform our  university for the better.’” 

The men in suits who moved Maryland to the Big Ten. (Patrick  McDermott - 
Getty Images) This was not a piece of support that Loh  had solicited. In the 
days leading up to the announcement, Loh quietly and  quickly reached out 
to about _two dozen of the school’s most powerful and  valued liaisons_ 
(http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-26/local/35511944_1_loh-big-ten-univer
sity-system) , including politicians and major donors — but not students  
on his campus. 
One student was briefed on the topic on the weekend the deal was reached:  
Steven Hershkowitz, a U-Md. graduate student who is the student member of 
the  Board of Regents. Hershkowitz did not brief the student government, 
according to  its leaders. When asked about his role, Hershkowitz wrote in an 
e-mail: ”I  prefer not to be interviewed about this story anymore.” 
What about the student government? Sure, on most campuses student-led  
governing bodies are occasionally questioned or mocked for appearing to lack  
true power. But these students are elected by their peers to provide a  
collective voice for the student body. University presidents typically consult  
the student body president, if not the whole group, in some way before making 
a  major decision. 
U-Md. _Student Government Association_ 
(http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-03-16/local/35260762_1_gender-gap-student-presidents-american-student-go
vernment-association)  President  Samantha Zwerling said that Loh usually 
consults with her. “I don’t know what  happened,” she said. Loh has said he 
was bound from widely discussing the  potential conference change by 
confidentiality agreements.  
“We didn’t have any inside knowledge about this,” Zwerling said. “We 
heard  about it like everyone else when it broke online.” 
As news of the potential conference change consumed Facebook and Twitter  
feeds, students looked for any proof it was true — and rumors swirled as to w
hy  administrators had reserved a ballroom in the student union for Monday  
afternoon. 
Zwerling decided that the student government needed to do something. The 
full  legislature wasn’t scheduled to meet until later in the week, but the 
SGA  executive board’s dozen or so members had a meeting scheduled for Sunday  
evening. Zwerling scrapped her regular agenda and decided to focus on the 
Big  Ten. She e-mailed members links to news articles to study and consulted 
with a  few students who are “super fans.” 
As they gathered in the student government office, the leaders of the 
student  government debated what to do. Someone suggested starting a petition 
to 
get  student input. Someone else suggested that they criticize the president 
for  leaving students out of this important decision. 
“We’re just going to sound like cranks if we do that,” Matt Arnstine, the  
SGA’s director of communications, recalls saying. “We decided: ‘Let’s get 
behind  this now.’... We were all like: ‘What’s done is done. But we can 
have a say in  how this money is spent going forward.’” 
The executive board then voted  to support the university’s move to the Big 
Ten and decided to _draft an open letter_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/terrapins-insider/wp/2012/11/19/maryland-big-ten-student-government-endor
ses-conference-switch/)  explaining why.  
It took more than six hours for  the group to draft a letter that said 
everything they wanted to say: Support  Maryland’s move to the Big Ten 
Conference, encourage an increased flow of money  to the athletic department’s “
precarious financial situation,” give a shout-out  to the _Big Ten’s academic 
consortium_ 
(http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-20/local/35511758_1_cic-schools-country)
 , urge the  president to bring back some of the _seven 
athletic teams he cut_ 
(http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-07-02/sports/35486395_1_athletic-programs-track-program-athletic-director-kevin-anderson)
 
 earlier this  year, and check to make sure that the move “does not revolve 
solely around  football or even athletics.”  
They also included one line of criticism, which they said was watered down 
as  the night wore on: “As we move forward, we ask that decisions that 
affect the  entire University community be dealt with in a more transparent 
manner.” 
At about 3 a.m. — long after the student union closed, and they were 
supposed  to leave — Arnstine declared that they had to stop obsessing over 
grammar and  wording choices. They needed to send the letter. 
The final piece was copy-and-pasted onto student government stationary and  
mass-e-mailed (and tweeted) out. The 440-word explanation of why the SGA  
executive board was behind the move was likely the first lengthy written  
argument for the Big Ten that many students or faculty read outside of media  
reports. 
Hours later, the University  System of Maryland _regents voted to approve 
the move_ (http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-20/local/35
510689_1_university-system-regents-public-vote) . Students  then waited hours 
for Loh to 
make the formal announcement at an afternoon news  conference, flanked by 
coaches and administrators but no students. 
Loh did reach out to the student government to thank them for the letter,  
according to the student leaders. Here’s a copy of the  letter:

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to