CNN Opinion
 
When Hollywood's right wing was cool
 
By Timothy Stanley
updated 12:25 PM EST, Thu February 13,  2014


 
Editor's note: Timothy Stanley is  a historian and columnist for the Daily 
Telegraph. He is the author of the  forthcoming_ "Citizen Hollywood: How the 
Collaboration between LA and DC  Revolutionized American Politics"_ 
(http://us.macmillan.com/citizenhollywood/TimothyStanley)   
(CNN) -- For those who didn't know much about Shirley  Temple,_  her 
passing this week _ 
(http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/11/showbiz/hollywood-shirley-temple-death/) 
revealed two surprises. First, that her post-Hollywood  career 
was dominated by public service. She ran (unsuccessfully) for Congress in  
1967, served as a representative to the United Nations and was ambassador to 
 Ghana and Czechoslovakia. _And second, she was a Republican._ 
(http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/shirley-temple-politics-103371.html)  
She was 
that rarest of  things nowadays: a Hollywood star who admitted to voting for 
the GOP. 
Today, Hollywood appears  uniformly liberal. But once upon a time, things 
were different. While  researching my forthcoming book on Hollywood and 
politics, I was surprised to  discover how many vocal conservatives there were 
in 
Hollywood well into the  1970s - and that many of them enjoyed the company 
of Richard Nixon.
 
 
John Wayne narrated a Nixon  biographical documentary at the 1972 GOP 
convention, where Clint Eastwood was a  highly visible guest. Bob Hope toured 
the 
country with Jack Benny and country  pop star Glenn Campbell to drum up 
support for the troops in Vietnam. Hope  closed his 1970 Christmas TV special 
with a plea for viewers to get behind the  President. James Stewart once told 
reporters, "All you have to do is go to  Vietnam to see that the kids are 
still patriotic," and suggested that antiwar  Hollywood actors were just 
eaten up with bitterness at Nixon's popularity. 
Yet in 21st century America, the  only public Hollywood support Republicans 
can get (_look  at Romney's pitiful donations_ 
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77717.html) ) tends to come from 
faded action heroes like  
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Chuck Norris. Yes, Eastwood is still a fan of the 
GOP,  as is Jon Voight, and Vince Vaughn is close to_ the Paul family._ 
(http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/09/19/vince_vaughn_meets_the_pauls.html)
  
But the acting contingent of conservatism  has shrunk. The reason is recent 
political dynamics. Hollywood has moved to the  left; the Republicans have 
moved to the right. 
When Shirley Temple Black was a  child star, Hollywood was dominated by 
powerful Republican moguls. The movies  she tap danced and sang through for Fox 
might have earned the praise of Franklin  D Roosevelt (he once said, "It is 
a splendid thing that for just 15 cents an  American can go to a movie and 
look at the smiling face of a baby and forget his  troubles"), but the 
industry that produced them was anti-union, anti-communist,  and typically 
anti-Democrat. 
There was, for example, _near unanimity between the otherwise inharmonious 
studio chiefs _ 
(http://www.thenation.com/article/155381/upton-sinclairs-epic-campaign) in 
opposing Upton Sinclair's 1934 ultra-liberal campaign for 
governor of  California. (Sinclair wanted to introduce a graduated income tax.) 
The moguls  actually made their staff donate a week's salary to Sinclair's 
Republican  opponent.
 
 
But the moguls lost their power  when the studios were undone by 
trust-busting and TV. In the 1960s, a new  generation of stars defined 
themselves 
artistically by their revolt against the  studio machine and "square" 
middle-American culture. These were the beautiful  people like Jane Fonda, 
Warren 
Beatty and Shirley MacLaine. They began as  political outsiders, but their 
activism slowly professionalized and grew into  PACs that raised millions of 
dollars for almost exclusively Democrat  campaigns. 
Men like Steven Spielberg,  Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen became the 
new kingmakers. In one month of  the 2012 election season, _Spielberg and 
Katzenberg_ 
(http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steven-spielberg-gives-president-obama-381445)
  each gave $1 million to President  Obama's super PAC 
Priorities USA. Hollywood money is an indispensable part of  the modern 
Democrat machine. 
Of course, movie makers might  consider themselves socially progressive, 
but, as their disposable income  attests, they are still ambitious capitalists 
-- ones that might have remained  more open to the Republican Party if it 
had only stuck to its old theme of  limited, small tax government. But the 
GOP viscerally repelled the new Hollywood  with its social conservatism. 
The actor Ronald Reagan's  election as president ought to have represented 
the pinnacle of Hollywood  conservatism, but, ironically, it actually 
represented the beginning of its  post-Nixon decline. Reagan's willingness to 
reach out to the religious right  meant that while he was certainly a product 
of 
the movie industry, he had  effectively divorced himself from its libertine 
culture. 
Throughout his time in office,  his Hollywood support base whittled down to 
the last surviving members of the  Shirley Temple generation. _When the 
Gipper threw a televised charity function in 1985_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMa19_S0or0) ,  the guests were Frank Sinatra, 
Charlton Heston and Dean 
Martin. The only real  contemporary 80s star was Burt Reynolds. 
In other words, as Hollywood  moved left and the Republicans moved right, 
they passed each other on the  political spectrum. One wonders whether 
Shirley Temple would have felt as  comfortable identifying herself with the GOP 
today as she did in the 1960s and  1970s. My guess is yes. After all, her 
Republicanism persisted (she was still  campaigning for George H.W. Bush in 
1992) and, as a child rather than an adult  star, she had nothing to lose in 
terms of Hollywood clout by going public with  her conservatism. 
For all those moderate  Republicans (and, yes, they really do exist) out 
there in Hollywood, things are  a lot harder. If they come out as 
conservative, they risk never getting invited  to any forthcoming benefits 
_George 
Clooney might be throwing to liberate the Elgin  Marbles_ 
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/film-news/10631031/George-Clooney-and-Bill-Murray-tell-Brit
ain-hand-back-the-Elgin-Marbles.html) . That's a serious problem, because 
Hollywood is a business in which  who you know is as important as what you 
know. Therefore, if stars admit their  Republicanism, they risk losing 
friends, parts and a steady income. No wonder so  few do it.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to