SLC Tribune
 
 
 
 
Why is  Utah’s hired gun fighting gay marriage? His Mormonism 
Published on Jan 24, 2014

 
In an email purportedly sent to his colleagues, _Gene Schaerr_ 
(http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57407081-78/court-schaerr-utah-law.html.csp) 
 made it 
clear why he was leaving his lucrative  post as a partner at a prestigious 
Washington, D.C., law firm to defend Utah’s  laws barring same-sex marriage: 
his Mormon faith. 
The leaked email was first posted by _Elie Mystal on the Above The Law 
blog_ (http://abovethelaw.com/2014/01/departure-gospel-of-the-day/) . In it, 
Schaerr said he  was taking a temporary position with the Utah attorney general’
s office. 
"I have accepted that position so that I can fulfill what  I have come to 
see as a religious and family duty: defending the  constitutionality of 
traditional marriage in the state where my church is  headquartered and where 
most of my family resides," Schaerr said in the Jan. 17  email to co-workers at 
Winston & Strawn. 
Then, quoting from the Bible, Schaerr said he left with  confidence that 
"all things work together for good to them that love God" and  invoked a 
blessing on the firm and his colleagues. 
Mystal’s reaction was "whatever." 
"Some people’s God calls them to help the poor or feed  the hungry or sue 
for peace," he wrote. "Other people’s God gets bent out of  shape when loving 
gay or lesbian couples call themselves ‘married.’ ... People  are 
(allegedly) called, by their faiths, to do all sorts of things." 
But Mystal did question the appropriateness of the  email. 
"You can’t send out firm-wide emails wishing Jews  a ‘Merry Christmas’ and 
hoping that they accept Jesus Christ as the one true  savior over the 
holidays," he wrote. " ... It’s only with gay people where  Bible-based 
inequality is still professionally respected as a difference of  opinion. But 
maybe 
that’s changing?" 
_The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) took umbrage with Schaerr_ 
(http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/blogscrimecourts/57434065-71/HRC)  for  citing 
his personal 
religious beliefs as the primary reason for taking on the  case. 
"It’s alarming that the reason _Gene Schaerr_ 
(http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57407081-78/court-schaerr-utah-law.html.csp) 
 gives for taking this 
position has nothing to do  with the U.S. Constitution or the legal issues at 
play," Fred Sainz, HRC’s vice  president of communications, said in a 
statement. "Schaerr’s entire motivation  for taking this anti-equality case is 
to 
impose a certain religious viewpoint on  all Utahns — and that’s wrong. 
When you become an attorney, you take an oath to  uphold the U.S. Constitution, 
not any particular religious doctrine." 
Utah, Sainz noted, did not raise any  religious-freedom arguments before 
U.S. District Court Judge Robert J. Shelby,  who ruled Dec. 20 that Amendment 3
’s ban on same-sex marriage was  unconstitutional. 
"It’s fair to question," Sainz said, "whether all  of the arguments they 
have made are just an elaborate front for some other  agenda."  
Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes issued a  statement Wednesday night that 
said religious views were never a factor in  hiring Schaerr. 
"Mr. Schaerr was hired because he was the most  qualified applicant and 
gives us the best chance to win," Reyes said. "Any  intimation that he was 
hired for reasons other than his qualifications, his  understanding of the 
Constitution and his mastery of the legal issues in this  case are offensive 
and 
detract from the civility this case merits." 
Reyes announced Jan. 16 that Schaerr, a Utah native and  graduate of 
Brigham Young University, would lead the legal team defending  Amendment 3’s 
ban 
on same-sex marriage. A federal judge ruled Dec. 20 the law  was 
unconstitutional. 
The state is paying Schaerr $200,000 to guide an appeal  through the 10th 
U.S. Circuit Court.  
Paul Mero, president of the conservative Sutherland  Institute, said HRC’s 
reaction "shows how insensitive HRC is to anything having  to do with faith 
and family." 
"Their worldly paradigm is so foreign to what we are  trying to do in 
defending Utah’s marriage law," Mero said. "That someone would  resign a good 
job 
to take on a great cause isn’t shocking to me, but I guess  it’s shocking 
to HRC. I just don’t see the separation of church and state as  meaning an 
individual has to give up every ounce of faith and freedom they  believe in 
to somehow entertain a secular idea that the law is such and  such." 
Mero disclosed last week that Schaerr also has been hired  as an institute 
fellow who will write policy papers for the Salt Lake City-based  think 
tank. Mero wouldn’t disclose what role the institute played in Schaerr’s  
selection but said he was the "right guy" for the job, one who has "traditional 
 
marriage and the natural family" as part of his DNA. 
Steve Owens, a former Utah State Bar president and Ethics  Advisory 
Committee member, said Schaerr was free to "resign for whatever reason  he 
wants or 
no reason." 
His email "sheds light on his personal motives," said  Owens, who is in 
private practice with the firm Epperson & Owens.  
"Still, as I see it, it is not unethical for a lawyer to  have a personal 
religious motivation to represent his or her client’s position,"  Owens said. 
"However, it may make it harder for the attorney to be  objective." 
Attorney Paul C. Burke, who represented the Utah Pride  Center when it 
filed an amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in the Defense of  Marriage Act 
and Proposition 8 cases, said it was laudable when an attorney is  willing 
to make professional sacrifices because of conscience, personal  conviction, 
or sincerely held religious beliefs.  
But Burke lamented Schaerr’s conflation of religious  belief with civil 
law. 
"In our pluralistic country, every American  citizen has the right to hold 
religious beliefs of the person’s own choosing,"  Burke said. "What the U.S. 
Constitution forbids is the conversion of any  religious beliefs held by 
any person or sect into laws that would discriminate  and deprive any group of 
fellow citizens of their fundamental  rights."

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to