A View from the Radical Center of  Politics

 
 
Psychology Today
 
 
A prescription for the future of America 
Published on October 23, 2012 by  _Gregg Henriques_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/gregg-henriques)  in _Theory of 
Knowledge_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/theory-knowledge)  

 
 
 (http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/mating)  
Many of my family, friends, and clients have shared with me that the  
political polarization of our country is spilling over into their lives,  
spurring fights, frustrations, and finger pointing. I personally have been  
spared 
probably because I insist only on political dialogue (i.e., explaining  
where I am coming from and listening openly to others) rather than debate  
(attempting to convince others you are right and denigrating them when they  
don’
t agree). I do this because when I used to engage in competitive debates, I  
found the consequence was almost universally destructive rather than  
constructive. Given that we are in prime election season, the impact of  
polarization is in full force, and a number of recent books have been written  
about 
the psychology of _politics_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/politics)  and the increasing 
polarization of our  nation. (See for example, _The 
Righteous Mind: Why Good People  are Divided by Politics and Religion_ 
(http://righteousmind.com/) , _Splitting America: How Politicians,  Super PACs, 
and the News Media Mirror High Conflict Divorce_ 
(http://www.unhookedbooks.com/SPLITTING-AMERICA-p/book419.htm) , and _The 
Political Brain_ 
(http://www.thepoliticalbrain.com/videos.php) ).

 
I just finished  a book that I think offers a respectable analysis for 
those who are looking for  common ground and a move away from the current 
extremely partisan political _environment_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/environmental-psychology)  and toward 
more centrist pragmatic  solutions. 
The book, _That Used to be Us: How America Fell Behind in the  World It 
Invented and How We Can Come Back_ 
(http://www.thomaslfriedman.com/bookshelf/that-used-to-be-us) , is  written by 
two authors, Thomas Friedman and Michael 
Mandlebaum, who specialize  in foreign affairs and who believe that the 
effective functioning of America is  crucial not only for us, but for the world 
at 
large.
 
The authors make an appeal for the political emergence of the ‘radical  
center’, which calls Americans to seriously reflect on the world we are 
actually  living and to work together toward solutions that will position 
America 
well for  the future. They offer a fairly straightforward blueprint for 
moving forward.  First, in response to their central question, What is the 
world 
in which we  are actually living?, the authors argue that there are four key 
 developments that we must take into consideration as we develop a roadmap 
for  the future.  
The first two challenges are intertwined, and are 1)  globalization and 2) 
the IT revolution. The authors argue that together, these  two developments 
change the economic game for the United States, and they  explain why doing ‘
old’ jobs adequately simply won’t cut it anymore. The reason  is that the 
emergence nations like China, India, Singapore, and Brazil, combined  with 
the networked, hyper-connected, “flat” world created by the IT revolution,  
means that virtually every ‘old’ job has faced or will face a new form of 
_competition_ (http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/sport-and-competition) , 
either by being replaced by  mechanized information processors or by being 
shipped overseas. The upshot of  this situation is that America needs to be 
developing workers for the future,  training as many as possible for highly 
skilled, creative jobs that cannot be  outsourced or mechanized. 
The third major problem is the debt (and deficit). Since the  1980s we have 
seen the emergence and now the full entrenchment of one political  party 
which champions lower taxes and another which champions entitlements,  
resulting in a government which has simultaneously cut taxes (while engaged in  
long, drawn out wars!) and promised rich pensions, health care, and other sweet 
 deals. At $16 trillion and rising at the alarming rate of over a $1 
trillion  dollars a year, there is almost universal agreement among economists 
that if  that trend continues for the foreseeable future, we will eventually 
end up broke  and broken. 
The final major problem is climate change. The authors fully  acknowledge 
that the when, wheres and hows of the impact of climate change are  difficult 
to predict. But it is known that the climate is changing and is  changing 
as a function of manmade greenhouse gas emissions. They argue we must  take 
out an insurance policy against dramatic, damaging climate change; else we  
foolishly risk incurring the wrath of Mother Nature.   
The authors make the strong case that the failure to address  these four 
challenges systematically, with shared purpose and coordinated  action, is a 
recipe for disaster. And the authors argue that the political  polarization, 
exacerbated by the 24 hour media news cycle, has made  the effectiveness of 
American government limited at best, and downright  dysfunctional at worst. 
For example, recently a whole news cycle in  the conservative media was 
dominated by Barack Obama’s use of the phrase  “non-optimal” in describing the 
killings in Lybia on Jon Stewart. This is more  like pro-wrestling than 
serious political analysis. 
So what is the prescription? The authors firmly believe that  shared values 
need to be discussed and embraced. Hard work, merit, _discipline_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/self-control) , and courage, for 
example, are  
prominent themes in the book. Indeed, the authors make the interesting 
point  that one party (Republicans) have a _philosophy_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/philosophy)  and approach good for 
building  meritocracies, 
whereas the other party (Democrats), are good at emphasizing  fairness. Of 
course, ideally America is a fair meritocracy. At another  point the authors 
describe the distinction between situational values and  sustainable values. 
The former involve the here-and-now cost-benefit analysis of  decisions; the 
latter are the deep ideals that guide us across situations  and toward long 
term _goals_ (http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/motivation) . We need 
to emphasize and embrace  sustainable values. 
In keeping with the theme woven throughout the book of looking both  
backward and forward, Friedman and Mandelbaum, argue that what we need to do to 
 
address these challenges is the formula the nation has embraced in the past 
for  it greatness, and it consists of five elements. 
First, we need a topnotch educational system. Much of the book is  spent 
exploring America’s decline in _education_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/education)  and the programs, policies, 
principles,  and perspectives 
that have been offered for turning that decline around. 
Second, we are a nation of immigrants and we desperately need to  reform 
our immigration system and return to being the country that attracts the  best 
and brightest minds from other nations. 
Third, infrastructure provides the backbone upon which the energy of  the 
country flows, and we desperately need to upgrade our bridges, highways, and  
mass transit systems. 
Fourth, we must remain the world leader in research and design.  
Accelerating _innovation_ (http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/creativity)  
will 
define the future, and science and  technology will drive that. We need 
researchers and entrepreneurs in America  leading the way. 
Fifth, we need responsible business regulation that does not  bury seedling 
businesses in a mountain of unnecessary paperwork, but also is not  
freewheeling enough so that huge systems can take unregulated risks only to be  
guaranteed to be bailed out by the government. 
The view from the radical center is that we live in an  increasingly 
complicated world, and it is a world in which America is  potentially on the 
decline. Partisan politics, massive entitlements, and  head-in-the sand science 
deniers result in lame _leadership_ 
(http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/leadership)  and dysfunctional 
government, and if it  continues it will 
inevitably drive us further into trouble. What we need are  individuals who 
tell 
the American people the nature of the world we are living  in. People need to 
hear that after decades of indulgence, we Americans now need  to buckle 
down and sacrifice. We need drain off fewer entitlements and pay more  taxes. 
And we need a strategy for investment that has a real chance of leaving  our 
children better off. If we don’t do this, we will leave them with an  
increasingly capricious and fickle environment, a mountain of debt, and an  
education that pales in comparison with competitors. The choice is ours. The  
question is whether we have the fortitude and maturity to make  it.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to