Nepal: Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and Baha’is launch  appeal against 
anti conversion proposal
("Asia News," August 17,  2011) 
Kathmandu, Nepal – If approved by parliament, the new anti-conversion  
provisions in Nepal’s criminal code would jail anyone involved in preaching and 
 
handing out religious material. Anyone killing cattle for its meat would 
suffer  a similar fate. 
In reaction to the draft law, religious minorities have called for 
amendments  to the draft proposal because the suggested changes constitute a 
violation of  religious freedom and favour Hinduism. 
The decision to fight the new legislation was made at a conference held a 
few  days ago in Kathmandu by the Interreligious Secularism Protection 
Movement.  Proposed by Catholics, the event (pictured) brought together 
representatives of  various religious (Protestant, Muslim, Buddhist, Baha’i) 
and 
tribal communities  as well as leaders from different political parties. 
The proposed changes to the criminal code went before parliament on 23 
June,  and were immediately controversial, raising concerns among 
secular-oriented  parties and religious minorities. Parliament began debating 
the changes 
last  Sunday and will continue for several days. 
Under Article 160, anyone inducing a Hindu to convert to another religion  
could be prosecuted. Just talking about one’s religion to others could be 
deemed  proselytising and be punishable. Conviction could entail fines of up 
to US$ 700  and five years in jail. If the offender is not Nepali, he or she 
could be  immediately expelled. 
Religious leaders and secularists propose instead a minority law and the  
creation of a religious affairs commission to protect the rights of religious 
 minorities and guarantee everyone’s rights, including that of Hindus, to 
convert  to another religion. 
Even though the proposed changes have not yet been approved, many noted 
that  Hindu extremism is already growing inside Nepali institutions. This could 
offset  decades of struggle for democracy and the separation of state and 
religion. 
Amar Dhoj Tamang, a member of the Tamang tribe and vice president of the  
Tamsaling Party, said that members of this community were recently arrested 
in  Kathmandu for killing a cow for its meat. “For centuries, the Tamang have 
eaten  beef. Eating what we want is our right, but now we are even afraid 
of looking at  cows for fear of arrest,” he explained. 
For human rights activist Charan Prasai, Hindu fundamentalist groups want 
to  stir tensions in the population in order to undermine the legitimacy of 
the  secular state. In their view, people should have had the right to decide 
whether  to keep Hinduism as state religion or not when the monarchy fell 
in 2006.  However, in his view “fundamental rights like democracy and the 
separation of  state and religion cannot be approved or cancelled by will of 
the majority”. 
For Maoist Party member Binod Pahadi, unless changes are not made to the  
draft bill, the country will go back by 50 years. “If the proposal is 
approved  in parliament, meetings such as these will no longer be possible 
because 
we will  be accused of criticising the Hindu religion,” he said.  
____________________________________

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to