Real Clear Politics
 
 
 
Obama Administration: Its Incompetence Is  Historic
By _Michael Barone_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/michael_barone/)  - August 27,  2013




 
Evidence of the astonishing incompetence of the Obama administration  
continues to roll in. 
It started with the stimulus package. One-third of the money went to public 
 employee union members -- a political payoff not very stimulating to 
anyone  else. Billions went to green energy loans, like the $500 million that 
the 
 government lost in backing the obviously hapless  Solyndra.




 
Infrastructure projects, which the president continues to tout, never seem 
to  get built. He's been talking about dredging the port of Charleston, for 
example,  to accommodate the big container ships coming in when the Panama 
Canal is  widened. 
The canal widening is proceeding on schedule to be completed in 2014. The  
target date for dredging the port of Charleston: 2024. 
Then there's Obamacare. Barack Obama has already said the administration 
will  not enforce the employer mandate, will not verify eligibility for 
insurance  subsidies and will not require employer-provided policies to cap 
employees'  out-of-pocket costs. 
The Constitution's requirement that the president take care to faithfully  
execute the laws apparently does not apply. 
Obamacare administrators continue to miss deadlines set by the health-care  
law -- 41 of 82 of them, according to Forbes' Avik Roy's reading of  
Congressional Research Service report. 
Then there's the Dodd-Frank financial regulation law. According to the law  
firm Davis Polk, the administration as of July had missed 62 percent of the 
 deadlines in that law. 
All of which indicates incompetence in drafting or in implementing the  
legislation -- likely both. We have a president who delights in delivering  
partisan speeches to adoring audiences but doesn't seem interested in whether  
his administration gets results. 
But I blame someone else, someone who has been dead these last 68 years. I  
blame Franklin D. Roosevelt. I blame Roosevelt for making big government 
look  easy -- and politically rewarding. 
He set an example that most of his successors -- Obama is just the latest 
--  have a hard time duplicating.
Roosevelt certainly had his defects. As his  best and generally admiring 
biographer Conrad Black notes, he was devious,  largely ignorant of economics, 
cruel to subordinates, vacillating on many  issues. 
But he had a great gift for picking the right person for the right job -- 
if  he thought the job was important. For the unimportant jobs -- well, 
anyone  politically useful would do and, if the job suddenly became important, 
the  appointee would be sent off on some diversionary errand. 
Roosevelt's knack for picking the right man (or right woman: Frances 
Perkins  was a fine secretary of labor) is the central theme of Eric Larrabee's 
wonderful  1987 book, "Commander in Chief." 
Larrabee shows how FDR selected the unflappable George Marshall to organize 
a  vastly expanded Army, the splenetic Ernest King to lead an aggressive 
Navy, the  grandioloquent Douglas MacArthur to dramatize the side conflict in 
the South  Pacific and the emollient Dwight Eisenhower to hold together 
fractious Allied  coalition forces. No other president has made such excellent 
military  appointments right off the bat. 
Roosevelt's knack is apparent in domestic appointments, as well. He picked  
social worker Harry Hopkins to run a winter work relief program in late 
1933. In  two weeks Hopkins had 4 million on the payroll. When spring came, 
Roosevelt  ordered the program shut down. In two weeks, the payroll was down to 
zero. 
After that, Roosevelt trusted Hopkins to deal with political bosses -- and  
with top-level negotiations with Winston Churchill and Josef Stalin during 
World  War II. 
Interior Secretary Harold Ickes, Hopkins's bureaucratic rival, was a 
stickler  for detail and scourge of graft. But he spent billions bringing in 
big 
projects  under budget and on time. 
Roosevelt picked some good regulators, too -- stock speculator Joseph 
Kennedy  to set up the Securities and Exchange Commission, Utah banker Marriner 
Eccles to  run the Federal Reserve. 
FDR's knack for choosing the right person for important jobs resulted from  
some unknowable combination of knowledge and intuition. It also showed an  
overriding concern for getting results. 
It's not clear that Barack Obama shares that determination. In his defense, 
 he has made some high-quality appointments, and Roosevelt's administrators 
did  not face today's tangle of legalistic requirements and environmental  
restrictions. 
But New Deal legislation tended to run dozens of pages rather than 
thousands.  And some unworkable laws were overturned by the Supreme Court. 
Roosevelt's example shines through history. But Obama's continuing stumbles 
 show that it's a hard -- and politically damaging -- example to follow. 
Big  government these days is harder than FDR made it  look. 


-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to