Of course, Romney and his staff of high-priced political experts  (ROTFUL)
couldn't see it coming either, nor see much of anything coming and,  so,
ran one of the most inept campaigns in modern presidential election  
history.

 
BR
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 
Millennials Unhappy With Obama's War on  the Young


By _Michael Barone_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/michael_barone/)  - January 21,  2014
_www.realclearpolitics.com_ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com) 
 

 
 
What do young Americans want? Something different from what they've been  
getting from the president they voted for by such large margins. 
Evidence comes in from various polls. Voters under 30, the millennial  
generation, produced numbers for Barack Obama 13 percentage points above the  
national average in 2008 and 9 points above in 2012.




 
But in recent polls, Obama approval among those under 30 has been higher 
than  the national average by only 1 percentage point (Quinnipiac), 2 points  
(ABC/Washington Post) and 3 points (YouGov/Economist). 
Those differences are statistically significant. And that's politically  
significant, since a higher percentage of millennials than of the general  
population are Hispanic or black. 
The reasons for Millennials' decreased approval of Obama become clear from 
a  Harvard Institute of Politics poll of 18- to 29-year-olds conducted in  
November. 
That poll shows Obama's job approval dipping to 41 percent, down from 52  
percent in April 2013 and the lowest rating in any HIOP survey. 
One reason for the decline is Obamacare. Only 38 percent approved of  
Obamacare (39 percent approved of "the Affordable Care Act"). Only 29 percent 
of  
those who were uninsured said they would definitely or probably enroll in 
the  health insurance exchanges. 
Those results were registered five to nine weeks after the Oct. 1  
healthcare.gov rollout. Tech-savvy millennials must have been astonished that  
government produced a website that didn't work. 
They also perceived, accurately, that Obamacare health insurance would cost 
 them a lot. The law passed by Democrats elected in large part with 
millennial  votes was designed to have people under 30 subsidize the insurance 
premiums of  those older, less healthy people over 50. 
The old tend to have significant net worth, and the young -- with credit 
card  and student loan debt -- tend to owe more than they own. Evidently, the 
Obama  Democrats think it's progressive for the young to subsidize the 
working-age  old. 
That, after all, is the essence of Social Security, whose benefits some  
left-wing Democrats want to increase. 
But millennials, whose penchant for volunteering is admirably high, are not 
 being simply selfish. The Harvard survey also finds that they tend to 
believe,  by a 44- to 17-percent margin, that the quality of their health care 
will get  worse under Obamacare. 
That's speculation, of course. But it suggests a healthy skepticism about 
the  ability of a government, a government that lied about whether you could 
keep  your insurance and your doctor, and couldn't construct a workable 
website, to  produce a system that will improve service delivery. 
That skepticism may owe something to young Americans' experience with 
student  loans. Some 57 percent of the Harvard study millennials say that 
student 
loan  debt is a major problem for young people. The responses don't vary 
much by  political party identification. 
Once again, the millennials have a point. The Obama administration did not  
initiate government student loans, but it continues to speak of them  
approvingly. 
Yet it's obvious that the vast sums government-subsidized student loans 
have  pumped into higher education over the last three decades have been 
largely  captured by colleges and universities and transformed into 
administrative 
 bloat. 
Economics blogger Timothy Taylor notes that if you count prices in 1982-84 
as  100, the average cost of all items in the consumer price index increased 
to 231  in September 2012. Energy, housing and transportation all increased 
about that  much. 
But college and tuition fees increased to 706 -- seven times the level when 
 the government started pumping money into higher ed. Medical care inc
reased to  more than 400. 
Some things that young people buy increased much less -- apparel (127), 
toys  (53) and televisions (5, thanks to quality improvement). 
But suddenly, in their early adult years, millennials find themselves 
socked  with the inflated costs of higher education and, thanks to Obamacare, 
those of  older people's health care. 
In the meantime, in the Obama new normal economy, they aren't finding jobs 
--  and may be giving up on looking for them. 
Labor force participation among those 55 and over has held steady since 
2009.  But labor force participation among those younger has been declining, as 
have  earnings of college graduates. 
The combination of higher education and health care costs and the new 
normal  economy amount to what analyst Walter Russell Mead calls "the war on 
the  
young." 
No wonder they're unhappy with the president who promised hope and change.  
Maybe they're in the market for an  alternative. 


-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to