Wired
 
 
How Steve Jobs Turned Technology — And Apple — Into  Religion
 
    *   By Brett T. Robinson 
    *   08.08.13

 
 
 
 
(http://www.wired.com/opinion/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ipadrelease182.jpg)  
photo: Bryan Derballa/WIRED
“Much ink has been spilled drafting the Steve Jobs encomium.  But Jobs and 
Apple are interesting for far more than technological prowess —  they 
provide an allegory for reading religion in the information age. They are  
further 
evidence that shifts in popular religion throughout history are  
accompanied by changes in the media environment: when the dominant modes of  
communication change, so do the frameworks for religious belief. Still,  this 
shift 
would require a fitting mythology… 
An ancient Egyptian myth helps illuminate the perennial  relationship 
between media forms and metaphysical belief systems. The Egyptian  god Theuth 
visits King Thamus to show him that writing “once learned, will make  the 
Egyptians wiser and will improve their memory.” Thamus replies by  admonishing 
Theuth that his affection for writing prevents him from  acknowledging its 
pitfalls. Writing does not improve memory but makes students  more forgetful 
because they stop internalizing information. Writing also exposes  students to 
ideas without requiring careful contemplation, meaning they will  have “the 
appearance of wisdom” without true knowledge. 
The celebration of technological values in the Apple story  requires a 
similar response. The technological values promoted by Apple are part  of the 
Faustian bargain of technology, which both giveth and taketh away. 
King Thamus’ anxieties about the new media of writing  threatening wisdom 
have been resurrected in digital form. But Jobs confronted  the technology 
paradox by imagining technology as a tool for expanding  human consciousness 
rather than as a means of escape from it. The  tension between technology and 
spirituality was not a zero-sum game for him. 
The values promoted by Apple are part  of the Faustian bargain of 
technology, which both giveth and taketh away.
Jobs’ Zen master Kobun Chino told him that he “could keep in  touch with 
his spiritual side while running a business.” So in true Zen fashion,  Jobs 
avoided thinking of technology and spirituality in dualistic terms. But  what 
really set him apart was his ability to educate the public about personal  
computing in both practical and mythic ways. 
The iconography of the Apple computer company, the  advertisements, and the 
device screens of the Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, and iPad  are visual 
expressions of Jobs’ imaginative marriage of spiritual science and  modern 
technology. 
Apple Ads as Parables
Technology ads provide parables and proverbs for navigating  the 
complexities of the new technological order. They instruct the consumer on  how 
to 
live the “good life” in the technological age. 
Like all advertising, Apple’s ads perform a vital educational  function in 
consumer society. The advertisements are allegorical, rhetorical  attempts 
to domesticate foreign and abstract concepts, making them accessible  and 
attractive to everyday adherents. 
In fact, they resemble medieval morality plays in their  personification of 
good (Mac) and evil (PC). As such, the ads contain a moral —  or, more 
explicitly, they propose a morality customized for the conditions of  the age. 
 
