W Post
August 24, 2013
 
Ballmer's departure will  follow years of missed opportunities for Microsoft
 
 
By _Craig Timberg_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/craig-timberg/2011/05/17/AFM2rbAH_page.html) 

 
 
< 
In the 13 years that _Steve Ballmer_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/microsoft-says-ceo-steve-ballmer-will-retire-in-12-months-stock-up/2013/08/
23/c1dac4cc-0bf5-11e3-89fe-abb4a5067014_story.html?hpid=z3)  has led 
Microsoft, literature has climbed  out of books, songs have freed themselves 
from 
CDs and computers have leapt off  their desktops — and into our hands. An 
exhilarating new world of technology has  emerged with little help from a 
company that once dominated the industry. 
Wall Street greeted word of Ballmer’s looming retirement with glee, bidding 
 up the company’s stock by more than 7 percent in the hours after Friday’s 
 announcement. But analysts say the firm’s fortunes still will face the 
_problem that undermined Ballmer_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/23/microsofts-decline-wasnt-steve-ballmers-fault/)
 : Microsoft’
s profits are  tied to the popularity of personal computers, a technology 
declining steadily in  our increasingly mobile world.



 
Ballmer, 57, recently had sought to pivot away from the PC, shifting  
strategy, instituting a _corporate shake-up_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/23/with-ballmer-out-microsoft-has-a-power-vacuum-to-fi
ll/)  and releasing new products aimed at the  tech-savvy consumers that 
long had shunned many Microsoft offerings. Yet, as  often was the case under 
his tenure, Ballmer moved too little, too late,  analysts said. 
“The big shift was mobile,” said J.P. Gownder, an industry analyst with  
Forrester. “He will be criticized, and rightly so, for having missed a  
revolution that was very clearly coming from the mid-’90s on.” 
Sales of smartphones rose 46 percent and those of tablet computers 78 
percent  in 2012 compared with the year before, according to IDC, an 
industry-analysis  group. Meanwhile, sales of desktop and portable computers 
sagged, as 
have the  fortunes of companies that make related products, such as 
software. 
Ballmer is a brash, exuberant, natural-born salesman — especially compared  
with the cerebral Microsoft founder Bill Gates, a former Harvard classmate 
who  hired Ballmer in 1980, near the dawn of the PC industry. 
The company portrayed the departure as voluntary, but it comes amid rising  
complaints among investors and a month after a disappointing earnings 
report  sent the company’s share price down by 11 percent. 
Among the problems was a $900 million write-off related to poor sales of 
the  Surface tablet computer, praised by reviewers but largely ignored by 
consumers.  Microsoft has struggled as well with the rollout of the Windows 
Phone and its  latest PC operating system, Windows 8. 
“There is never a perfect time for this type of transition, but now is the  
right time,” Ballmer said in a company statement. “We have embarked on a 
new  strategy with a new organization and we have an amazing Senior 
Leadership Team.  My original thoughts on timing would have had my retirement 
happen 
in the middle  of our company’s transformation to a devices and services 
company. We need a CEO  who will be here longer term for this new direction.” 
The product misfires, analysts say, fell into a familiar pattern, with  
Microsoft moving into markets after other companies already had established  
loyalty among customers. Its Zune music player lost out to Apple’s iPod. The  
Windows line of phones has made little dent in a market dominated by the 
iPhone  and several Android devices. Microsoft’s Bing search engine lags far 
behind  Google.
 
Perhaps the most telling failure has been in  tablet computers. Microsoft 
developed its own tablet, called the Courier, only  to kill it in 2010, ahead 
of the launch date. That same year, Apple released its  first iPad, which 
became one of the most successful consumer products in  electronics history. 
By the time Microsoft released its Surface tablet last year, Amazon, Google 
 and other companies had established popular alternatives to the iPad. 
(Amazon  founder and chief executive Jeffrey P. Bezos has agreed to purchase 
The 
 Washington Post in a deal expected to close this year.)
 
“What Ballmer’s departure tells us is that perception is important in this 
 market — especially Microsoft’s not being perceived as an innovator, not 
being  perceived as sexy,” said David Cearley, a Gartner analyst. 
Refining the innovations of others was an effective strategy for Microsoft 
in  earlier eras. Under Gates, Microsoft created the Windows operating 
system by  mimicking the graphical interface first popularized by Apple’s 
Macintosh  computers. Microsoft’s Web browser, Internet Explorer, was inspired 
by 
earlier  competitor Netscape Navigator. 
Those successes were so total that Microsoft’s market dominance — and its  
ruthless tactics against competitors — eventually provoked a historic 
showdown  with the Justice Department’s antitrust division. That led to a 
federal 
judge  ruling in 2000 that the company was “an abusive monopoly.” 
Ballmer, although long in Microsoft’s top ranks, brought a different 
approach  when he took over the company from Gates that year, leading efforts 
to 
repair  relations with the U.S. government and other technology companies. By 
some  accounts, Microsoft became less ruthless but also less opportunistic 
in spotting  and exploiting markets. 
His era — which is to end officially when Microsoft finds a replacement,  
expected in the next 12 months — has had several notable successes, not the  
least of which has been the continued profitability of the company’s core  
Windows and Office software products. The company has developed a massive  
stockpile of cash, giving it leverage to move into any business it targets. 
Ballmer also oversaw the development of Microsoft’s Azure, a major player 
in  the growing cloud-computing industry, and the development of the popular 
Xbox  gaming system. Xbox developed with relatively little oversight from 
Microsoft’s  top executives, allowing its designers to challenge Sony’s 
popular PlayStation 2  and to embrace the idea of making a gaming console a 
wider 
entertainment device,  as Xbox did through its partnership with Netflix. 
Under Ballmer, Microsoft also acquired Skype, giving the company a foothold 
 in the fast-
changing telecommunications industry. 
Microsoft’s successes have been notable for avoiding direct challenges to 
the  main sources of the company’s profits, the Windows operating system and 
Office  software suite. Product ideas that threatened to disrupt those 
businesses were  quashed over the years by executives determined to protect 
their 
lucrative  turf. 
One idea developed in 2000, about the time Ballmer took over the company,  
would have offered users Web-based programs for handling documents — a part 
of  the market long cornered by Microsoft Office. As the launch date 
approached,  senior executives quietly killed it, said James Grimmelmann, a 
former 
Microsoft  developer who worked on the project. He is now a law professor at 
the University  of Maryland. 
“Every piece of the turf was owned by some powerful business group that 
made  it really hard to launch something profoundly innovative,” said 
Grimmelmann, who  left Microsoft in 2001. 
A similar product was launched in 2005 — by Google. 
Grimmelmann said the ongoing tension within Microsoft is exemplified by the 
 company’s latest computer operating system, Windows 8. It offers users 
both a  traditional interface and a newer one that is inspired by the 
touch-screen  technology that has powered the growth of smartphones and other 
mobile 
devices.  Many consumers, however, have balked at Windows 8, finding the 
operating system  confusing. A simplified update is due soon. 
“By not removing the old interface,” Grimmelmann said, “they guaranteed 
the  failure of the new one.”

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to