Commentary
 
 
The Tea Party Mindset
 
_Peter Wehner_ (http://www.commentarymagazine.com/author/peter-wehner/)  | 
_@Peter_Wehner_ (http://twitter.com/Peter_Wehner)  10.20.2013 


 
 
It’s an interesting place in which I find myself. I share the Tea Party’s  
concerns about the Affordable Care Act and, more broadly, the threats posed 
by  the increasing size, scope and reach of the federal government. I 
recognize the  important role the populist movement played in the 2010 mid-term 
elections. And  _I wrote the other day_ 
(http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/17/tea-party-v-establishment-whats-next-republicans/)
  that it’s 
important  for there to be bridges built between the so-called conservative 
establishment  and the Tea Party. Even still, I’ve found myself increasingly 
out 
of step with  the Tea Party, for reasons that William Galston crystallized 
in his recent _Wall Street Journal column_ 
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303376904579135231053555194.html)
 . 
Professor Galston, in writing about the Tea Party, relied on focus groups  
conducted by Stan Greenberg. As Galston reports 
Supporters of the tea party, [Greenberg] finds,  see President Obama as 
anti-Christian, and the president’s expansive use of  executive authority 
evokes charges of “tyranny.” … ObamaCare is the tipping  point, the tea party 
believes. Unless the law is defunded, the land of limited  government, 
individual liberty and personal responsibility will be gone forever,  and the 
new 
America, dominated by dependent minorities who assert their “rights”  
without accepting their responsibilities, will have no place for people like  
them. 
For the tea party, ObamaCare is much more than a  policy dispute; it is an 
existential struggle. 
This analysis of the underlying attitudes of the Tea Party strikes me as  
basically right, based on my observations of the Tea Party and my own  
conversations and e-mail exchanges with friends and supporters of the Tea 
Party,  
during which I’ve both pushed back against their arguments and tried to  
understand their point of view. 
My sense is they believe that America is at an inflection point. That we 
are  about to enter into the land of no return. That demographic trends are 
all  troubling and that the “takers” in America will soon outnumber the “
givers.”  That for many decades (or more) we’ve seen a _“one-way ratchet toward 
ever bigger  government.”_ 
(http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/rescuing-compromise)  And 
that a majority of Americans will become 
hooked on the  Affordable Care Act like an addict to cocaine. 
Assume this is, more or less, your mindset. If  you love your country and 
believe it is engaged in an existential struggle, and  about to lose – if 
tyranny is just around the corner — it might well create in  you feelings of 
anxiousness, desperation, and aggression. And that can lead  people to engage 
in battles you might not win because failure to fight will  consign America 
to ruin. It is now or never. 
You therefore end up supporting someone like Senator Ted Cruz, who promises 
 to be conservatism’s 21st century Horatius at the  Bridge – in this case 
leading a quixotic effort to force Senate Democrats, and  President Obama 
himself, to defund his signature domestic achievement. And even  if this 
gambit fails and damages your party and helps the very forces you  oppose, so 
be 
it. There is glory in having waged the fight, even (and maybe  especially) a 
losing fight. 
In addition, this outlook creates rising anger at those whom Tea Partiers 
and  their supporters thought were allies but in fact don’t really see the 
true  nature of this apocalyptic struggle. They are part of the “establishment”
 – seen  as passive, compliant, afraid, members of the “surrender caucus.” 
Going along to  get along. Lusting for the approval of the (liberal) 
Georgetown cocktail set.  Angling to appear on Morning Joe. Even, in a way, 
traitors to the cause.  Which means there’s a need for a mass cleansing, the 
purification of a movement  that can only come about by an auto-da-fe – 
directed 
even against those  who agree with you on almost every policy matter. And so 
rock-ribbed  conservatives like Senator Tom Coburn and Representative Pete 
Sessions are  considered RINOs. 
This is not, from my vantage point, a particularly healthy approach to  
politics or one moored to reality. You can believe, as I do, that President  
Obama is doing great harm to America, that his agenda is having an enervating  
effect and that we face deep and serious challenges. 
But some perspective is also in order. We are actually not on the verge of  
collapse and ruin. This period is not comparable to the Great Depression or 
the  period leading up to the Civil War or the collapse of Ancient Rome. 
And tyranny  is not just around the corner. 
This is, rather, a difficult time in some important respects – one that  
requires sobriety and wisdom, public officials of courage and good judgment 
who  are willing to act boldly but not recklessly. The truth is that our 
afflictions  are not beyond our ability to address them, that our society is a 
complicated  mosaic that eludes simple, sweeping characterizations, and America
’s capacity  for self-renewal is quite extraordinary. 
Beyond that is the importance of understanding that the life of a nation,  
like the life of an individual, includes ebbs and flows; that almost every  
generation feels as though the problems it faces are among the worst any  
generation has ever faced; and that setbacks are inevitable and that progress 
is  often incremental. 
A final thought: There is no question that a great deal of repair work 
needs  to be done. But the growing sense among some on the right that a curtain 
of  darkness is descending on America is both unwarranted and can lead 
people to act  in ways that are self-destructive. 
Without understating our challenges for a moment, I rather hope a figure 
will  emerge from within the conservative ranks who is not only principled but 
also  winsome, who possesses an open and flexible mind and has not learned 
the art of  being discontent. A person who doesn’t find fulfillment in 
amplifying anxiety  and anger. Who doesn’t dwell in the lowlands because he’s 
too busy aiming for  the uplands. And who knows that this fallen world is not 
a world without  hope.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to