Valuable article but, as usual for a Left-wing publication, no mention of  
race
in the context of education.  How long can this continue?  It is  no secret
at all that, while there are some dramatic exceptions (think Sowell
and McWhorter) and although there is a well-educated and rising
black middle class, African-Americans generally weigh down
all national measures of literacy and high-order skills
 
In short, this is a major problem that needs to be addressed,
not swept under the rug and denied for political reasons.
 
Billy
 
---------------------------
 
 
 
U.S. Adults Fare Poorly in a Study of  Skills  
By _RICHARD  PÉREZ-PEÑA_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/richard_perezpena/index.html)
 
Published: October 8, 2013   
(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/08/us/us-adults-fare-poorly-in-a-study-of-skills.html?emc=eta1&_r=0#commentsContainer)
 


American adults lag well behind their counterparts in most other developed  
countries in the mathematical and technical skills needed for a modern  
workplace, according to _a  study_ (http://skills.oecd.org/skillsoutlook.html)  
released Tuesday. 
 
The study, perhaps the most detailed of its kind,  shows that the 
well-documented pattern of several other countries surging past  the United 
States in 
_students’  test scores_ 
(http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009/pisa2009resultswhatstudentsknowandcandostudentperformanceinreadingmathematicsan
dsciencevolumei.htm)  and young people’s _college  graduation rates_ 
(http://www.oecd.org/edu/eag2013%20(eng)--FINAL%2020%20June%202013.pdf)  
corresponds to a skills gap, extending far beyond school.  In the United 
States, 
young adults in particular fare poorly compared with their  international 
competitors of the same ages — not just in math and technology,  but also in 
literacy.  
More surprisingly, even middle-aged Americans — who,  on paper, are among 
the best-educated people of their generation anywhere in the  world — are 
barely better than middle of the pack in skills.  
_Arne  Duncan_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/arne_duncan/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 , the education secretary, released 
a statement saying that the  findings “show our education system hasn’t 
done enough to help Americans compete  — or position our country to lead — in 
a global economy that demands  increasingly higher skills.”  
The study is the first based on new tests developed by  the _Organization  
for Economic Cooperation and Development_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/o/organization_for_economic_cooperation_and_
development/index.html?inline=nyt-org) , a coalition of mostly developed  
nations, and administered in 2011 and 2012 to thousands of people, ages 16 to 
 65, by 23 countries. Previous international skills studies have generally 
looked  only at literacy, and in fewer countries.  
The organizers assessed skills in literacy and  facility with basic math, 
or numeracy, in all 23 countries. In 19 countries,  there was a third 
assessment, called “problem-solving in technology-rich  environments,” on using 
digital devices to find and evaluate information,  communicate, and perform 
common tasks.  
In all three fields, Japan ranked first and Finland  second in average 
scores, with the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway near the top.  Spain, Italy and 
France were at or near the bottom in literacy and numeracy, and  were not 
included in the technology assessment.  
The United States ranked near the middle in literacy  and near the bottom 
in skill with numbers and technology. In number skills, just  9 percent of 
Americans scored in the top two of five proficiency levels,  compared with a 
23-country average of 12 percent, and 19 percent in Finland,  Japan and 
Sweden.  
“The first question these kinds of studies raise is,  ‘If we’re so dumb, 
why are we so rich?’ ” said _Anthony P. Carnevale_ 
(http://cew.georgetown.edu/75006.html) , director  of the Georgetown University 
Center on Education 
and the Workforce. “Our  economic advantage has been having high skill levels 
at the top, being big,  being more flexible than the other economies, and 
being able to attract other  countries’ most skilled labor. But that 
advantage is slipping.”  
In several ways, the American results were among the  most polarized 
between high achievement and low. Compared with other countries  with similar 
average scores, the United States, in all three assessments,  usually had more 
people in the highest proficiency levels, and more in the  lowest. The 
country also had an unusually wide gap in skills between the  employed and the 
unemployed.  
In the most highly educated population, people with  graduate and 
professional degrees, Americans lagged slightly behind the  international 
averages in 
skills. But the gap was widest at the bottom; among  those who did not 
finish high school, Americans had significantly worse skills  than their 
counterparts abroad.  
“These kinds of differences in skill sets matter a lot  more than they used 
to, at every level of the economy,” Dr. Carnevale said.  “Americans were 
always willing to accept a much higher level of inequality than  other 
developed countries because there was upward mobility, but we’ve lost a  lot of 
ground to other countries on mobility because people don’t have these  skills.”
  
Among 55- to 65-year-olds, the United States fared  better, on the whole, 
than its counterparts. But in the 45-to-54 age group,  American performance 
was average, and among younger people, it was behind.  
American educators often note that the nation’s  polyglot nature can 
inhibit performance, though there is sharp debate over  whether that is a 
short-run or long-run effect.  
The new study shows that foreign-born adults in the  United States have 
much poorer-than-average skills, but even the native-born  scored a bit below 
the international norms. White Americans fared better than  the multicountry 
average in literacy, but were about average in the math and  technology 
tests. 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to