April Fool's Day 2014: Religious Origins Of The World's Silliest Holiday
Peggy Fletcher Stack ("The Huffington Post," March 31, 2014)
Let’s be clear: April Fools’ Day is not a religious holiday.
It does, however, trace its origins to a pope.
The day began, most believe, in 1582, when Pope Gregory XIII decreed the
adoption of the “Gregorian calendar” — named after himself — which moved
New Year’s Day from the end of March to Jan. 1.
The change was published widely, explains Ginger Smoak, an expert in
medieval history at the University of Utah, but those who didn’t get the
message
and continued to celebrate on April 1 “were ridiculed and, because they
were seen as foolish, called April Fools.”
Even though the annual panoply of pranks meant to mock the gullible or to
send a friend on a “fool’s errand” may not be grounded in any ancient
religious merrymaking, the notion of “holy fools” does have a long and
respected place in Judeo-Christian history.
Hebrew prophets were often scorned as mad or eccentric for pronouncing
unwelcome or uncomfortable truths. The Apostle Paul talked to the Corinthians
about becoming “fools for Christ.” And Eastern Orthodoxy still sees the “
holy fool” as a type of Christian martyr.
Such views are wrapped up in paradox.
“If the wisdom of the world is folly to God, and God’s own foolishness is
the only true wisdom,” argues British clergyman John Saward in “Perfect
Fools: Folly for Christ’s Sake in Catholic and Orthodox Spirituality,” “it
follows that the worldly wise, to become truly wise, must become foolish and
renounce their worldly wisdom.”
Such role reversals were common during medieval Christian festivals.
Some argue that April Fools’ Day is a remnant of early “renewal festivals,”
which typically marked the end of winter and the start of spring.
These festivals, according to the Museum of Hoaxes, typically involved “
ritualized forms of mayhem and misrule.”
Participants donned disguises, played tricks on friends as well as
strangers, and inverted the social order.
“Servants might get to order around masters, or children challenge the
authority of parents and teachers,” the museum’s website notes. “However, the
disorder is always bounded within a strict time frame, and tensions are
defused with laughter and comedy. The social order is symbolically challenged,
but then restored, reaffirming the stability of the society, just as the
cold months of winter temporarily challenge biological life, and yet the
cycle of life continues, returning with the spring.”
Some have mistaken these celebrations for medieval Christianity’s Feast of
Fools, which took place each January.
For centuries, this feast was seen as “a disorderly, even transgressive
Christian festival, in which reveling clergy elected a burlesque Lord of
Misrule, who presided over the divine office wearing animal masks or women’s
clothes, sang obscene songs, swung censers that gave off foul-smelling smoke,
played dice at the altar, and otherwise parodied the liturgy of the church,”
says historian Max Harris, author of “Sacred Folly: A New History of the
Feast of Fools.” Afterward, revelers would “take to the streets, howling,
issuing mock indulgences, hurling manure at bystanders, and staging
scurrilous plays.”
But that’s not what happened, he says.
Even Victor Hugo’s famous novel “The Hunchback of Notre-Dame” — and the
Disney animated film loosely based on it — got it wrong. In Hugo’s opening
passages, Harris explains, the novelist describes “rowdy theatricals and
underworld parades of lay Parisians … ‘on the sixth of January 1482’ as a
combined celebration … of the day of the kings and the Feast of Fools.”
Those two celebrations were “nothing of the sort,” Harris wrote in an
email from his home in Wisconsin. “Indeed, they were not even an accurate
portrayal of lay festivities.”
Such revelry, Harris says, “was almost wholly a figment of Hugo’s
imagination.”
So what was it really like?
The actual feast was developed in the late 12th and early 13th centuries as
“an elaborate and orderly liturgy for the day of the Circumcision (Jan. 1),
” Harris says, “serving as a dignified alternative to rowdy secular New
Year festivities.”
The goal, he emphasizes, was “not mockery but thanksgiving for the
incarnation of Christ.”
Role reversals did occur, but their point, Harris said, was to underscore
Mary’s joyous affirmation that God “has put down the mighty from their seat
and exalted the humble.”
The “fools” represented those chosen by God for their lowly status.
This liturgical feast was largely confined to cathedrals and collegiate
churches in northern France.
Centuries later, high-ranking clergy “who relied on rumor rather than
firsthand knowledge, attacked and eventually suppressed the feast,” Harris
saidl. “Eighteenth- and 19th-century historians repeatedly misread records of
the feast; their erroneous accounts formed a shaky foundation for subsequent
understanding of the medieval ritual.”
The Feast of Fools was finally forbidden by the Council of Basle in 1435.
That misunderstanding of history, though, eventually found its way into
Hugo’s novel and even the Catholic Encyclopedia, which linked the “feast of
fools” to the pagan celebration of Saturnalia, whose “parody must always
have trembled on the brink of burlesque, if not of the profane.”
That is unfortunate, said Harris, who has read and studied the original
documents from the time. In his mind, the feast was more sanctified than
sacrilegious.
--
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
