Re: Mark Tooley article in Washington Post A welcome article but it does miss some important points: (1) Christian-faith-only-or-you-are-going-to-Hell religion was never true to begin with and it is long past time when this form of theology needs to be thoroughly discredited. (2) There needs to be a positive theology of friendship with people of other faiths that share (much of) Christian morality. Clearly this says that Islam is completely out of bounds since its moral principles as found in the Koran are close to the exact opposite of Christian morality. Needless to say, this has nothing to do with ethnicity, one can be and should be affirming toward Arabs, Persians, Pakistanis, etc, as people as long as they do not accept orthodox Muslim "morality." This is all about genuine respect and friendship with Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Taoists, Confucians, Zoroastrians, Mormons, and still others (3) Faith must be clearly understood as affirming toward all legitimate forms of science and all legitimate findings of science. This obviously does not mean affirming bogus or politically motivated findings like those that come from the travesty which is the American Psychiatric Association. (4) Faith needs to promote education, not just for kids, but lifelong. (5) The Church needs to be "whole person" in approach, following Ecclesiastes, "a time for war, a time for peace, a time for love and a time for hate." That is, the whole Bible counts, not just the Sermon on the Mount. When you love, make it whole-hearted, but hate what is evil and do so uncompromisingly, holding nothing back in a war against the worst of sins, and we know what those are. Be committed to winning this war and do whatever it takes to be successful. (6) Believers need to base faith on an utterly ruthless approach to truth. Truth first, not belief above truth. This necessarily must mean a positive view of modern-era scholarship. This does not mean accepting all contemporary conclusions, however, far from it. The problem arises when Biblical literalists take the view "the Bible is inerrant and perfect" OR "it all is a lie and worthless." That kind of outlook is completely unjustified and self-defeating. The Bible is a great book, you can say it is the greatest of all books and a vehicle for the Holy Spirit, but it also includes a lot of mistakes -each of which must be acknowledged for what they are, dealt with, so that we can move on. After all, it also includes a wealth of truths that none of the mistakes nullify. (7) It is time for a new Crusade, a war of ideas to reclaim the culture and enlarge Christian culture everywhere, but the kind of Christian culture that affirms the best in Buddhism, that can be accepting of the best in Hindu tradition, and so forth, without compromising away anything that is vital to faith. Billy ================================ W. Post _On Faith_ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-faith) Christianity is not going away * By Mark Tooley the * October 21, 2013
A_ recent Barna study confirms other data_ (http://cities.barna.org/faith-in-new-york-since-9-11/) showing increased church attendance over the last decade in ostensibly secular New York City, including increased numbers of “born-again” believers. The findings defy not only stereotypes about “ godless” New Yorkers but also illustrate that, despite all the talk about secularizing America, church participation has remained remarkably unchanged nationally for most of 80 years. The much ballyhooed religiously unaffiliated number about 15-20 percent of Americans (some of whom still report attending religious services and most of whom still profess belief in God.). About 75-80 of Americans percent say they are Christian, with Jews the next largest religious group, numbering under 2 percent. Yet “Christendom” is reputedly over according to many Christian conservatives, who’ve declared America post-Christian. Some have heralded this reputedly new secular age as an opportunity for the church to recover its prophetic witness. Meanwhile, religious liberals often condemn Christian conservatives for supposedly clinging to Christendom by defending traditional morals in society or civil religion. Some on the Religious left deride the whole project of “Christendom” as an egregious compromise of true Christianity dating back to Constantine. For them, Christendom means centuries of theocracy, conquest, empire, slavery and hypocrisy. Christendom indeed has included nearly all the faults alleged, but it did not invent any of them. Theocracy, conquest, empire, slavery and hypocrisy have been intrinsic to nearly all human history. What the critics forget is that Christendom also refined the social conscience and capacity for reform to challenge its own moral failures. Christendom developed human rights and legal equality, social tolerance, constitutional democracy, free enterprise, technology, modern science and medicine, new levels of arts and literature, and refined notions of charity. Typically most critics of Christendom are unknowingly relying on its assumptions and moral heritage. Some imply that Christians can never really be more than an alternative community, even as they rely on the institutional vestiges of Christendom for their influence and advocacy. More conventional believers on the left denounce the supposed imposition of religious beliefs about marriage or abortion on society while simultaneously urging that society adopt their own religious beliefs about the environment, poverty, or peacemaking. At the same time, Christian conservatives think that political setbacks on marriage, and hostility from cultural elites in the media and academia especially, mean Christendom is gone, perhaps forever. They are building the barricades and preparing for the coming storm. Their concerns are legitimate. But they may underestimate the continuing underlying continued pull of Christendom in American culture. It’s true that America often feels religiously different from past decades, even though rates of religious practice remain mostly unchanged and in some cases even higher than in supposedly more pious eras. Unlike 50 or 100 years ago, the commanding heights of American culture are no longer dominated by Christian belief. Not very long ago, universities were still seriously church affiliated, newspaper editors and publishers were often churchmen in their local communities, publishing was dominated by church-affiliated publishing houses, and even Hollywood was led, if not by pious film makers, then at least by persons, especially immigrants, with deep appreciation for America’s religious heritage. These culture shaping institutions are now vastly changed, mostly owing to the implosion of Mainline Protestantism, which was America’s chief religious and cultural force across 4 centuries. Evangelicalism and Catholicism have demographically displaced Mainline Protestantism. But they do not have sufficient historical momentum in America to fill the cultural void left by the Mainline’s loss of confidence and beneficent surrender of its influence. So America often feels more secular even if Americans are not. But all of us, however unknowingly, still swim in the cultural and moral waters warmed by Christendom. Even arch-secularists, in their constant demands for ever greater rights and self autonomy, speak in the language Christendom created. Today’s reputedly secular Western society in some ways is a victory for Christendom. Across the nations once described as Christendom, there is unprecedented social peace, political stability, legal equality, amelioration of poverty, and historic domestic tranquility. Many champions of Christendom across history, such as the Christian Democrats who struggled to rebuild post-WWII Europe, would be amazed by their success. No less significantly, Christendom is now no longer the West but much if not most of the world. It is felt not just where churches are growing dramatically, in Africa and Asia, but everywhere that lawful government, free markets, legal equality, human rights and wide prosperity have reached. Religious liberals need to reconsider their hostility to Christendom, remembering that the original Social Gospel, with its thirst for justice, was unabashedly Christendom-centered. And religious conservatives, without reducing their passion for needed moral reforms, should be mindful of their blessings and position of unrealized strength. The quiet religious revival in New York City is mostly below the radar screen. But it showcases how Christendom, although it ebbs and flows, after 1700 or so years, is not going away. -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