 (http://www.wired.com/opinion) 
Media technology has acquired a moral status because it has  become part of 
the natural order of things. Luddites, those who have sworn off  new 
technologies, are the new heretics and illiterates. Technology is an  absolute. 
There is no turning back or imagining a different social order.  Challenge is 
acceptable as long as it remains within the confines of the  technological 
order. Apple may challenge Microsoft. Samsung may challenge Apple.  But the 
order must not be challenged. 
The impact of digital culture, then, is epistemic; it  insinuates a moral 
system based on its own internal logic. 
The underlying  message of the early Mac versus PC ads is not simply that 
the Apple operating  system is superior. The ads carry the implicit 
_assertion_ (http://youtu.be/R706isyDrqI)  that technology  always means human 
progress. 
In addition, the _personification_ (http://youtu.be/DZSBWbnmGrE)  of the  
operating systems by actors reinforces the notion that computers are 
extensions  of the human person. In this sense, the ads are not dualistic at 
all. 
Good  and evil, Mac and PC, man and machine are married in service of the 
progress  myth. 
The religion of technology is practiced in the ritual use of  technology 
and the worship of the self that the technologies ultimately  foster. 
Enter the Paradox
In the Greek  Narcissus myth, the young man is _captivated_ 
(http://youtu.be/Wc7fQEwI1Ls)  by his reflection in a pool of water. Marshall  
McLuhan 
reminds us that Narcissus was not admiring himself but mistook the  reflection 
in the water for another person. The point of the myth for McLuhan is  the 
fact that “men at once become fascinated by an extension of themselves in  any 
material other than themselves.” 
Eastern wisdom  traditions _seem fitting antidotes_ 
(http://www.wired.com/business/2013/06/meditation-mindfulness-silicon-valley/all/)
  for correcting 
the addiction and  narcissism fostered by media technologies. The Wisdom 2.0 
conference, for  example, held annually in California invites participants 
to learn techniques  for living with “greater presence, meaning, and 
mindfulness in the technology  age.” But the wisdom traditions themselves have 
been 
subsumed by the logic of  popular technology and consumerism. Participants 
pay upward of $1,500 to learn  mindfulness techniques from “the founders of 
Facebook, Twitter, eBay, Zynga, and  PayPal, along with wisdom teachers from 
various traditions.” 
‘Men at once become fascinated by an  extension of themselves in any 
material other than themselves.’
The top billing at the conference naturally belongs to the  technology 
gurus rather than the spiritual ones. And this confusion of  technological 
values with religious or spiritual ones is a product of a key  rhetorical trait 
shared by both: the paradox. 
To the nonbeliever, the paradoxes of religion are absurd and  irrational 
diversions. 
To the true believer, however, they are pathways to  enlightenment. 
Jobs’ affinity for  paradox in his technological and spiritual thinking may 
be partly attributed to  his “inexhaustible interest” in the works of 
William Blake, an  eighteenth-century romantic poet and mystic who, like Jobs, 
was a multimedia  artist who reveled in religious satire. Blake’s The 
Marriage of Heaven and  Hell was a _combination_ 
(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Marriage_of_Heaven_and_Hell)  
of poems, prose, and 
illustrations produced on a  series of etched plates — an eighteenth-century 
iPad, if 
you will. 
In a critique of the puritanical sentiment sweeping England in  the late 
eighteenth century, Blake presents a series of paradoxes aimed at  subverting 
conventional dualisms. In his Proverbs of Hell, he  shared that “The road of 
excess leads to the palace of wisdom” and  “You never know what is enough 
unless you know what is more than enough.” Blake  used the poem and 
illustrated plates to subvert traditional dualisms, to propose  an alternative 
cosmology in which good and evil were complementary forces for  human 
flourishing. Heaven represented restraint, while hell represented the  creative 
passions that give humans their joy and energy; the two worked together  in 
harmony 
to facilitate a more enlightened state of being. 
A key rhetorical trait shared by both  technology and religion is the 
paradox.
Steve Jobs resolved the paradoxes posed by technology in the  same spirit. 
Technology is a powerful medium for creative expression, but  absent 
restraint it has the potential to breed an enslaving addiction. Echoes of  
Blake’s 
paradoxical style can be heard in the advertising rhetoric of the Apple  
computer company. Some of the best proverbs come from the company’s most 
iconic  campaigns: 
    *   See why 1984 won’t be like “1984” (1984 Macintosh) 
    *   While some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius (1997 “
Think  Different” campaign) 
    *   Less is more (2003 PowerBook G4) 
    *   Random is the new order (2005 iPod shuffle) 
    *   Touching is believing (2007 iPhone) 
    *   Small is huge (2009 Mac mini)
The iPhone 5 launch in September 2012 announced “The biggest  thing to 
happen to iPhone since iPhone” and “So much more than before. And so  much 
less, too.” 
Jobs embraced elliptical thinking as a means of promoting  technology 
objects that pose their own paradoxes. In the Apple narrative, the  seemingly 
oppositional notions of assimilation/isolation and freedom/enslavement  are 
resolved by Apple’s invocation of enlightened paradox. 
The paradox today is that new media technologies connect us to  more people 
in more places. (Marshall McLuhan’s “global village” has been  invoked 
more than once). But at the same time, mediating relationships from  behind a 
screen breeds a pervasive sense of isolation. 
>From the farthest satellite to the  nearest cellphone, the mystical body of 
electricity connects us all.
In the Apple story, the brand cult began offline, with users  meeting in 
real, physical locations to swap programs and ideas. Now, the Apple  community 
is more diffuse, concentrated in online discussion groups and support  
forums. However, Apple product launches and conferences remain sacred  
pilgrimages where Apple fans can congregate, camp, and live together for days 
at  a 
time to revel in the communal joy of witnessing the transcendent moment of 
the  new product launch. 
The reverence once reserved for holy relics and liturgy has  reemerged in 
the technology subculture. The shared experience of living in a  highly 
technological era provides a universal ground for a pluralistic society.  There 
may be many different devices, but only one Internet. 
Technology has become the new taken-for-granted order that  requires our 
fidelity. Obedience to the new order is expressed in the  communication 
rituals that take place every day in the use of computers, music  players, and 
smartphones — devices that bind individuals together. From the  farthest 
satellite to the nearest cellphone, the mystical body of electricity  connects 
us 
all. Personal technology has become “the very atmosphere and medium”  
through which we mediate our daily lives. 
But the paradox  this media technology presents is the absence of presence. 
The age of  electric media is the age of discarnate man — persons 
communicating without  bodies. From the disembodied voice on the telephone to 
the 
faceless email  message, electronic communication trades human presence _for 
efficiency_ (http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/03/clive-thompson-2104/) . 
In order for such a form to become popular, it would take a  visionary like 
Jobs with both technical and humanistic sensibilities; someone to  assure 
the technological faithful that this dramatic change in human relations  was 
a good thing. 
The question that remains is whether this mode of perception  brings us any 
closer to recognizing the transcendent hidden at the heart of that  which 
is not digitized or downloaded. 
Adapted and excerpted  from _Appletopia_ 
(https://www.baylorpress.com/Book/382/Appletopia.html)  by Brett T. Robinson. 
Copyright 2013 by Baylor  
University Press. Reprinted by arrangement with Baylor University Press.   All 
rights reserved. 



-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to