The Economist
 
 
Europe’s Tea Parties
Insurgent parties are likely to do better in 2014 than at any  time since 
the second world war
Jan 4th 2014 
 
SINCE 2010 or so, the Tea Party, a Republican insurgency, has turned 
American  politics upside down. It comes in many blends, but most of its 
members 
share  three convictions: that the ruling elite has lost touch with the 
founding ideals  of America, that the federal government is a bloated, 
self-serving Leviathan,  and that illegal immigration is a threat to social 
order. The 
Tea Party movement  is central to the conflict that has riven American 
politics and the difficulty  of reforming budgets and immigration laws. 
Now something similar is happening in Europe (see  _article_ 
(http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21592666-parties-nationalist-right-are-changing-ter
ms-european-political-debate-does) ).  Insurgent parties are on the rise. 
For mainstream parties and voters worried by  their success, America’s 
experience of dealing with the Tea Party holds useful  lessons.
 
The squeezed, and angry, middle 
There are big differences between the Tea Party and the European 
insurgents.  Whereas the Tea Party’s factions operate within one of America’s 
mainstream  parties, and have roots in a venerable tradition of 
small-government  
conservatism, their counterparts in Europe are small, rebellious outfits, 
some  from the far right. The Europeans are even more diverse than the 
Americans.  Norway’s Progress Party is a world away from Hungary’s thuggish 
Jobbik. 
Nigel  Farage and the saloon-bar bores of the United Kingdom Independence 
Party (UKIP)  look askance at Marine Le Pen and her Front National (FN) 
across the Channel.  But there are common threads linking the European 
insurgents 
and the Tea Party.  They are angry people, harking back to simpler times. 
They worry about  immigration. They spring from the squeezed middle—people 
who feel that the elite  at the top and the scroungers at the bottom are 
prospering at the expense of  ordinary working people. And they believe the 
centre of power—Washington or  Brussels—is bulging with bureaucrats hatching 
schemes to run people’s lives. 
Mainstream politicians in Europe have tried to  marginalise the insurgents, 
by portraying them as unhinged, racist or fascist.  But it is not working, 
partly because many of the insurgents are making a  determined effort to 
become respectable. UKIP, the FN and the Freedom Party  (PVV) in the 
Netherlands could each win the most votes in European Parliament  elections in 
May. In 
France, 55% of students say they would consider voting for  the FN. The 
Progress Party has joined Norway’s government. Slovakia has a new  far-right 
provincial governor. Count insurgents on the left, such as Syriza in  Greece 
and the Five Star movement in Italy, and mainstream parties in Europe are  
weaker than at any time since the second world war.
 
 
The insurgency is doing well partly because the mainstream has done so 
badly.  Governments encouraged consumers to borrow, let the banks run wild and 
designed  the euro as the pinnacle of the European project. In the past five 
years  ordinary people have paid a price for these follies, in higher taxes, 
 unemployment, benefit cuts and pay freezes. 
This newspaper is sympathetic to the Tea Parties’ insight that the modern  
state often seems designed to look after itself, rather than the citizens it 
is  supposed to serve. It is true that the EU has no answer to the problem 
that  minorities of voters in many countries feel it lacks legitimacy—a 
looming threat  to the euro. But Europe’s insurgents go further than that. 
When Geert Wilders, leader of the PVV, calls the Koran “a fascist book” 
and  Islam “a totalitarian religion”, he is endorsing intolerance. [ 
factually  correct view of the Koran ]When Ms Le Pen demands protection for 
French 
firms  from foreign competition, she is threatening to impoverish her 
compatriots. When  UKIP promises British people prosperity outside the European 
Union, but within a  free-trade zone of its own devising, it is peddling an 
illusion. Increasing  inequality and growing immigration are the corollary of 
technological progress  and economic freedoms that most people would not 
willingly give up. 
Such details do not detain Ms Le Pen who, with the swagger of a politician 
on  the rise, predicts that she will be in the Elysée within a decade. That 
is  highly unlikely, partly because national elections are less susceptible 
to  protest votes than European elections are, and partly because as they 
get closer  to power almost all Europe’s Tea Parties are likely to reveal 
themselves as  incompetent and factional. Yet the insurgents do not need 
victory 
to set the  agenda or to put up barriers to reforms. That is why Europeans 
need to see them  off. 
Honesty in all things 
Attacking the insurgents as fascists worked when Hitler’s memory was fresh, 
 but many of today’s voters rightly see it as mostly a scare tactic. Even 
as the  mainstream demonises the insurgents, it also panders to them by 
adopting pale  versions of their policies—against immigration, global finance 
and 
the EU. But  the mainstream is inhibited by a sense of what is possible and 
an understanding  of what is legal. So it ends up flattering the idea that 
something needs fixing,  while seeming to lack the courage to do anything. 
The lesson from America is that if Europe’s politicians do not want the  
insurgents to set the agenda, they need to counter their arguments. As long as 
 Republican leaders have indulged Tea Party demands to put purity above the 
work  of governing (for instance, by shutting down the federal government) 
they have  sunk lower in the public esteem. The hardline positions of 
Republican candidates  satisfy the party faithful but drive away undecided 
voters, 
costing the party  Senate seats in recent elections and arguably the 
presidency in 2012.  Politicians need to explain hard choices and dispel 
misconceptions. Europe’s  single market is the source of prosperity: enlarge 
it. 
Workers from eastern  Europe pay more into government coffers than they take 
out: welcome them.  Politicians prepared to speak out will find that most 
citizens can cope with the  truth. 
Ultimately, though, the choice falls to voters themselves. The Tea Party  
thrived in America partly because a small minority of voters dominate primary 
 races especially for gerrymandered seats. In elections to the European  
Parliament many voters simply do not bother to take part. That is a gift to 
the  insurgents. If Europeans do not want them to triumph, they need to get 
out to  the polls.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to