I got my geology degree at a strongly Christian college.  I find no conflict
with geologic time and the Christian faith.  Jesus spoke in parables.  There
is no reason that the Genesis version of creation needs to be taken more
literally than a parable.  If it understood that God created the heavens and
the earth, then the details of counting exact epochs, years, or days is
non-essential.  The key is the belief that it is God's creation: the more
magnificent the mechanism, the better.  It is hard to not look in wonder at
the mid-Atlantic ridge (plate tectonics), a coral reef (limestone creation),
or a majestic mountain range that is rising at a measurable rate.

 

Chris

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [RC] Greenland

 

 

 

The following article is interesting to anyone who is concerned with

pre-history.  Or geo-history / geology + history.

.

It also provides evidence that so-called "young earth" creationism

is fallacious. If, that is, evidence actually matters to some  people.

.

Other evidence doesn't seem to matter, like mid-Atlantic 

ocean ridges and sea-floor spreading,  with mirror-image

magnetic patterns on either side of the ridge indicating

an orderly process of sea floor expansion over 

millions of years. And there is the history of minerals

like zircon, which point to an era billions of years ago

when many examples of the mineral were formed.

.

Young earthers seem oblivious  to  all of this evidence,

I guess they don't like geology.

.

The thing abut geology is that it works. What geologists say should

be there, is there, based on empirical models /  geohistorical models.

And so we have oil, coal, and all kinds of other valuable substances

that can actually be found and recovered. Meanwhile the

predictive value of the young earth hypothesis is zero.

.

.

 

 

 

 

Billy

.

.

.

_________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real Clear Politics / Real Clear Science

 

January 17, 2013 


DNA Reconstructs Greenland's Lush Landscape


By
<http://www.realclearscience.com/authors/?author=Anne-Katrine+Faber&id=24455
> Anne-Katrine Faber

Editor's Note: This article was provided by our partner, ScienceNordic
<http://sciencenordic.com/> . ...

Imagine standing on a large green meadow scanning the surrounding
countryside. On the 

horizon you can see a mountain crest rising. 

There's snow on top of it, but around you, the landscape is green and lush
with a host of different trees, plants and insects. Does this sound like
Greenland?

Not today's Greenland, no. But finds of fossil DNA from soil residues
embedded in the ice sheet have previously indicated that this was what
Greenland looked like more than 400,000 years ago.

The frozen DNA is not directly accessible, but using ice cores drilled down
through the ice sheet, scientists have gained access to the base of the ice
sheet.

Astrid Schmidt is one of the few researchers in the world who works with DNA
in ice cores. She recently defended her PhD thesis and currently works as a
postdoc at the Centre for GeoGenetics and the Centre for Ice and Climate,
both based at Copenhagen University.

Her work includes determining the species of the DNA that's buried in the
ice cores to gather information about the biology of ancient Greenland.

This is a job which brings her from the remotest regions of Greenland to the
sterile laboratories in Copenhagen and which consists of working at
temperatures well below the freezing point.

New Methods for Fossil DNA

Fossil DNA is normally found in permafrost because this environment acts as
a natural freezer, which preserves the fossil DNA for posterity.

But unlike permafrost, ice cores have a much lower concentration of genetic
material. It used to be difficult to find any DNA at all in the ice, but
this has now changed.

Recent technical advances have enabled researchers like Schmidt to find far
more genetic material than only a few years ago.

"It's a bit like searching around in a soup using a magnet," says Schmidt.

"If the magnet isn't strong, you only find the most frequently occurring
elements. If, however, you're using a really strong magnet, you can attract
more elements and you get a much broader picture of what the soup consists
of."

Different Plant and Insect Species Identified

This means that scientists can now use ice cores to learn about past
biodiversity.

One of the results of Schmidt's work is that DNA from a far wider range of
insect and plant species has now been identified in the ice.

One might wonder whether tiny amounts of biological material from an ice
core measuring only ten centimetres in diameter can give an adequate picture
of the entire wildlife in Greenland - a land mass covering an area almost
ten times the size of Denmark.

The explanation lies in the way the ice sheet moves.

"Since the ice moves slowly across the land, we now believe that the genetic
material that's accumulated at the bottom of the ice cores represents the
biodiversity in a wider area," she says.

Climate Research Could Benefit Too

Understanding past biodiversity is not only important from a biological and
evolutionary perspective. Climate researchers can also benefit from it.

Certain plant species, the so-called indicator species, only grow under
highly specific temperature conditions. The existence of a plant species can
therefore be used as a guideline for the temperature at the time when the
plant grew. Scientists are hoping to use this knowledge as a kind of DNA
thermometer.

Since DNA is best preserved in cold conditions, the researchers believe that
the genetic material they have found at the bottom of the ice cores stems
from the period immediately before the climate grew dramatically colder and
the ice sheet started to expand.

In this way, the species tell us something about the climate immediately
before Greenland became covered with ice, and the age of the DNA is used for
determining when this happened.

Covered by Ice for 400,000 Years

Schmidt's research has shown that northern Greenland has been covered by ice
for longer than previously thought.

There is a large degree of uncertainty when scientists determine the age of
DNA, which is why it's not easy to come up with a precise age at this point.

However, the results so far indicate that Greenland has been covered by ice
at least up to 400,000 years ago and possibly hundreds of thousands of years
before that.

The most surprising result shows that the ice sheet in northern Greenland
did not melt away during the Eemian <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eemian>
interglacial period more than 100,000 years ago, which was the most recent
period with a warmer climate than today.

DNA material from mammals such as wolves, deer or bears occur less
frequently than material from plant growth, and Schmidt and her colleagues
have yet to find any such DNA in Greenland.

Perhaps DNA material from large mammals is buried in the ice, or perhaps it
has already degraded.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to