The Economist
 
 
A sporting chance
Professional chess has a chequered history. Fans  hope to revive it
Oct 5th 2013
 
 
IN LONDON in April, a 22-year-old Norwegian turned cartwheels by the 
Thames.  Magnus Carlsen, the world’s top-ranked chess player (and a model for 
G-Star RAW,  a fashion firm) had just earned the right to challenge for the 
World Chess  Championship in India next month. His battle against Viswanathan 
Anand, a  43-year-old Indian and world champion since 2007, is a long-awaited 
spectacle.  Match organisers see a chance to turn a struggling sport into a 
global  brand. 
Time was when the world stopped for professional chess. Millions watched  
Bobby Fischer, an American, beat the Soviet Union’s Boris Spassky in 1972. In 
 the 1990s a pair of matches between Garry Kasparov and Deep Blue, a 
computer,  recaptured some of that suspense. Yet despite booming interest in 
the 
amateur  game, top-level chess has become obscure again, hobbled by squabbles 
and  eccentric leadership.
 
 
Enthusiasts spy a comeback. Last year Andrew Paulson, an American 
businessman  based in London, bought rights to stage the game’s most 
prestigious 
contests,  including November’s duel. For $500,000 the World Chess Federation 
(FIDE)  granted Mr Paulson media and marketing licences for a decade—and the 
chance to  make chess a profitable enterprise. 

The game itself has plenty of fans. Research in five countries by YouGov, a 
 pollster, found that more than two-thirds of adults have played at least 
once.  FIDE says 605m do so regularly. In India, where Mr Anand is a national 
hero,  nearly a third of adults claim to play every week. The internet and 
smartphones  mean novices no longer need a friend to play.
 
Susan Polgar, a Hungarian-American grandmaster, says about 35 countries  
include chess in school curricula. FIDE’s membership includes associations in  
178 countries, up from 90 or so in the 1970s. This has cut the dominance of 
 professional competitors from Russia and former Soviet states. Hou Yifan, 
a  19-year-old from China, won the women’s world championship on September 
20th. Mr  Carlsen ...could become western Europe’s first world champion since 
1937. 
But grassroots enthusiasm has not raised the profile of the professional  
game. Critics gripe about mercurial decision-making within FIDE. The sport’s  
governing body gets by on some $2m a year (FIFA, football’s federation, 
spent  more than $1 billion in 2012) and has had only two presidents in 31 
years. Its  boss since 1995 has been Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, who also ran Kalmykia, 
one of  Russia’s poorest regions, until 2010. That year Mr Ilyumzhinov said 
he was once  contacted by aliens; in 2011 he played chess with Muammar 
Qaddafi. 
FIDE has a fractious relationship with some national clubs. The English and 
 Georgian chess federations accuse it of mishandling the appointment of 
several  officials in 2010 (in July 2012 a court of arbitration ruled in FIDE’s 
favour).  Earlier squabbles have had long-lasting impact. In the 1990s Mr 
Kasparov and  Britain’s Nigel Short created a parallel professional circuit. 
The schism  lingered until 2006. 
A deeper challenge is that watching chess is less fun than playing it. A  
single game can last six hours; its most riveting moment may be a strategic  
nuance known as the Yugoslav variation on the Sicilian. “Good chess leads to 
 draws,” says Maurice Ashley, an American grandmaster. 
Mr Ashley believes that new game and tournament formats could attract a 
wider  audience. Competitors in blitz chess must finish their games in half an 
hour.  Matches lasting minutes make popular footage online. Yet many players 
resist  fast games, arguing that they reward low-quality chess. FIDE’s 
enthusiasm for  shorter championships in the 1990s and 2000s prolonged the 
professional game’s  split. 
Lengthy duels could still flourish if packaged  well. Golf’s slow pace does 
not stop big audiences following four-day  tournaments; in the 
cricket-playing world, witty commentary keeps fans tuned to  games that last 
five days. 
Lately ESPN, a broadcaster, has turned poker,  spelling bees and 
Frisbee-flinging ...tense, dramatic television. 
Mr Paulson, who made a fortune in Russian internet ventures, says chess  
matches can make “heart-gripping, heart-pounding entertainment”. (He is 
standing  for president of the English Chess Federation on October 12th.) He 
plans more  competitions in big cities beyond Russia and eastern Europe, where 
many now take  place. In March he launched ChessCasting, a web application 
that offers  statistics and commentary on big events as well as discussion 
boards for amateur  pundits. He talks of reporting competitors’ sweating, eye 
movement and heart  rate. 
Chess needs deep-pocketed backers to complete this transformation. Mr 
Paulson  thinks firms will want to associate with a game that is “clean, pure 
and 
 meritocratic”. But he has not yet announced any big new sponsors. “One 
mistake  has been assuming it would be easier,” he says. A cartwheeling world 
champion  might help.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to